by Sixstrings » Sun 28 Feb 2010, 20:34:48
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', 'Y')ou claim to take the moral high ground, then justify places like SeaWorld by saying "but, but, they're neat!" Pathetic.
Yes, zoos and animal-based circuses should be shut down. All of them. They belong with other barbaric relics like
bear-baiting and bullfighting. But maybe you think those are "pretty darn cool," too.
Well, here's the thing. If you really care about whales, you have to realize that Sea World is at the bottom of the list of threats.
Each year, fishing nets kill 300,000 whales and dolphins. So in fact, fish eaters are much more cruel to whales than Sea World is. Sea World is just raising a few orcas in captivity, whereas everyone who eats fish is responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of these marine mammals.
And so, a handful of whales in captivity doesn't bother me anything near as much as the fishing net problem, and even worse outright whaling -- I think Japan alone kills 600 whales per year (including humpbacks).
Those are the real sources of cruelty to whales -- whaling fleets and commercial fishing nets. Not Sea World. My only beef with Sea World is that they don't have a method of stopping these whales in an emergency. They really ought to figure that out, or don't do anymore performances. That's what got on my nerves, that there was't any discussion in the news media about how Sea World could have saved the victim. And that so many people are all excited about a few whales in captivity while having nothing to say about the real threat to whales (large scale commercial fishing).