Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Jotapay » Sat 23 Jan 2010, 01:45:43

You people who want communism/socialism, just make sure you take your Expletive deleted. Wall Street bankers, unions and other "too big to fail" corporations with you, who want socialism at the expense of the working man's taxes. You're all the same ilk and deserve each other.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 23 Jan 2010, 10:42:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Homesteader', 'I') would say that is pretty much tribalism, a social system which has worked well
Define working well. Afghanistan? Baghdad? If we slide back to tribalism, it's going to be more like south central LA than Pandora.
The "tribes" of Afghanistan and Baghdad are chiefdoms. Some people confuse the word "tribal" with "band." Band society is probably what humans are best adapted to, a non-hierarchical, egalitarian society of small groups. link
Ludi
 

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Homesteader » Sat 23 Jan 2010, 13:01:19

Most people attach "primitive", "barbaric" and a lot of other junk to tribal, which is a mistake.

Some people just love big government. So be it. . . not my cup of tea. There isn't one right way to live, although tptb want us to think so, and this global society has a meme that says this is the one right way, and death to all who disagree.
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill

Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Homesteader » Sat 23 Jan 2010, 13:13:01

A few other references to tribalism:

"In the past 50 years, anthropologists have greatly revised our understanding of the tribe. Franz Boas removed the idea of unilineal cultural evolution from the realm of serious anthropological research as too simplistic, allowing tribes to be studied in their own right, rather than stepping stones to civilization or "living fossils." Anthropologists such as Richard Borshay Lee and Marshall Sahlins began publishing studies that showed tribal life as an easy, safe life, the opposite of the traditional theoretical supposition. In the title to his book, Sahlins referred to these tribal cultures as "the Original Affluent Society," not for their material wealth, but for their combination of leisure and lack of want.

This work is for the progression of humanity and the enlightenment of ourselves, such as that advocated by John Zerzan or Daniel Quinn. These philosophers have led to new tribalists pursuing what Daniel Quinn dubbed the "New Tribal Revolution". The new tribalists use the term "tribalism" not "

"According to a study by Robin Dunbar at the University of Liverpool, primate brain size is determined by social group size. Dunbar's conclusion was that the human brain can only really understand a maximum of 150 individuals as fully developed, complex people (see Dunbar's number). Malcolm Gladwell expanded on this conclusion sociologically in his book, The Tipping Point. According to these studies, then, "tribalism" is in some sense an inescapable fact of human neurology, simply because the human brain is not adapted to working with large populations. Beyond 150, the human brain must resort to some combination of hierarchical schemes, stereotypes, and other simplified models in order to understand so many people."

Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribalism

There is volumes of information out there on the topic if you care to look.
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill

Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 23 Jan 2010, 13:45:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Homesteader', 'M')ost people attach "primitive", "barbaric" and a lot of other junk to tribal, which is a mistake..
I think so too. I'm not convinced a band/tribal egalitarian society must be "primitive" or that all Neo-tribalists are primitivists. I'm not a primitivist, though Jason Godesky is. Daniel Quinn certainly isn't. Tribalism/band society is just a system of social organization, it doesn't define how you make your living. That is, tribes/band needn't be hunter-gatherers, in my opinion. They might be horticulturalists.
Ludi
 

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Homesteader » Sat 23 Jan 2010, 13:54:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I') think so too. I'm not convinced a band/tribal egalitarian society must be "primitive" or that all Neo-tribalists are primitivists. I'm not a primitivist, though Jason Godesky is. Daniel Quinn certainly isn't. Tribalism/band society is just a system of social organization, it doesn't define how you make your living. That is, tribes/band needn't be hunter-gatherers, in my opinion. They might be horticulturalists.
Well put.
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill

Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby lper100km » Sat 23 Jan 2010, 15:24:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', 'L')ess odourous still is the "old" (20 or so years ago) European mix of capitalism and socialism. Gave us (UK) things like the National Health service, state (public) owned industries, energy, services, railways etc.
These have all now (except the NHS) been "sold off" to the money boys, who take the profits leaving the people to subsidise the losses (i.e. British railways, buses). So our European modern political system is now starting to stink.
Your timing is off by decades Gasmon and has little to do with the EU.

The Labour Govt of 1946 under Clement Attlee gave the UK it’s first taste of nationalized industry. In short order, the UK found the health service, the steel industry, the transportation industry – rail and road, the education system, coal mining, the electrical generation and distribution system, natural and coal gas distribution to name the most obvious were the first to become managed under the benevolent eye of the national government. For the next twenty years, as the electorate voted alternating conservative and labour governments to power, there were confusing and economically destructive periods of de-nationalisation and re-nationalisation of selective elements of this pantheon of industry.

The UK economy languished for decades under the financial weakness induced by WWII, the tax load imposed to support this ongoing mess and the rise of powerful unions effectively encouraged by their political support of the Labour Party. This was a very bad time in the UK. People were confused, angry and eventually so worn down by the constant daily fight to survive the myriad daily privations, that most sank into a kind of mindless routine just to get by. The more motivated and qualified fled the country in what became widely dubbed as the ‘brain drain’ in the inept government of Harold Wilson of the 60’s, despite severe restrictions on currency movement. The USA, Canada and Australia had jobs to offer any professionally qualified person in those years and were actively recruiting, even with paid passage.

Like it or not, Maggie Thatcher was the only leader with enough clout and guts to put an end to most of the ills that plagued this period and restore a sense of pride and purpose that had long lain fallow.

So Gasmon, I expect you are too young to have experienced all of that except maybe the past twenty years. As you say, most of the nationalized industry has reverted again to private ownership, though on a scale that can only be described as ‘national’. The difference is that they are owned by ‘stakeholders’ and shareholders instead of being managed by a government department. In a curious way, the years of nationalization created consolidated infrastructures that made their eventual disposition attractive as a business venture.

There are millions of reasons as to why centrally controlled resources and services are desireable and millions more as to why they don’t succeed to expectation. There are millions of reasons why corporate control of resources and services are desireable and millions more why they don’t succeed to expectation. Take your pick. This is not necessarily the application of some ‘ism’, but more likely rooted in the perverse nature of the individual and collective psyche. Whatever the ‘system’, the focus should be on outcomes and accountability, but of course, it never is.
User avatar
lper100km
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Over the tracks, left under the overpass, right, third boxcar on the left, ask for Jack
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Last_Historian » Sat 23 Jan 2010, 16:05:58

The real problem with returning to tribalism / primitive is not that it's a "bad" way of life, but that if everyone were to do so, the Earth would only be able to support a tiny fraction of today's population. Say what you will about large hierarchies (bureaucracies, businesses, etc), but they are an indispensable organizing force for maintaining the global carrying capacity high enough to support today's 7bn people. Lots of Roman citizens came to hate the Empire's exorbitant taxations and requisitions towards the end, but when its shell finally collapsed they got the Dark Ages.
my Sublime Oblivion blog on Eurasia, geopolitics, and peak oil.
You can also follow me on Facebook and Twitter.
Forests precede civilizations and deserts follow them. - Chateaubriand.
User avatar
Last_Historian
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue 10 Feb 2009, 19:01:14

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 23 Jan 2010, 19:04:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Last_Historian', ' ')they are an indispensable organizing force for maintaining the global carrying capacity high enough to support today's 7bn people. .
That "carrying capacity" of modern agriculture is an illusion.
We don't know what the carrying capacity is for a different way of life, say, for instance, horticulture.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Homesteader » Sun 24 Jan 2010, 17:09:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Last_Historian', 'T')he real problem with returning to tribalism / primitive is not that it's a "bad" way of life, but that if everyone were to do so, the Earth would only be able to support a tiny fraction of today's population.
What evidence do you have that efficiency would go down? Why do you define it as "returning"? Why can't it be something to move forward to? Why is more complex better? Studies show that complex societies continue to become more complex less and less efficient until they fail. What is so good about that?
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill

Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby mos6507 » Sun 24 Jan 2010, 20:25:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Homesteader', '
')What evidence do you have that efficiency would go down? Why do you define it as "returning"? Why can't it be something to move forward to? Why is more complex better? Studies show that complex societies continue to become more complex less and less efficient until they fail. What is so good about that?


I took a look at Last Historian's essay on his website and I can say that the concepts are so obtuse and boroque that I doubt anyone reading it will ever understand what the hell the guy is trying to say, let alone join up.

It kind of reminds me of the mental backflips that were necessary to explain the movement of the planets before they finally conceded that the SUN is the center of the solar system, not the earth.

To me, truth has to be simple and elegant.

If you were to sum up the truth of where we are in one phrase, it would be koyaanisqatsi, "life out of balance".
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 24 Jan 2010, 20:33:17

I watched the old "Outer Limits" episode "O.B.I.T." last night and thought about Last Historian's idea that surveillance would make the system work. I recommend this episode to him, as research. :)

(for those who don't know, the episode is about a device which allows total surveillance of anyone whose "code" is programmed into the machine. People don't know how they are being watched constantly, but it leads to total demoralization and suicide among the people being surveilled. A great plan if you want to destroy a society!)
Ludi
 

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby POAlex » Tue 26 Jan 2010, 17:58:04

Haven't we learned the horrors of Communism?
User avatar
POAlex
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 26 Jan 2010, 18:07:59

Any government of any colour that tries to micro manage people can go to hell. If they can't convince people to do right by their own free will there is no hope the system will work. I think LH skipped both classical litterature and history classes.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby mos6507 » Tue 26 Jan 2010, 23:33:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'A')ny government of any colour that tries to micro manage people can go to hell. If they can't convince people to do right by their own free will there is no hope the system will work. I think LH skipped both classical litterature and history classes.


Does that extend to rationing measures? You do realize where we're headed, don't you?
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Narz » Wed 27 Jan 2010, 01:05:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'I')f they can't convince people to do right by their own free will there is no hope the system will work.

No one really has "free" will. Their minds are clouded with preconceived notions before they're even in grade school. Not to mention natural human weaknesses (physical, mental & emotional) that are exploited by people of influence without them even realizing it.

People need coercion. Coercion is inevitable. You could almost say education is coercion, enough education & training & it becomes impossible to make the same choices as someone who is uninformed. That is if you have the power to. But at least if you know what's right you'll have the drive to & drive is almost more important than power (power without drive fades & drive without power... well you may die trying but at least you've got purpose).
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Wed 27 Jan 2010, 02:36:33

I am talking about litteral freedom, as to move. An example of evil micromanagement is China where one must apply months in advance for a permit to catch a train to another city. The former USSR used to do the same. I am talking about needing a passport and a visa to travel in ones own country. (Even if it's by bicycle from soup kitchen to soup kitchen).
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Last_Historian » Wed 27 Jan 2010, 03:00:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'I') took a look at Last Historian's essay on his website and I can say that the concepts are so obtuse and boroque that I doubt anyone reading it will ever understand what the hell the guy is trying to say, let alone join up.
If you think my writing is obtuse, acquaint yourself with the likes of Hegel or Heidegger, or to take a more modern example Zizek or Baudrillard. These guys really take the cake.

That said, I'm not a huge fan of making everything crystal clear and precise. If you elucidate too much, people are just going to read through it, but not think about it. Thinking about things is the road to real understanding.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'A')ny government of any colour that tries to micro manage people can go to hell. If they can't convince people to do right by their own free will there is no hope the system will work. I think LH skipped both classical litterature and history classes.
1. To the contrary, literature and history is chock-full of idealists who were forced into becoming more pragmatic and coercive when they acquired real political responsibilities.

2. Even if it is possible to change human psychology into doing "right by their own free will" (that btw is just a reworking of the old concept of "Christian liberty"), it will take two generations. To take the Soviet example, it took two generations to transform the bulk of society from rural traditionalism to urban secularism (that that despite state-backed propaganda). Needless two say, we cannot afford to wait two generations.

3. The possibilities opened up by modern surveillance, database, networking, and cybernetic technologies marks a historical discontinuity that may make micro-managing human affairs feasible and in fact very efficient.
my Sublime Oblivion blog on Eurasia, geopolitics, and peak oil.
You can also follow me on Facebook and Twitter.
Forests precede civilizations and deserts follow them. - Chateaubriand.
User avatar
Last_Historian
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue 10 Feb 2009, 19:01:14
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Pretorian » Wed 27 Jan 2010, 04:31:57

Last_Historian, whats the difference between Green Communism and Green Fascism?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests