by pup55 » Wed 31 Mar 2010, 12:06:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he prospects of the Washington Department of Energy on oil now sound far more pessimistic than the kind of analysis the DoE used to release not so long ago. In 2004, under the Bush administration, the DoE published a study in which oil production was supposed to be able to rise strongly at least until 2037.
Sorry to double-post but I am compelled to rant about this a little. The massaging of data, making rosy-scenario assumptions, and whitewashing of government reports has gone on for some time as we well know.....
But can you see how dangerous it is to politicize this kind of analysis? What you're saying is, that your near-term outlook on the future, along with all of your contingency planning, is 100% dependent on some political hack in the white house dictating the report to you so as to either make the previous party in power look bad, or make your own party look good. The unemployment numbers as well as the GDP estimates are being massaged just as badly or even worse, because of course they are more widely followed.
Chances are, the best of this data is coming from elsewhere, like the CIA, for example, or the DoD, and the "truth" as it were, is never seeing the light of day.
BTW both parties are equally guilty of this. It ought to be a felony to massage this data. It makes any kind of sane government policy change practically impossible.