Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

2010 - A Time to Die ?

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Rich Cling to Life to Beat Tax Man

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 02 Jan 2010, 14:47:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', '
')
Capitalism is dead, The Top .01% are as wealthy as they've ever been. That includes the Roman Senators.



well no family stays rich forever, including Roman senators. Each emperor or tribune had a stack of them executed.

Frankly i see no point of being rich at deathbed.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 02 Jan 2010, 15:35:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', 'I') would like to offer a very lovable and respectful efarmer to the wealthy
"it's a great year to die" persons who have not had the pleasure nor the
joyful experience of conceiving or rearing an efarmer of their own.

I am now officially up for adoption.



7 years old boy married an 80 years old woman. And when he died, she got all his money.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: Rich Cling to Life to Beat Tax Man

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 02 Jan 2010, 16:59:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', 'L')et's kill the rich and steal their property! If we all vote to do it then it's ok! .



Who is advocating that besides you?
Ludi
 

Re: Rich Cling to Life to Beat Tax Man

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 02 Jan 2010, 18:48:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', ' ')Let's kill the rich and steal their property!



Steal? When you steal your victim is alive and unthreatened. When its dead its more like an expropriation. Anyways do dead people have property rights? Really?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', ' ')If we all vote to do it then it's ok!


it would be democratic, yes
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: Rich Cling to Life to Beat Tax Man

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sat 02 Jan 2010, 19:30:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', ' ')Let's kill the rich and steal their property!



Steal? When you steal your victim is alive and unthreatened. When its dead its more like an expropriation. Anyways do dead people have property rights? Really?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', ' ')If we all vote to do it then it's ok!


it would be democratic, yes


Democracy shouldn't mean tyranny of the majority.

If 51% of Germans vote to kill all of the Jews and steal their property, does that make it acceptable?

What if 95% of Germans vote to do this? 99%? 99.99%?

Godwin's Law doesn't apply here because this is a valid comparison. People often vote themselves tyrants. The tyranny that results from their votes is immoral and unacceptable. We can't excuse this tyranny just because it's "what the people wanted". If you don't like the example of Nazi Germany, take a look at Mugagbe's Zimbabwe or Putin's Russia. Both leaders are powerful, popular, and horrible. Yet, they were democratically elected and would win in a landslide in any fair election held today or any day. Does that make it okay?

There are certain moral laws that exist outside of democracy.

With regards to the estate tax in general. I recognize that the federal government needs revenue. I also recognize that every tax has a negative impact on the economy and society in general.

Thus, we must find means of funding the necessary functions of the state (military defense, courts of law, street lights, etc.) while doing the least damage.

Taking some of the Walton's estate seems like a non-distorting way of doing this.

We don't get to choose between "Death Tax" or "No Death Tax". We have to replace the revenue somehow. Especially when we're looking at trillion dollar deficits as far as the eye can see.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Rich Cling to Life to Beat Tax Man

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 02 Jan 2010, 22:59:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')
Democracy shouldn't mean tyranny of the majority.

If 51% of Germans vote to kill all of the Jews and steal their property, does that make it acceptable?

What if 95% of Germans vote to do this? 99%? 99.99%?

Godwin's Law doesn't apply here because this is a valid comparison. People often vote themselves tyrants. The tyranny that results from their votes is immoral and unacceptable. We can't excuse this tyranny just because it's "what the people wanted". If you don't like the example of Nazi Germany, take a look at Mugagbe's Zimbabwe or Putin's Russia. Both leaders are powerful, popular, and horrible. Yet, they were democratically elected and would win in a landslide in any fair election held today or any day. Does that make it okay?

There are certain moral laws that exist outside of democracy.




So what are they, these mystic moral laws? Jewish 10 commandments? other editions of them like deuteronomy 5.6-21, exodus, ets? Sharia laws? Democracy is either exist or it doesnt. There is no " I'll go with the majority if it suits me and if it doesnt, thats an infraction on certain moral laws respected by me so I put a guy I like on the throne who is supported by 0.05% of the population, by all means I find to be necessary"
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Cloud9 » Sat 02 Jan 2010, 23:31:05

The right to life, liberty and property. These are our rights the moment we crawl out of the egg.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 02 Jan 2010, 23:56:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'T')he right to life, liberty and property. These are our rights the moment we crawl out of the egg.



Is this from the constitution or something? It can be amended at will. Cloud9, mind me asking where did these rights came from ?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Cloud9 » Sun 03 Jan 2010, 00:44:46

The right to life, liberty and property are natural rights. They are inalienable. They exist simply because we are human. They are not derived from any state or central authority. They are our birth right. With our first breath, these rights become ours. We have a social contract with our government. We give our government what power we see as necessary to protect our natural rights. When that government fails to protect these rights, as this one has, it is our right to alter or abolish this government.

http://jeffersoncountry.lib.virginia.ed ... ff0100.htm
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 03 Jan 2010, 12:12:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', ' ')When that government fails to protect these rights, as this one has, it is our right to alter or abolish this government.



Which of these rights have you lost due to the current government? Or, are you concerned about someone else having lost these rights? What are you doing to alter or abolish this government?

Thanks.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Pretorian » Sun 03 Jan 2010, 13:14:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'T')he right to life, liberty and property are natural rights. They are inalienable. They exist simply because we are human. They are not derived from any state or central authority. They are our birth right. With our first breath, these rights become ours.


Well ok, but there is a number of questions remains unanswered.. Like what happens if rights of one person damage rights of another? For example, a baby with birth defects is born after 5 months of gestation. Who is supposed to shell out 2 million to prop that baby up, and 50k per year or so till it finally dies? When did these rights took off? With the birth of the first human? What about his parents? Did they have any rights? What about other species that are extinct but still considered to be " human" ? Who was watching out for all their rights to be taken are off? And if nobody was doing that and 99.99% of all humans that ever lived didnt have their rights respected why it should be any different with 0.01% of humans that ever lived? Something is fishy about the whole this " natural rights" thing. This thing reeks of self-interest. I think someone made up the whole thing. I think I even know who.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Pretorian » Sun 03 Jan 2010, 17:06:00

here is a good analisis of what rights are


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F1Lq1uFcAE
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Cloud9 » Sun 03 Jan 2010, 18:23:23

You pose what appears to be a hard question. It is not the question that is hard; it is the answer that is hard. The responsibility for the child falls on the two people who chose to have sex. Their obligation to the child extends to their capacity to sustain the unsustainable.


http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtreat.htm

To alter this government, I am voting against every sitting incumbent. If we all do that, change will take place.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Pretorian » Sun 03 Jan 2010, 19:51:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'Y')ou pose what appears to be a hard question. It is not the question that is hard; it is the answer that is hard. The responsibility for the child falls on the two people who chose to have sex. Their obligation to the child extends to their capacity to sustain the unsustainable.


Well what if they are not able to pay for that? What if a woman was raped and rapist is either not found, or again not able to pay? What if both parents die? What if the fact of birth defects/prebirth is none of their biological/behavioral fault? What if the baby is in pain regardless of quantities of treatments? When does he/she can decide that he/she had enough of it and yank the cords off? At 25yo? 21? 18? What if its in constant pain but doesnt have the mental capacity to realize what is going on?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Cloud9 » Mon 04 Jan 2010, 12:01:36

The moral thing for us to do would be to donate to her need. The immoral thing to do is to put a gun to my head and force me to donate. I have walked up to a homeless man and put a $50 bill in his hand. A neighbor and I roofed a widow’s house. I held a barbeque and fed 1,200 people to raise money to help a fellow get a lung transplant. These things I did because they were the right thing to do. There are millions of others just like me. The government will demand $10 in taxes that require $15 in administration fees andl wind up giving $5 to a person who is not in need.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Rich Cling to Life to Beat Tax Man

Unread postby rangerone314 » Mon 04 Jan 2010, 12:13:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'M')y goodness, the love of money truly knows no bounds.

I have no problem with the sick and elderly planning their estates as they choose (though traveling to Holland for tax-related euthanasia is really disturbing). The problem I have here is the ominous prospect of what happens a year from now as the tax comes back into effect -- we're going to have people pulling the plug on grandma just to save on taxes.

Wow...

Thailand is known for having "sex tourists". I suppose maybe Holland may become known for having "death tourists".
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 04 Jan 2010, 12:44:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'T')he immoral thing to do is to put a gun to my head and force me to donate.



Nobody has done that to you. Nobody will.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Pretorian » Mon 04 Jan 2010, 13:55:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'T')he immoral thing to do is to put a gun to my head and force me to donate.



Nobody has done that to you. Nobody will.



well actually they do it all the time, how do you think these bills are paid if not through his taxes? He is not forced to pay taxes? Well, not with a gun to his head of course, what would be a better hyperbole for a prison... oh I already know , but I'll guess I better skip the anatomy.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby MathMurderer » Mon 04 Jan 2010, 20:33:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'T')o alter this government, I am voting against every sitting incumbent. If we all do that, change will take place.

Most incumbents have either a (D) or an (R) next to their name. If you and most other Americans vote for the candidate from the other major party, then you'll get a new set of elected officials, but they'll still be composed overwhelmingly by Democrats and Republicans. I personally wouldn't expect much change in that scenario.
If you want real change in politics you'll probably have to vote for independents and candidates from small parties. But a word of caution needs to be added here as well. In such a scenario you'll get a good number of very capable and decent people, but you'll also get more than a fair share of dangerous nutjobs. This is a risk that I would be willing to take, but some of the consequences would probably be undesirable.
||\\ .. //|| ||\\ .. //|| There is nothing left in my right brain.
||. \\// .|| ||. \\// .|| There is nothing right in my left brain.
User avatar
MathMurderer
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Erfurt, Germany
Top

Re: 2010 - A Time to Die ?

Unread postby Cloud9 » Mon 04 Jan 2010, 22:13:34

Nut jobs are par for the course. Ron Paul was considered a nut job for years. Now more and more of us think he makes sense. We have to do something to end the business as usual atmosphere in Washington.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron