Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

More Duggars?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

More Duggars?

Unread postby hillsidedigger » Thu 11 Feb 2010, 10:27:40

On the cover of People magazine yesterday I saw JimBob and Michelle Duggar claiming that even though their troubled pregnancy with their 19th. child has resulted in a preemie still barely hanging onto life with Michelle also considerably damaged they still desire and will try to conceive even more children.
Last edited by Ferretlover on Thu 11 Feb 2010, 13:04:51, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Although energy is required for procreation, it is the wrong type of Energy for this forum. Moved to Open.
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.

Re: More Duggars?

Unread postby mos6507 » Thu 11 Feb 2010, 10:29:14

More long-pork for the apocalypse.
mos6507
 

Re: More Duggars?

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 11 Feb 2010, 12:25:02

It's the Quiver-Full movement

Image

"Dedicated to providing encouragement and practical help to those who are striving to raise a large and growing, godly family in today's world!"

http://www.quiverfull.com/
Ludi
 

Re: More Duggars?

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 11 Feb 2010, 13:06:44

Ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous.

On a related note, why couldn't at least one follower of this movement be physically attractive? It could do wonders for their cause (which seems to be acquiring notoriety and $$$) if the result were 18 little Brads and Angelinas running around. Instead, the Earth gets an overabundance of very bland breeding stock. :x
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: More Duggars?

Unread postby TWilliam » Sun 14 Feb 2010, 23:28:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'O')n a related note, why couldn't at least one follower of this movement be physically attractive? It could do wonders for their cause (which seems to be acquiring notoriety and $$$) if the result were 18 little Brads and Angelinas running around. Instead, the Earth gets an overabundance of very bland breeding stock. :x

That's because the anorexic waif that is considered to be today's feminine ideal makes for poor breeding stock. Women with (relatively) narrow hips, low bone mass and chronically underweight bodies generally don't carry or birth children well. Trying to have a large family would very likely kill them, or at least drastically reduce the span of their reproductive years...
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron