Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Healthcare Industry Thread (merged)

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: The Greatest Healthcare Reform the USA could implement

Unread postby Nefarious » Sun 27 Sep 2009, 10:17:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DomusAlbion', '
') Soon you smokers will be societal periahs; shunned by the minions


We already are.
'By the pricking of my thumbs,Something Wicked This Way Comes."
User avatar
Nefarious
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Location: The Deep South

Re: The Greatest Healthcare Reform the USA could implement

Unread postby dinopello » Sun 27 Sep 2009, 10:31:57

I've smoked cigs in the past, most recently earlier this year. I kind of enjoy it, although I usually feel a little bad right after and I always feel the need to brush my teeth immediatly after (so my dental care probably improved!). At peak I was maybe smoking a pack a week. I liked smoking after a meal or at night on the deck. If I had cigs in the house I would smoke them, but if I didn't have them, I wouldn't really crave them. The "lite" cigarettes made me feel ill, so I smoked Malborough 27 blend. If you look at their site, it seems to have less additives. Anyway, I decided to be healthier so I haven't smoked in 5 months or so. I've been spending time in a convalescent home lately visiting family. It does make you wonder what the point is in living so long. Ideally, everything would break at the same time and you die but it simply isn't the case. You go blind, you lose your mind, you can't walk, you can't breath, you are in pain, take your pick (except you don't get to choose). Is there any real study evaluating the net cost to public expenditure of someone who smokes vs someone who doesn't ? One that includes life expectancy and all the factors in both cases (including the taxes collected by the cigarette buyer ?)
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: The Greatest Healthcare Reform the USA could implement

Unread postby Thralen » Sun 27 Sep 2009, 17:41:44

As Nefarious said, we are already Pariahs. We have been for years and years... I've been smoking since age 13, on and off until 18 then pretty much straight through to 42 (a couple of 6 month quits every now and then to make sure I can put them down if I decide I want to). I can tell you that somewhere around the beginning to mid 1990s smokers became horrible Pariahs. As time goes by it progresses further and further. It has always irritated me that government would tell restaurants that they cannot have a smoking section. I mean come on, the owner should have the say and then those that don't want to eat where people are smoking can go somewhere else. Watching the UK slowly go nanny state I unfortunately see the future of the USA, assuming we don't crash first. Rights are being ignored left and right, data is being skewed in studies to support the changes in law that the government wants to make, etc... Just a horrible decline in personal liberties. I almost (note: only almost) look forward to the country crashing just to stop the erosion of personal freedoms. Not that whatever we end up with after will be necessarily better but there is always a chance...

Sorry, got off topic there but yes we've been pariahs for years already.

Thralen
User avatar
Thralen
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon 12 Jan 2009, 04:00:00

Re: The Greatest Healthcare Reform the USA could implement

Unread postby Thralen » Mon 28 Sep 2009, 04:36:37

Heh, Heh... I thought this might happen and noticed this today when I was pricing out some filter tubes online...

From one of my two favorite online tobacco stores:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')armers Gold Full Aroma Pipe Tobacco 8oz is a full flavored domestic pipe tobacco. Comparable to Farmers Gold Full Flavor Cigarette Tobacco, suitable for RYO/MYO.


Meaning that some of the tobacco companies are catering to the "roll your own" crowd (note: RYO = roll your own, MYO= make your own) by producing a pipe tobacco that is also suitable for cigarettes thereby bypassing the tax on cigarette tobacco and charging the lesser taxes for pipe tobacco.

8 oz pipe tobacco = $11.50, plus filter tubes would make the cost approximately $14.50 for 13 packs of cigarettes, or $1.12 per pack

while 6 oz cigarette tobacco = $19.95 plus filter tubes for 10 packs (is how many 6 ounces make, the 8 ounces from above will make 13 packs) totals $22.20, or $2.22 per pack

So even rolling regular cigarette tobacco is about twice as cheap as buying pre-made cigarettes but using the "pipe tobacco" brings it down to almost 1/4 the cost of buying pre-made cigarettes. While it is irritating that they tax the crap put of tobacco, their leniency towards pipe tobacco may be biting them on the ass.

Just thought I'd note that in here since I and others mentioned the taxes being paid on tobacco products.

Note: calculated costs do not include shipping costs for the tobacco and filter tubes.

Thralen
User avatar
Thralen
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon 12 Jan 2009, 04:00:00

Re: The Greatest Healthcare Reform the USA could implement

Unread postby vision-master » Mon 28 Sep 2009, 09:03:34

Why not just smoke the pipe? :)
vision-master
 

Re: The Greatest Healthcare Reform the USA could implement

Unread postby Aaron » Tue 29 Sep 2009, 08:33:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nefarious', 'S')ince I don't consider it a monkey on my back don't see why anyone else would.

Doctor asked me once if I smoked. Told her 2 packs a day firm. She said " you know it won't kill you earlier, you will just grow to be a very sick old man". I said " So you think I should bump it to 3 packs a day instead?"


Not necessarily... http://peakoil.com/psychology/heart-surgery-in-a-couple-hours-t54820-45.html

45 year old ex-smoker here.

Current breather though...
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: The Greatest Healthcare Reform the USA could implement

Unread postby careinke » Tue 29 Sep 2009, 11:36:38

After 99 failed attempts, I was able to quit my two pack a day habit, seven years ago. It was the second hardest thing I ever did, (Survival training as the Senior Ranking Officer was the hardest). I agree that generally ex smokers are as bad as a reformed whore in trying to influence other people to their newly found morality.

I REALLY enjoyed smoking. However, it really started taking a toll on my stamina and my wallet.

That said, as soon as they find a cure for cancer, emphysema, COPD, and the price drops significantly, I'm back to smoking in an instant!
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Big pharma killing for profit

Unread postby dukey » Thu 12 Nov 2009, 09:24:49

Big story in today's news in the UK is thousands of old people with dementia, are being given anti-psychotic drugs which end up killing them.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')early 150,000 dementia patients each year are given anti-psychotic drugs unnecessarily, an official review says.

The figure represents four in five of all the people who are being prescribed the drugs in care homes, hospitals and their own homes to manage aggression.

The use of the drugs - dubbed a chemical cosh - is linked to 1,800 deaths as well as leaving people struggling after strokes and falls.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8356423.stm

If in doubt, drug them !
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Big pharma killing for profit

Unread postby frankthetank » Tue 24 Nov 2009, 01:51:00

What are the drugs?

A person in my family has very advanced dementia (totally gone at this point) and has been on drugs for awhile now. All i know is that they made her gain weight...
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

"Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby Carlhole » Wed 16 Dec 2009, 02:29:41

HuffPo

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'p').s. -- Reading the comments, it's clear and understandable how raw this all is. Let me just be clear: I am not saying progressives did not put forth enough effort - not at all. I am saying progressives made a strategic mistake at the outset in trusting in the administration's political strategy and abandoning Medicare-for-all in favor of the public option, and that mistake sowed the seeds of the defeat that now looms. In no way am I letting the administration off the hook here. Given the administration's tepid support for the public option this fall (also duly noted in the comments), it is legitimate to ask whether they meant to trade away the public option all along. If so, in one sense their strategy might be said to have worked, if something in fact passes, but they tragically underestimated the appetite for real reform and squandered the opportunity this historic moment presented.


I think healthcare crashed on the general financial cataclysm of 2008. Looks like the Insurance Companies win. I wonder what healthcare will be like in 2010, 2015, 2020?
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby frankthetank » Wed 16 Dec 2009, 14:11:29

Well...in my state the welfare moms still get their babies paid for by the state...so as far as i see, the system is still a complete failure.
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Wed 16 Dec 2009, 17:15:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'W')ell...in my state the welfare moms still get their babies paid for by the state...so as far as i see, the system is still a complete failure.


If only that were satire!

I think Frank captures it perfectly as to why health care failed - there are so many people that are terrified that "THEM" will get something.

Not to pick on Frank, who may be a saint for all I know, but just to make this easier to explain, call "THEM" the "N******rs."

Lots of folks in the US will are only to happy to live like sharecroppers as long as the "N*******rs" are one rung down.

Hell Glenn Beck says it all about reparations for slavery, there is no ambiguity.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby TreeFarmer » Wed 16 Dec 2009, 23:30:19

I think a lot of people hear the promises of the progressives of how government run healthcare would be "cheaper" and yet more people would get coverage and they say to themselves; "this sounds like something for nothing." Now, being in the midst of the great housing bust "something for nothing" more people than usual are aware that you can't get "something for nothing." Therefore, they finally woke up on one issue and yelled STOP!

There is a reason for the old saying; "wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up first."

TF
User avatar
TreeFarmer
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby like_the_dinosaurs » Wed 16 Dec 2009, 23:50:21

The only country in the western world not to have a comprohensive public health system. My Mother broke her leg not 5 months ago and within 2 hours (we live half an hour out of town) she was on an operating table.

Total cost for care : $000000000000000000000000.0000000

So you stick with your walmart hospital care if you want too.
"The elite DO believe they are worshipping and are being directed by demon creatures." ALEX JONES
User avatar
like_the_dinosaurs
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat 23 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby mattduke » Wed 16 Dec 2009, 23:57:29

I can't wait for them to drop the obesity tab on me. Maybe the dollar will hyperinflate from the overspending before then.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 01:45:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('like_the_dinosaurs', 'T')he only country in the western world not to have a comprohensive public health system. My Mother broke her leg not 5 months ago and within 2 hours (we live half an hour out of town) she was on an operating table.

Total cost for care : $000000000000000000000000.0000000

So you stick with your walmart hospital care if you want too.


Nonsense. You paid for that health care in the form of higher taxes.

The marginal income tax rate for Australians earning more than 35,000 Australian dollars/year is 30%. That's 32,000 American dollars.

The comparable number for Americans is only 25%.

The goods and services tax in Australia is 10% and corporate taxes are 30%. There is no GST in America and corporate taxes are 35%. A corporate tax is just a more cleverly disguised GST so the real goods and services tax rates are 40% for Australia and only 35% for Americans.

Would Americans be willing to pay Australia-level taxes for Australia-level benefits?

I don't know but it is a question that MUST be asked when discussing something like health care. If you say you want more benefits you are implicitly saying you want higher taxes. This might be a legitimate position and a good idea but it's not what American politicians say. They claim they can offer us low taxes AND high quality government services. That's just not possible.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby MonteQuest » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 02:00:23

A recent pool showed the majority of Republicans didn't think health care for everyone should be required.

I've talked to a lot of very conservative Republicans here where I live,and they say if the uninsured want health care and can't afford it, "that they should get a better job, so they can."

Seriously.

And how many people are going to like being forced to buy health insurance?

17% of your income or you get a fine or go to jail?

I don't see a bill getting passed. DOA.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 02:32:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BlinkBlink', '
')
I've worked in both Australia and the U.S. On the surface there is less tax than there is in Australia however in practice I didn't see a lot of difference.

The U.S. has sales tax so you certainly have 'Goods' tax. There is state taxes and city taxes which do not exist in Australia.

The U.S. tax payer gets the worst value for money for the tax dollar then any other developed nation.

The Australian health case does us money. We pay 1.5% of our income once you're over the income threshold.


The GST in Australia is 10%. The average state sales tax is around 5%. Source

The US Taxpayer feeds a massive military bureaucracy that protects the commons. We pay the taxes, you get the peace. Military Spending and aMap of US military Bases.

And that 1.5% tax for health care doesn't pay the whole bill. Most of Australia's public health care is paid for out of general revenue.Source

I'm not saying Australia doesn't have good public health care. I'd argue it's probably one of the top systems in the world. The problem is that the proposals being shown to Americans are buy-now-pay-later gimmicks. Americans will not support raising taxes to a high enough level to actually provide a decent public health care system. We will end up with an inefficient and underfunded bureaucracy that sucks up dollars but produces very little health.

Government in America is inherently less efficient than government in most western countries. It's just a part of our culture.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: "Why We Lost Healthcare"

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 17 Dec 2009, 02:42:37

The reforms being presented by the US government were pretty much akin to trying to solve gentrification by buying $1million condos for all of the homeless. It was a facially untenable promise that had to either get shot down now or fail in very short order because of the expense. Our healthcare system is a mess, and it desperately needs to be fixed. We need solutions that will reign in the use of overly expensive, and ineffective healthcare technologies. We can barely afford the system as it is now. Pretending we can give everyone access to the $1million ICU death without bankrupting ourselves is just silly. I'm still not sure what the game was all about, but the "reforms" the dems were fronting were never even remotely plausible.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron