Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Healthcare Industry Thread (merged)

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 03:07:28

On average I earn $1,000 AUD per week while working; I spend average 4 months O/S each year. As I work remote I get discounts on tax. As I am in the health sector I get $15kpa tax free salary sacrifice. I end up paying $2,500 a year tax. Out of $35kpa. This includes the medicare rebate. So in reality I am paying less than 8% tax. This is in Australia.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 03:26:41

SeaGypsy,

You aren't a good example of a typical Australian household. 8)
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby Revi » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 04:48:57

I plan on dumping all my assets the second I retire or get sick. There is no point in having anything here in the US anyway.

We work and pile up a few possessions, then when we get sick (which is inevitable) they get taken away and re-distributed to others who lose those assets when they get old and sick, and the cycle continues.

It's like socialism, but we feel like we're playing the game for a while.

Why do you think so much is in corporate ownership here in the US?

Corporations don't get sick.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby HeckuvaJob » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 05:39:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'W')ell...in my state the welfare moms still get their babies paid for by the state...so as far as i see, the system is still a complete failure.

You can't be serious. St. Ronald warned us about that welfare queen driving around town in her Cadillac what, 30 years ago? They still haven't caught her? You keep an eye open, Frank. Remember, the poor are trying to steal wealthy peoples' money (wealthy people like you, Frank).


The entire process was doomed from the start.

Instead of asking how every other industrialized country provides its citizens with healthcare -
we should have first asked why.
User avatar
HeckuvaJob
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Pittsburgh

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby Cloud9 » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 07:42:04

Trust me they exist. They pick up their kids from school in Escalades. If you want cheaper health care, break the AmA's hold on the number of doctors we produce every year. If we had as many doctors as we have lawyers, health care would be affordable.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby HeckuvaJob » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 08:47:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'T')rust me they exist. They pick up their kids from school in Escalades.

That would make sense since it's on the way home from the bank where they were tricking loan officers into giving them mortgages they'd never be able to afford (except on Mon/Thurs which is reserved for ACORN voter fraud).

As far as scapegoats... it's tough to beat the poor.
Move over, immigrants!
User avatar
HeckuvaJob
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Pittsburgh

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby rangerone314 » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 10:39:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'T')rust me they exist. They pick up their kids from school in Escalades. If you want cheaper health care, break the AmA's hold on the number of doctors we produce every year. If we had as many doctors as we have lawyers, health care would be affordable.

I agree in principle, but I don't consider lawyers particularly affordable...
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby rangerone314 » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 10:42:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')he reforms being presented by the US government were pretty much akin to trying to solve gentrification by buying $1million condos for all of the homeless. It was a facially untenable promise that had to either get shot down now or fail in very short order because of the expense. Our healthcare system is a mess, and it desperately needs to be fixed. We need solutions that will reign in the use of overly expensive, and ineffective healthcare technologies. We can barely afford the system as it is now. Pretending we can give everyone access to the $1million ICU death without bankrupting ourselves is just silly. I'm still not sure what the game was all about, but the "reforms" the dems were fronting were never even remotely plausible.

I'm not a big fan of Republicans either, but I was amused when that Republican insisted on having the 800-page amendment read, and they guy who proposed it gave up after 100 pages (and 3 hours of reading it).

IMHO, if you can't read the bill, you shouldn't pass it.

No doubt, if I mentioned that to a senator, they'd tell me I don't understand how the senate works and there are good reasons for the way they do things - since I'm not a senator. My answer to that is simple, I'm not a rapist either even though I understand the concept of rape and have no desire to do it.

Sometimes I think they should just scrap all their procedural rules, start from scratch, and submit the results to an independent panel that will look for loopholes & inefficiency & ways to prevent special interest groups from hindering the common good, and then give it to the American people for referendum.

The problem with the American legal and political system is that it started out with a core and gradually acretes more onto it. The problem is with gradual deviation from a better way of doing things. Its like writing successively newer operating systems on top of old flawed code and it gradually gets larger and more inefficient. At some point, you just need to start over from scratch, with a top-down analysis. At the least, restructure Congress -- completely. At the best, a new constitution, with firmer protection for individual rights.

It is difficult to purge out the cr@p from an established system like ours, because you are always opposed by some group with a vested interest.

We lost healthcare because our many systems (including political) are dying a death of entrophy. Our political system needs to die of natural causes rather than be kept on life support. Then put the body in the ground as fertilizer, and see if something better can be grown.

Our entire system is like a really old person that is consuming massive resources to be kept alive. But everyone keeps running around to keep the machines humming because their livelihood depends on it.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby efarmer » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 12:39:14

Smallpoxgirl wrote:

"The reforms being presented by the US government were pretty much akin to trying to solve gentrification by buying $1million condos for all of the homeless. It was a facially untenable promise that had to either get shot down now or fail in very short order because of the expense. Our healthcare system is a mess, and it desperately needs to be fixed. We need solutions that will reign in the use of overly expensive, and ineffective healthcare technologies. We can barely afford the system as it is now. Pretending we can give everyone access to the $1million ICU death without bankrupting ourselves is just silly. I'm still not sure what the game was all about, but the "reforms" the dems were fronting were never even remotely plausible."
<end of spg bullseye post>

What she said.

I would only add that the people you think you elected to work for you
have been hired by corporate and special interests and their new mission
is a red and blue tag team match to dismantle the American middle class
for quick profits. Legislation is indeed like making sausage and now you
know where they get the meat.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby bshirt » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 20:07:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'T')rust me they exist. They pick up their kids from school in Escalades. If you want cheaper health care, break the AmA's hold on the number of doctors we produce every year. If we had as many doctors as we have lawyers, health care would be affordable.


They exist by the boatload in the midwest. I know it's PC to pretend they don't and hey I can stick my head in the sand too but....

If you want cheaper healthcare, break the lawyer's hold on liability lawsuits. We have more lawyers than than the rest of the world combined and they don't make a damn thing.
User avatar
bshirt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby bshirt » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 20:11:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')he reforms being presented by the US government were pretty much akin to trying to solve gentrification by buying $1million condos for all of the homeless. It was a facially untenable promise that had to either get shot down now or fail in very short order because of the expense. Our healthcare system is a mess, and it desperately needs to be fixed. We need solutions that will reign in the use of overly expensive, and ineffective healthcare technologies. We can barely afford the system as it is now. Pretending we can give everyone access to the $1million ICU death without bankrupting ourselves is just silly. I'm still not sure what the game was all about, but the "reforms" the dems were fronting were never even remotely plausible.

I'm not a big fan of Republicans either, but I was amused when that Republican insisted on having the 800-page amendment read, and they guy who proposed it gave up after 100 pages (and 3 hours of reading it).

IMHO, if you can't read the bill, you shouldn't pass it.

No doubt, if I mentioned that to a senator, they'd tell me I don't understand how the senate works and there are good reasons for the way they do things - since I'm not a senator. My answer to that is simple, I'm not a rapist either even though I understand the concept of rape and have no desire to do it.

Sometimes I think they should just scrap all their procedural rules, start from scratch, and submit the results to an independent panel that will look for loopholes & inefficiency & ways to prevent special interest groups from hindering the common good, and then give it to the American people for referendum.

The problem with the American legal and political system is that it started out with a core and gradually acretes more onto it. The problem is with gradual deviation from a better way of doing things. Its like writing successively newer operating systems on top of old flawed code and it gradually gets larger and more inefficient. At some point, you just need to start over from scratch, with a top-down analysis. At the least, restructure Congress -- completely. At the best, a new constitution, with firmer protection for individual rights.

It is difficult to purge out the cr@p from an established system like ours, because you are always opposed by some group with a vested interest.

We lost healthcare because our many systems (including political) are dying a death of entrophy. Our political system needs to die of natural causes rather than be kept on life support. Then put the body in the ground as fertilizer, and see if something better can be grown.

Our entire system is like a really old person that is consuming massive resources to be kept alive. But everyone keeps running around to keep the machines humming because their livelihood depends on it.



wow....what an excellent post.

Our entire system indeed does need to die. It's the only real hope we have.
User avatar
bshirt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby 35Kas » Fri 18 Dec 2009, 01:17:23

This shit ain't gonna fly. Requiring people to pay for private insurance by law is unconstitutional.

If I could afford health insurance I would already have it. If I have something serious I rather pay for the ticked and Cash for the doctor in another country. This will go nowhere...

I make less than 20K a year, honestly...
User avatar
35Kas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon 04 Feb 2008, 04:00:00

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Fri 18 Dec 2009, 02:15:31

It's ALL about who will pay for healthcare. Most people want the best health care imaginable, but don't want to pay for it, or want to pay only a token amount. Sorry, no free lunch, no free healthcare, and no unicorns either, see, because our universe runs on physical laws that imply constraints exist. Sorry, but those are the breaks in the real world.

In countries with socialized medicine that works reasonably well, like England, the health care system is badly breaking the budget, and has been for years. Of course, the public doesn't want to pay higher taxes, but their representives scream loud and long over any talk about cutting benefits. The Economist has had articles discussing this repeatedly over the last few years. And, in these systems there are serious constraints on health care spending already.

And here in Uncle Sam land, the closest thing we have to socialized medicine is medicare / medicaid. It works great, generally, for the folks who have it (like my parents, and I've seen it up close while I handled the billing paperwok for years), but the program is a financial nightmare heading for a cliff, and no politicians have the courage to try and fix it.

In my mind, I'd prefer a reasonable public system like England or Canada where the indiividual is covered up to a REASONABLE extent. This would eliminate a horrendous amount of paperwork and worry for most people.

However, if you imagine that people in the U.S. might be willing to accept that there has to be SOME kind of gating factor on cost of care, just look at what occurred when recent objective data about mammogram cost-benefit analysis came out. Women and congress (and others) tended to go berserk. Congress wanted to guarantee basically unlimited funds/attention to the issue. The right AND the left tried to exploit the issue. Extrapolate this to any number of health care issues, and you can see how unlikely the idea of rational cost containment is in this country.

If you still doubt it, watch MSNBC some night. There are almost constant complaints that some folks are against ANY lifetime cap on medical insurance. That's right - folks want to pay little or nothing and expect INFINITE potential benefits -- and much of the left says this with a straight face.

"Why we lost healthcare" is why we're "losing everything" in this country. There is a total lack of willingness to have sustainable financial or resource limits by the voters, and their representatives are too corrupt or too cowardly to show some leadership and force some sort of cost controls into the system for ANY major program.

Enjoy those free infinite benefits, and say hi to your pet unicorn for me!


edit -- fixed dyslexic typo.
Last edited by Outcast_Searcher on Fri 18 Dec 2009, 03:44:16, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby HeckuvaJob » Fri 18 Dec 2009, 03:23:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bshirt', 'T')hey exist by the boatload in the midwest. I know it's PC to pretend they don't and hey I can stick my head in the sand too but....

I will concede that there is a certain population wasting massive amounts of taxpayers' money in order to fund their own lifestyles. You can call them welfare queens if you wish, but yes, they are parasites thriving at our expense.
Best case scenario - they're abusing the system. Worst case - they're criminals.


Image
User avatar
HeckuvaJob
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Pittsburgh
Top

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby efarmer » Fri 18 Dec 2009, 13:02:53

When being robbed by corporate operative politicians, I have not been able
to decide if it feels better if they play on my fears, religious beliefs, and show
me examples of abuse by welfare recipients and illegal immigrants, or if
I prefer their counterpart, who cloak their robbery in justice and progress
for the common man and postures this common man's government as his
protector. Especially when they share almost identical corporate funding.

We are a nation that throws energy and huge resources at almost every
problem that arises in lieu of careful and long term strategy. This works
while you have cheap oil, cheap energy, and plenty of money.

I am not shocked that there isn't a strategy coming out of Congress
better than what we are seeing, the red guys holding their breath
until they turn blue because they are temporarily weaned from the
corporate tit, and the blue guys arguing until they turn red, because
they represent competing corporate interests due to the type
of health industry corporate interests in their respective home districts.
For example, what corporate interest is in Connecticut?

How many people can you place in an income generating role between
a doctor and a patient before you disconnect them?

We are answering this question in real time.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby evilgenius » Sun 20 Dec 2009, 12:45:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('like_the_dinosaurs', 'T')he only country in the western world not to have a comprohensive public health system. My Mother broke her leg not 5 months ago and within 2 hours (we live half an hour out of town) she was on an operating table.

Total cost for care : $000000000000000000000000.0000000

So you stick with your walmart hospital care if you want too.


Nonsense. You paid for that health care in the form of higher taxes.

The marginal income tax rate for Australians earning more than 35,000 Australian dollars/year is 30%. That's 32,000 American dollars.

The comparable number for Americans is only 25%.

The goods and services tax in Australia is 10% and corporate taxes are 30%. There is no GST in America and corporate taxes are 35%. A corporate tax is just a more cleverly disguised GST so the real goods and services tax rates are 40% for Australia and only 35% for Americans.

Would Americans be willing to pay Australia-level taxes for Australia-level benefits?

I don't know but it is a question that MUST be asked when discussing something like health care. If you say you want more benefits you are implicitly saying you want higher taxes. This might be a legitimate position and a good idea but it's not what American politicians say. They claim they can offer us low taxes AND high quality government services. That's just not possible.


Well, you are saying you want higher taxes or more efficient use of the money already being collected. There is a sticky tar ball surrounding higher efficiency, however, because it means different things to different people and we are talking about democracies.

That being said, is the difference in tax dollars anything like the percentage burden that Americans are currently carrying? When somebody says, "I pay $100 dollars a week for my family to have insurance and it is about the limit." usually that figure represents a much larger figure being carried by an employer. Add to that the fact that such benefits are not taxed, thus amounting to untaxed income not going into the public coffers, doing and subject to the constraints of the will of the people, and there is a substantial amount of money above and beyond what is currently being paid in taxes by employees. This huge amount of money is mostly not under anything like the system of constraints that government processes would bring to it, hence the cost the average employee and employer pay for healthcare can escalate at rates that exceed anything else, even college costs.

Don't you dare complain that the government is a terrible waster of resources and business is so efficient. There is no business around today that could handle the mandate and the complexity that governments function under. Businesses are single issue concerns that engage in their practices based upon market style negotiation and not people's rights to representation, voice or activity. When businesses confront rights usually that means there is going to be a culling, not an election.

It is fashionable to dump on 'wicked' insurance companies. The fact is the entire healthcare industry is to blame for rising costs. Every segment has gotten used to the extremely leveraged position they have the average employee and employer trapped in. As a result of this when the situation is investigated each segment of the industry is able to point the finger of blame at a different section of the business when their costing practices are examined. The result you get from such a less than obvious culprit situation is a public that wants it all to be cheaper but is afraid to change the manner in which things are paid for (for God's sake don't raise my taxes - taxing benefits - even though a tax raise would be an equitably spreadable percentage vs. a cliff size rate scale) because it will mean things they don't understand. They are more afraid of what they don't understand than living under an unjust system. That is the way people are (and always have been), the industry relies on it.
When it comes down to it, the people will always shout, "Free Barabbas." They love Barabbas. He's one of them. He has the same dreams. He does what they wish they could do. That other guy is more removed, more inscrutable. He makes them think. "Crucify him."
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.
Top

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby VMarcHart » Wed 23 Dec 2009, 19:22:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'I')f you say you want more benefits you are implicitly saying you want higher taxes. This might be a legitimate position and a good idea but it's not what American politicians say. They claim they can offer us low taxes AND high quality government services. That's just not possible.
I don't think this is a can't-have-the-cake-and-eat-it-too situation. I imagine with better management, we could improve benefits with current taxation levels.
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California
Top

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby seldom_seen » Wed 23 Dec 2009, 23:44:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HeckuvaJob', '[')img]http://www.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=315924[/img]

Atleast they're wearing their Assh*le tags.

Wtih all the money given to these chumps, you could probably build a hospital in everyone's backyard.
But how the world turns. One day, cock of the walk. Next, a feather duster.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby drew » Thu 24 Dec 2009, 01:01:08

The tall one is Jamie Dimon. Isn't he excellent? The smug look he ALWAYS has on his face tells the whole world that he truly believes that yes, he's excellent!

Drew
User avatar
drew
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Thu 22 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: canada

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby Bas » Thu 24 Dec 2009, 09:52:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HeckuvaJob', '
')
Instead of asking how every other industrialized country provides its citizens with healthcare -
we should have first asked why.


this is the most intelligent remark I've heard in the whole healthcare debate so far.

I think that in most countries it's part of the social contract between government and the people, which basically comes down to this: the government can tax if it protects the people. So protection against ill health is there for much of the same reason why countries have firedepartments, police, and armies.
Bas
 
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron