by Sixstrings » Fri 30 Apr 2010, 00:34:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '
')So no matter how you look at it, when our brain dies then everything we think of as "me" dies too -- maybe something else continues, but that would be something different entirely and not "us" at all.
Well if I just wanted to talk about things that are specific to myself, I'd write a blog and not have discussions on a forum. Life after death has to be an objective quanity, unless you're suggesting that everyone will have their own reality -- muslims will go to their heaven, Christians to theirs, Buddhists go up to the Big Mind or reincarnate, etc.
Once you buy into post-modernism, the idea that everyone has their own valid reality and there is no objective truth, then you can't even have a discussion at that point.
When I say "you" it's just a figure of speech, and I wish you wouldn't take it so personally. But I was grammatically correct -- I'm throwing an idea out there as a logical argument, trying to get to the bottom of at least one item of objective truth.
I've never once heard anyone suggest that the afterlife is a carbon copy of our life here on earth -- it's all either spirits or reincarnation or something even more complex like "oneness" with the universal "big mind."
My logical argument is that all of this is fundamentally different than who we are right now today, in our physical bodies, our hormones, and our biologically-based networks of neurons. Therefore, if you're talking about life after death in terms of "you" continuing on, that's impossible since what makes you "you" can't be replicated in a non-biological form (in other words, being a ghost slamming random doors and flipping spoons over in someone's house is not really life after death, it's just transformation into something so different that what used to be "you" is now gone).
Let me try to summarize more simply. What we think of as "us" is unique to our physical bodies -- if it's a spirit or bhuddist big mind or a reincarnated lizard then those are all new things, not "us" at all.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his is just a pet peeve of mine, and
I know I probably go on about it a lot, but here you are again telling everyone the Truth. Again.
Yes you do, this has become a pattern with you and me. You're always taking things I say too personally. I acknowledge that I get on your nerves Ludi, but your extreme oversensitivity has now finally gotten on my nerves enough to come out and say it.
I'm sorry, I can't filter everything I write to take into account what may or may not bother you. If I'm getting on a lot of people's nerves then that's a different matter -- I'm not here to annoy people, that's for sure.
The best thing I can suggest is that you try to be more tolerant, as I have always tried to be tolerant with you. Honestly, it's not that hard. I have never been rude to you, maybe you don't like my style but so what -- move on, read another post.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '&')quot;No matter how you look at it" you, Sixstrings, say to all of us.
Relax, it's jut my opinion. My thoughts in this thread are just my attempt to apply some logical reasoning to the question. Trust me, I don't like my conclusions -- I did say I hope I'm wrong.
But again, it's just my opinion -- tell me what you disagree with, rather than just berate me for daring to suggest there might be objective truth that applies to everyone. If you think everyone lives in their own reality, and there's no objective truth, then talk more about that.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')o, you are saying how EVERYONE should look at these ideas.