Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Skeptics of the World, Unite!

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 11:37:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Mesuge', '
')Learn, study, come back and refute evidence, historical narrative, presented e.g. in books of like Peter Dale Scott, Russ Baker, or William Pepper's. Only then you will be taken seriously as a partner to discussion.


In other words, you cherry pick your "experts" and disregard the rest. Why not add David Icke to the list?

Image
mos6507
 

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby Mesuge » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 12:52:05

Nice kiddy lizzard there, sadly it just yet again illustrates the point of mine, cheap shots of no substance on your part. Since you didn't offer any substance till that point, hence the reference to scholars, experts, and your chance to refute them in logical rational dispute or offering a contra narrative, you declined.

Btw. I didn't know Icke was available on mainstream uni libraries, appeared on NYT top bestseller list, or is being endorsed by mainstream intelectuals..

That doesn't mean these are the most important tags of credibility, but certainly an inteligent person (I used to assume you aspire to) would at least attempt to match it in 1:1 rank. Seems you are able to act only like a kid with toy deffered, hm, without going further deep into psycho-analysis some comparisons to one dying empire over the pond could be drawn.. :roll:
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 13:15:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Mesuge', '
')Nice kiddy lizzard there, sadly it just yet again illustrates the point of mine, cheap shots of no substance on your part. Since you didn't offer any substance till that point, hence the reference to scholars, experts, and your chance to refute them in logical rational dispute or offering a contra narrative, you declined.


It illustrates nothing because this isn't a thread designed to get into the pros and cons of individual CTs. I stay out of the 911 topic because it's a useless timewaster, as are debates about the moon landings, JFK, or evolution. I knew this thread would devolve into tinfoilers baiting skeptics, and the only way to deal with that is to not play the game. And of course the tinfoilers will claim victory by filibustering. It doesn't make it so, however.

What the article I cited pretty much speaks for itself. My opinion is that the ground rules that tinfoilers use in order to divine the truth is fundamentally flawed, and yet tinfoilers don't recognize it, and never will. That is why any debate with tinfoilers is a waste of time because a tinfoiler and a skeptic just aren't using the same criteria to separate truth from fiction. It's not that tinfoilers have nothing they construe as evidence or so-called experts to trot out, but that in all cases, these items do not pass close scrutiny. It's just that the yardstick tinfoilers use is so skewed by ideological bias that they draw whatever conclusion fits their preferred narrative of the evil PTB whether it's justified or not.
mos6507
 

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 13:36:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', ' ') I'm sure NORAD does drills on all kinds of things, all the time;
Surely, when you're doing drills, you have to have a contingency plan in case a real emergency happens while you're drilling.

Especially in a defence situation where an enemy might find out about your drill in advance and take advantage of your lapse in security.

But, "Oh, gee! We never thought of that" was a good enough answer for the 9/11 Commission.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby shortonsense » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 14:24:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '
')But, "Oh, gee! We never thought of that" was a good enough answer for the 9/11 Commission.


Perhaps it was good enough because it was true?
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 19:24:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'I')t's like someone at the equator not beliving in glaciers. You show them pictures of the artic, a movie of people on the glacier, let them talk to the people that have been there and bring them a piece of the glacier back in a 7-11 styrofoam cooler and they still don't believe it.


That's actually a really good analogy -- I think I noticed most of the moon landing hoax proponents on this forum seem to be either from Australia or Europe. The one youtube "expert" who keeps getting mentioned is from Australia.

So ya, I can understand now why someone from Australia would doubt that the Saturn rockets ever launched from the Cape in Florida -- the average Australian probably has never been to the US, doesn't know anyone who has, and certainly has never been to the Kennedy Space Center.

They probably learned about Apollo from two sentences in a school history book, but since it's an American achievement they would have just moved on to other subjects. Similarly, their TV and other media has probably spent very little time ever talking about Apollo. So that could be part of it too, that Australians just aren't as much aware of the history in the US during the space race.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby dorlomin » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 20:23:26

Let me say this with 100% certainty. A human manufactured object launched from the US orbited and produced a lander that landed on the moon during all of the Apollo lander missions. Independent radio telescopes around the world tracked that object including those from highly hostile nations. The physics of faking things like the location of the transmission which could be triangulated with childish ease, monitoring the redshift of the signal as it moved, monitoring the occulation of the object by the moon as it orbited is all well within the capabilities of a number of nations and IIRC was done with all space missions as a matter of routine. The Soyuz 1 disaster was famously tracked by US tracking stations for example.


IIRC (may be wrong) you can actualy examine the Jodrell Bank tapes made of its independent tracking of the flight.

The returned moon rocks are stunning corroborating evidence of at least some robotic pressence on the moon.

For the price of one Lunokhod mission the Soviets could have shattered Americas international standing had they faked the mission.

But then again the Soviets were probibly in on it in some nefferious way, as were the Chinese, British, French, German etc scientists who monitored the mission.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 20:26:44

My husband saw the Apollo 17 night launch from his backyard as a youngster, so he tends to believe they went to the moon.
Ludi
 

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby dorlomin » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 20:36:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'G')oebels was the 1st mega master brainwasher, using the power of the 1st serious public address amplification system. Being able to speak to up to a million people at a time was what brought Hitler to power. Unlike the radio, which was usually heard at home, mass rallies and PA systems had the advantage of group psychology.
No the first modern 'brainwasher' was a chap by the name of Edward Berneys.

And the political and social movement that brought Hitler to power has been studied to death. Hitler was only one part of the equation that included an alliance of industrialists looking for a nationalist pro capitalist candidate that could blunt the appeal of revolutionary marxism, democratic socialism and other popular political movements. And the direct line from the Freikorps to Ernst Rohms SD and their role in the assumption of power by the NSDAP is far more important than the Nurenmberg rallies. I strongly submit that your analysis is far too reductionist and aimed at fitting an agenda than the facts.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 21:17:22

I have read tons of stuff about Hitler. I was over simplifying, but I still think the PA had a huge impact via groupthink. Compare listening to a band on a recording to a live performance and you get the idea. To this day, the vast majority of successful musicians are those capable of live performance.

As I already stated, I don't know what happened in these events. I am not claiming to know; merely stating that there is room for doubt on these 3 events when contrary evidence is studied.

I can't help but note that so far all those arguing opposite me are American; where are the other citizens?

For a country with an education system like the USA's, where most people can't point at either of the 2 countries it has invaded in the last decade, to presume people of other countries doubt you because they weren't educated properly stinks of farce.

I agree with Mesuge, that people prepared to jump in to defend status quo beliefs about American history have clearly not looked at alternative sources of information in any detail, or have begun such study with a fixed view. We all tend to find evidence to support our belief system.

Mos can't help but lump up doubters of the USA like me with creationists, for instance. His attitude and that of his article writer are straight out straw man.
There are far more creationists in the USA than in any other modern country in the world; the majority of whom believe the official line on the 3 instances being talked about here.

(BTW, I was born in the USA and raised by a very patriotic American father who was a MP for 7 years in Berlin. Most of my closest friends at home in the Philippines are American military. I know America has greatness in it's history. This doesn't mean I have to accept the official story about everything the USG does.)
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby Pretorian » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 22:29:51

well, JFK surely got some issues with some people, so believing that a nutcase that was asking for asylam in USSR and tried to killed himself did it all on his own is kinda silly, imho.
9/11? I really dont give a damn, but official story does have more holes than matter. I do remember seeing a front page of their main terrorist's passport in a foreign paper, with claims that FBI found it on the cite of crash. And why would anybody in his own mind ram the plane into a building half an hour before all the fat cats start to crawl into?

Moon thing surely happened, not a big deal, but again i dont give a damn if it didnt.


PS I recall a reaction of one of my friends (white catholic from South America, big patriot of his country) on a big front-page picture of Osam bin Laden.
He said: "Look! This man is a GOD!"
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby shortonsense » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 22:58:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', ' ')Things will only get worse.


Off topic, ad hom. Deleted.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby americandream » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 23:32:36

Capitalists do what comes natural in order to make a profit, and that includes lying and cheating. Wouldn't you were you stinking rich? They are hardly going to conspire a'la 911 unless there was money in it and they were all one big happy family.

They aren't the latter, more an amorphous mass of the profit hungry and consequently I hardly rate 911 a conspiracy event....the handiword of the overlords of the Islamic Empire perhaps, but the handywork of a worldwide conspiracy of fatcats, hardly.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', ' ')Things will only get worse.


Off topic, ad hom. Deleted.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 28 Apr 2010, 23:43:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '
')They probably learned about Apollo from two sentences in a school history book, but since it's an American achievement they would have just moved on to other subjects. Similarly, their TV and other media has probably spent very little time ever talking about Apollo. So that could be part of it too, that Australians just aren't as much aware of the history in the US during the space race.




I don't think that has anything to do with it. It's because (at the time at least) people could not accept the idea that humans had the technical skill to land a man on the moon. To most of us today, such a thing doesn't seem that extraordinary, but back then, such a feat was almost symbolic of supernatural accomplishment. So it broke a lot of people's rigid ideas about our God-imposed limits. This is symbolized by the aliens in 2001 placing a monolith on The Moon, as it represented an important milestone in human progress.

On the flipside, with 911 troothery, people just can not accept that a bunch of a-rabs could slip through our defenses. We're too proud to admit our weaknesses. So we have to invent an inside-job to have engineered it, otherwise we'd feel too vulnerable to another attack. The devil you know is preferable to the devil you don't know, basically. There is no reasoning with Al Qaeda but you can always kick the bumbs out of washington.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 29 Apr 2010, 00:40:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '
')They probably learned about Apollo from two sentences in a school history book, but since it's an American achievement they would have just moved on to other subjects. Similarly, their TV and other media has probably spent very little time ever talking about Apollo. So that could be part of it too, that Australians just aren't as much aware of the history in the US during the space race.




I don't think that has anything to do with it. It's because (at the time at least) people could not accept the idea that humans had the technical skill to land a man on the moon. To most of us today, such a thing doesn't seem that extraordinary, but back then, such a feat was almost symbolic of supernatural accomplishment. So it broke a lot of people's rigid ideas about our God-imposed limits. This is symbolized by the aliens in 2001 placing a monolith on The Moon, as it represented an important milestone in human progress.

On the flipside, with 911 troothery, people just can not accept that a bunch of a-rabs could slip through our defenses. We're too proud to admit our weaknesses. So we have to invent an inside-job to have engineered it, otherwise we'd feel too vulnerable to another attack. The devil you know is preferable to the devil you don't know, basically. There is no reasoning with Al Qaeda but you can always kick the bumbs out of washington.


On your 1st point Mos, I think the opposite is true, people found it very easy to leap from seeing big rocket launches on TV to believing there was no further substantial barrier to going to the moon. The Van Allen radiation belt was far from common knowledge at the time. So was the risk of space debris or asteroid collision.

My number 1 reason for doubting the story is the lack of any visible landing crater under the lander on any shots I have seen. I would appreciate if anyone can show me a picture of this landing crater.

Your second point is a gross over simplification. Implying childish motives to those who question the veracity of the official 9/11 story. There are piles of perfectly logical holes in this story.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby americandream » Thu 29 Apr 2010, 00:50:59

The global capitalist elite are essentially a bunch of old fashioned opportunists. And like all opportunists, we find a variety of factions hard at work securing and enhancing their place at the planetary pig trough of wealth. Empire is often a rather effective means for preserving hierarchical privilege. We have our Imperial order, we call it the "West", the ME has its own, it's called Islam, and we find the newly emerged empires of the Russian Federation and the Peoples Republic of China on the contemporary world stage.

It should not come as any surprise to any serious political analyst that Islam will have a distinct military profile, synonymous as it is with the use of proxies and guerilla warfare in contrast to our (publicly acknowledged (you will note my qualifier)) conventional profile. I don't think one can term an imperial systrem and it's natural tendencies, conspiratorial. These tendencies are as natural as our breathing. If they involve misinformation and hubris, hey, thats hardly surprising, is it? What do you expect. Securing privilege and wealth and its associated intrigues is as old as our earliest of empires.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'O')n the flipside, with 911 troothery, people just can not accept that a bunch of a-rabs could slip through our defenses.
I accept that some Arabs may have penetrated our rather rudimentary airport security pre-911. They were a handy excuse---have you ever heard of the Gulf of Tonkin? I do not dismiss guerrilla movements against entrenched militaries. I am old enough to remember Vietnam and savvy enough to know what will probably happen in Afghanistan.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'W')e're too proud to admit our weaknesses. So we have to invent an inside-job to have engineered it, otherwise we'd feel too vulnerable to another attack. The devil you know is preferable to the devil you don't know, basically. There is no reasoning with Al Qaeda but you can always kick the bumbs out of washington.
The bumbs will go to unholy lengths to stay in power.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Skeptics of the World, Unite!

Unread postby americandream » Thu 29 Apr 2010, 01:09:08

I suspect the Soviets and communist movements wordwide would have blown the lid on this were it a hoax.

The American moonlanding was a fine human achievement and the result of significant effort, sacrifice and funding by the ordinary, hardworking American. Lets not sully it with our disillusion.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'M')y number 1 reason for doubting the story is the lack of any visible landing crater under the lander on any shots I have seen. I would appreciate if anyone can show me a picture of this landing crater.
Moon gravity is 1/6 earth gravity. The rockets were shut down sooner, and the craft essentially floated to the surface. That works for me.

We routinely send space craft hundreds of miles above the planet earth, mostly beyond the pull of earth gravity. Why is it hard to believe that we could easily coast the rest of the way--all the way to the moon?
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron