Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Collective Memory and Revenge

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Collective Memory and Revenge

Unread postby lorenzo » Tue 03 May 2005, 18:15:31

(As we remember and celebrate the 30th anniversary of the defeat of the Americans by rice farmers in Vietnam).

The history of the past six decades can be summarized as being a war between the world and the Anglosaxon Axis (America, the UK, Australia). People from all over the world, from all kinds of different cultures have had to fight these Anglosaxons who continuously interfere in their lives and politics.

From Korea over Congo to Chile, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, the Philippines, Angola, Mozambique, Somalia, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq... about everybody on the planet has had to defend themselves against the evil Anglosaxons (some for years on end - the Vietnamese - , others were lucky to succeed in throwing them out by sending local girls with kalashnikovs to defeat the US marines - the Somalians - ). Every five years since WWII, these Anglosaxons have created war campaigns, launched civil wars, destroyed countless lives, committed bloody coups d'état, installed dictators, destabilized young democracies or simply bombed people to death.

This continuous violence coming from one and the same culture is silently creating a collective world memory. All peoples of the planet are united in this regard. Go anywhere on the planet, and ask What the World Thinks of America. You'll get the same answers everywhere.

As these major research results show, America is the world's most hated nation. The Chinese may hate the Japanese, but both hate America more than they hate each other.

"Anti-Anglosaxonism" has become a truly universal trait of humankind. It is also a legitimate one.

The question now is very simple: suppose Peak Oil hits the world, will there be a kind of collective revenge, directed against the USA and its Anglosaxon allies?

Collective violence is always a very complex matter, and the psycho-social dynamics of such outbursts of revenge only come to the fore when material conditions are ripe. I fear that Peak Oil may create just such conditions.

Even though the Anglosaxons have actively tried to whipe out the memory of people who were subjected to their violence (they now even have a special Minister whose sole task is to combat world wide legitimate Anti-Anglosaxonism - her name is Karen Hughes), they underestimate the power of such collective memories. Neither a change in culture, political regime or economic wealth can whipe out collective memory. Globalization may efface many cultural habits, but collective memories are too persistent to succumb to it.

Will these collective memories converge and be "worked through" (as Freud put it), by attacking and destroying the object that drives this deep anger? Will Peak Oil create such conditions that the legitimate and latent form of global anti-Anglosaxonism, turns into an active and less legitimate form of revenge?
Last edited by lorenzo on Tue 03 May 2005, 18:25:01, edited 3 times in total.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby DomusAlbion » Tue 03 May 2005, 18:21:33

Remember that the Angles, Saxons and Jutes originally came from the continent and were German tribes
so you should include the Germans in this latest "Lorenzo" diatribe.

It is true, we are a fierce warrior race, so don't piss us off. :twisted:
"Modern Agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food."
-- Albert Bartlett

"It will be a dark time. But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting."
-- James Lovelock
User avatar
DomusAlbion
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Beyond the Pale

Unread postby killJOY » Tue 03 May 2005, 18:35:46

He cites that coke-snorting quack, Fraud, I mean Freud.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')reud understood from the very beginning that his patients were not getting cured. "As late as 1906, he writes to Jung that he has not successfully completed a single psychoanalysis." Freud's scientific contemporaries criticized him for this, but much like the gurus described by British psychiatrist Anthony Storr (p. 76), Freud resisted any criticism. He called these attacks manifestations of unconscious resistance, and claimed that critics needed to be analyzed to understand psychoanalysis properly. "What Freud is saying to the world is, `If you disagree with me it's because you're not an initiate,'" Crews says. "'You have not had the experience that creates true belief.' The whole history of religion is a history of placing faith ahead of knowledge. If you can acquire the faith, you will get the knowledge. If you can be a member, you will understand why we make the assertions that we do." For Frederick Crews, Freud was a guru with a dark pedigree.


http://cms.psychologytoday.com/articles ... 00044.html

Doesn't it sound just like that lorenzo?????Yuck!!!!
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Unread postby gnm » Tue 03 May 2005, 18:42:48

Lorenzo I will assume you are either a member of the great oppressed you speak of (and trying to make yourself feel better by not being "one of them") or you are a self-hating "Anglo" with a guilt complex. Get over it. Trying to tie violence to some misguided notion of "race" is absurd. Particularly so since "race" is a subjective construct - same species last I checked...
:roll:

wanton violence knows no "race" boundries..

-G
Last edited by gnm on Tue 03 May 2005, 18:48:19, edited 1 time in total.
gnm
 

Unread postby Wildwell » Tue 03 May 2005, 18:47:44

Proof that there are a large proportion of nutcases here: Lorenzo.

Lorenzo, all nations have a bloody history. Look at Africa, Asia, Europe, South Amercia..need I go on? The Germans have a fair sure of bloody instances in Europe, the French, Italians, and Spanish are not much better either.

So if British people are so evil (as you put it) why did we spread democracy to the world? Why are we leading the wiping out of third world debt? You couldn’t come to a more tolerant country. We’re not stringing gay people up or Jews and have twisted ourselves up in knots to accommodate different views and religions.

I’m also not aware that Americans are intrinsically evil people. Sometimes a little misguided (like all nations) but not evil. Maybe you would rather have the rule of the North Koreans, Saudis or evil dictators elsewhere?

I realise you are involved in a little mischief making just to upset a few people. I can assure you the average British person is not quite a fan of the American government as you think. It’s nothing to do with an axis of evil. I’ll tell you what it’s to do with, the Second World War when various agreements had to be signed between the British and Americans and exchange of technology (like radar, nuclear) in order to stop the Nazis pounding across Europe and then the cold war. Those agreements still stand today.

Have you any idea how much stick our governments both in the UK and the US have been given for the various wars? Britain has been the victim of Europe many times, how dare you spout such nonsense.
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby jaakkeli » Tue 03 May 2005, 20:30:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DomusAlbion', 'R')emember that the Angles, Saxons and Jutes originally came from the continent and were German tribes
so you should include the Germans in this latest "Lorenzo" diatribe.

It is true, we are a fierce warrior race, so don't piss us off. :twisted:


No no no no. In Finnish, "an Aryan" is written "arjalainen", while "one of the slave people" would be "orjalainen". That obviously reveals the ancient connection between Finno-Ugrians and Indo-Europeans. Now don't piss us off, or we'll take back what's rightfully ours! Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Slavic, Romance, who cares, we own you all!
User avatar
jaakkeli
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu 10 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Finland

Unread postby EddieB » Tue 03 May 2005, 20:32:59

To get through the coming crisis we're going to need international cooperation. Speculating on, "how much the world hates anglo-saxons," is a fruitless endevour. Sure there's a lot of anti-americanism out there. We have a lot of anti-islamism here in the States. We need to be cognizant of our faults and how we're percieved, but laying on a thick guilt trip isn't going to solve any problems.
User avatar
EddieB
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: BA PA USA

Unread postby DomusAlbion » Tue 03 May 2005, 20:34:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jaakkeli', 'N')ow don't piss us off, or we'll take back what's rightfully ours! Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Slavic, Romance, who cares, we own you all!


That would be something to see! The Fierce Finnish Five million hacking their way through the teeming "slaves" of central Europe. :lol:

They must be pissing themselves thinking about you scary Finns to the north.
"Modern Agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food."
-- Albert Bartlett

"It will be a dark time. But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting."
-- James Lovelock
User avatar
DomusAlbion
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Beyond the Pale

Unread postby Ebyss » Tue 03 May 2005, 20:46:20

Didn't all these invaders, with their evil ways, bring Christianity to the ignorant natives?
We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas.

I am only one. I can only do what one can do. But what one can do, I will do. -- John Seymour.
User avatar
Ebyss
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Ireland

Unread postby venky » Tue 03 May 2005, 22:41:25

Although the poster is way over the top, he does make an important point in that the US and its allies have been responsible for a large number of conflicts around the world the past 60 years. Anti- American and to a lesser extent anti-British feeling around the world is high and will only increase as the energy crisis unfolds, especially since the administrations of both countries seem to have decided to militarily take over the middle east.
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Raxozanne » Wed 04 May 2005, 02:30:23

I feel that the most disgusting oppression was that of the native american indians. They were free peoples that lived in balance with nature. They were expert hunters and knew their land like the back of the hand and they respected it and especially the buffalo upon which their lives depended and they knew it. Their way of life is the way I feel that we were meant to live. But they were destroyed by the English settlers who were just brutes with guns looking for a free ride because they had overpopulated their own country.
Raxozanne
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby seldom_seen » Wed 04 May 2005, 03:02:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raxozanne', 'T')hey were free peoples that lived in balance with nature. They were expert hunters and knew their land like the back of the hand and they respected it and especially the buffalo upon which their lives depended and they knew it. Their way of life is the way I feel that we were meant to live. But they were destroyed by the English settlers who were just brutes with guns looking for a free ride because they had overpopulated their own country.


I agree. We have a lot to learn from american indians. Remember though they are not the only people that lived like this. We've only had agriculture for 10,000 years. Before that all of our ancestors lived like that. For a very long long time.

There are lots of reservations in my neck of the woods. I've spent a lot of time on the Makah reservation. They have one nice chunk of land, with lots of fish just offshore. I think they're situated real well for peakoil. real well. The road to their reservation frequently washes out and they are isolated. So they can just go on their merry way and revert to the "old ways."

If a shaman or important person died they would "bury" them by placing them in a dugout canoe, placed high up in a cedar or spruce tree.

Regarding euros coming here and putting the smackdown on the native populations. I think Jared Diamond covers it pretty well in "guns, germs and steel." I don't think they were inherently "bad" and the natives were inherently "good."

Let's say the tables were turned. For one historical reason or another, american indians developed widespread agriculture, firearms and resistance to diseases found in agricultural communities. Meanwhile the europeans were living a hunter/gatherer existence.

Who's to say the american indians wouldn't have tried to expand their territory in to Europe? (expansion of territory is very common in nature among plants and animals). Point being I don't think there is any inherent goodness or badness within different ethnic populations. The ideas they get in their head though is another story.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby jaakkeli » Wed 04 May 2005, 08:04:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', 'L')et's say the tables were turned. For one historical reason or another, american indians developed widespread agriculture, firearms and resistance to diseases found in agricultural communities. Meanwhile the europeans were living a hunter/gatherer existence.

Who's to say the american indians wouldn't have tried to expand their territory in to Europe?


The Mongols! They would rule us all. And if not them, then the Arabs. Or the Tatars. There are many possible rulers to pick!
User avatar
jaakkeli
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu 10 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Finland
Top

Unread postby jaakkeli » Wed 04 May 2005, 08:28:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DomusAlbion', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jaakkeli', 'N')ow don't piss us off, or we'll take back what's rightfully ours! Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Slavic, Romance, who cares, we own you all!


That would be something to see! The Fierce Finnish Five million hacking their way through the teeming "slaves" of central Europe. :lol:


Oooh, we've tried that, although Eastern Europe is always the first target. The last time was the 1920s, with all the fascist movements popping up everywhere. Our brilliant nationalists thought that its time to get an empire that stretches to the Urals and went on to fight a few mini wars in Russia. The intellectuals came up with all sorts of ideas explaining why numbers wouldn't matter. "Slavs and Germans are so racially pure that they'll naturally lose to dynamic, mixed Finns, who are an ideal mix of Nordics, Asiatics and the Cro-Magnon man" and so on.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hey must be pissing themselves thinking about you scary Finns to the north.


I think Lorenzo is too scared to post!
User avatar
jaakkeli
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu 10 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Finland
Top

Unread postby lorenzo » Wed 04 May 2005, 14:44:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gnm', 'L')orenzo I will assume you are either a member of the great oppressed you speak of (and trying to make yourself feel better by not being "one of them") or you are a self-hating "Anglo" with a guilt complex. Get over it. Trying to tie violence to some misguided notion of "race" is absurd. Particularly so since "race" is a subjective construct - same species last I checked...
:roll:

wanton violence knows no "race" boundries..

-G


1. You are confusing race (a nonsensical category) and culture. There's definitely an Anglo-Saxon culture (even Chirac referred to it yesterday in his speech to the nation).
2. It is very legitimate to compare cultures, and in modern history, none has been so violent as the Anglo-Saxon.
3. Not many cultures on the planet worship war, patriottism and nationalism. The Anglo-Saxon does.
4. No other culture has gone to war so frequently as the Anglo-Saxon. Many do have violent histories, but their quarrels are highly localized and highly focused on specific neighbor groups (ethno-cultural wars, the usual stuff). In modern history, only the Anglo-Saxon has waged wars all over the world on a permanent basis.
5. The Anglo-Saxons have a base (an "al Qaeda" to put it in arabic) on every continent, ready to be used for its bloody invasions.

In short, you should distinguish between race and culture; you should compare cultures; and you should try to analyze the scale of the problem. Then you will spontaneously understand that Anglo-Saxon culture is the first true global war machine, that this culture actively worships war and that its nation is based on disgusting concepts like superiority, manifest destiny and a 19th century style patriottism.

Only then will you understand why the Anglo-Saxon governments feel the need to have a Minister whose specific task is to fight anti-Anglosaxonism.

(Hilariously, they picked Karen Huges, a proto-fascist neocon -- which goes to show that the Anglo-Saxons don't have a clue about how to even begin to fight or change the world's memory that is filled with hatred towards them).
Last edited by lorenzo on Wed 04 May 2005, 14:48:06, edited 1 time in total.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby lorenzo » Wed 04 May 2005, 15:07:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', '
')Lorenzo, all nations have a bloody history.


That's stating the obvious. There's a definite qualitative difference between the power structure of a hyper power and that of an ordinary colony or satrape nation.

A good debate requires a depth of analysis that goes beyond stating the obvious.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', '
')So if British people are so evil (as you put it) why did we spread democracy to the world?


When and where have British people *ever* "spread democracy"? In Kenya where you committed a holocaust? In India, where you were kicked out? In Egypt where you installed dictators? In Iraq, where Churchill, a young MP in the 1920s, called for the use of chemical weapons against the 'natives who resist our rule' and where you installed brutal tyrannical regimes?

A good debate requires piercing through your average myth.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', '
')Why are we leading the wiping out of third world debt?


You are not. You are lying. It's not because your paternalist Gordon Brown launched a marketing campaign promoting his Africa plan (all people have Africa plans) that you've actually done a thing. You've cancelled the debt of a few (as have many countries) - nothing more. For the rest, you are one of the least generous donors in Europe.
My country has cancelled the entire debt of the DR Congo. Per capita, we cancelled 600% more debt than the UK.

You don't lead, you trail behind.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', ' ')You couldn’t come to a more tolerant country. We’re not stringing gay people up or Jews and have twisted ourselves up in knots to accommodate different views and religions.


The UK is undoubtedly one of the most racist countries I've ever been to.
The xenophobic UKIP has massive support.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', ' ')I’m also not aware that Americans are intrinsically evil people. Sometimes a little misguided

I see you're trying to be ironic.
The hypocrisy of the average American is obscene. I just watched one of the hundreds of documentaries about the Vietnam war (as you know we're celebrating the defeat of the Americans). If you listen to your average American, you can tell he is truly evil. He believes in all kinds of patriottic myths; he refuses to understand that he makes mistake after mistake (some still think the Vietnam war was no mistake, and that kiling 3 million Vietnamese was worth it). 50% of them elected a convicted war criminal for president, etc...etc... America is evil.

The UK will re-elect a convicted war criminal. The UK is evil. And not very courageous.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'M')aybe you would rather have the rule of the North Koreans, Saudis or evil dictators elsewhere?

Well, you installed most of those dictators (the Saoudis, Saddam, etc... you install on average 3/4d of all the world's dictators). So no. I prefer my own democratic society. Not a war society like yours.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'I') can assure you the average British person is not quite a fan of the American government as you think.

The average British person will tomorrow elect an average war criminal to lead him.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', ' ')It’s nothing to do with an axis of evil.

There's definite proof of the existence of the Anglo-Saxon Axis. Most post-WWII wars have been joint slaughter campaigns of the UK, the US and Australia.
There's also the infamous semi-secret business network which unites these same countries and which closes deals on mega-projects like Suez, Saoudi Oil, which colonizes countries, launches civil wars, installs dictators, etc... This is all done jointly.
Finally, when it comes to military and political alliances and loyalties, the British government has consistently said that it prefers the USA over democracy.


In short, we'll talk again after your average Briton has re-elected a war criminal who should have been in jail instead of walking around in public.

I admire the Spanish people far more for their anti-fascist courage than the British people.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby lorenzo » Wed 04 May 2005, 15:09:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kochevnik', 'Y')ou people COMPLETELY MISS THE POINT (as usual :cry: )

Lorenzo's main point is that it is likely there will be a sustained and significant BACKLASH to the behavior of 'Anglo-Saxons' in the near future.

When the bully is strong, no one dares confront him. When he is weak, or is PERCEIVED as weak, he will be attacked from all sides, and vengeance will be extracted. The USA in particular is perceived as the world's biggest bully. When that country is brought to it's knees by PO, how much help do you think is going to be extended by all those nations and cultures who put up with it's continued interference and abuse ???

I would bet a lot of money that PO in the USA in particular will be greatly EXACERBATED by this backlash from the former 'oppressed' (however you define the term)..

That's the point.


Voilà, I couldn't have said it better myself.

Peak Oil's effects will cause the oppressed to seek a scapegoat, or to attack the bully when he's on his knees.

"Revenge" is a cowardly impulse, but it is a very powerful one and it should never be underestimated.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby Wildwell » Wed 04 May 2005, 16:17:26

Lorenzo, for a start *I* didn’t commit anything. So let’s grow up shall we and realise that the average person in Britain or America has little or no control over what their government decides, the same as the average German was not responsible for the first and Second World War. If you think I’m going to sit here and defend things that went on long before I was even born you’re dead wrong. What *is* dangerous though is ongoing chips on shoulders and blaming average citizens for things they have nothing to do with. Have you seen how much effort I have made to post an anti-war message and power down message? I've had no end of stick merely for an opinion. It is great disappointment that you feel fit to post bigoted and frankly narrow minded and racist remarks.

I am not lying about wiping out 3rd world debt, Britain is currently the chair of the G8 and as far as I’m aware it is the general policy of the government to lead on this issue. Personally, I’m all for it. This country is very generous in relieving third world debt either through charity or government debt relief.

UKIP do not have massive support, they have about 4% of the vote. The reason many people feel nervous about jumping in with Europe in nothing to do with racism, they want to ensure they have control over local decision making and not hand over power to a bunch of Bureaucrats in another country, The EU books have not been written off numerous times and many of out ‘reject’ politicians are highly involved. The last time we had monetary union the economy crashed and many people lost their homes, including my parents. For heaven’s sake get over your ill-informed bigotry and understand people are nervous about the situation.

Most people in the UK do not support the war in Iraq, in fact I do not know of a single person. Tony Blair has had resignations in his own government about this issue, there have been mass demonstrations and very hard questioning at every opportunity from all sides of the political spectrum over Iraq. Many people from Iraq living here actually support the war, the man had acid baths and gased his own people, hardly a hero.

I’m not here to defend the British or American government and I certain do not support secret business deals or military coups or any of the other nonsense that goes on. I’m not sure which country you are from, but I think your comments are mis-directed and selective.

There is a far share of racism in other countries, especially in France, Spain and Germany. We all have our fair share of idiots. Indeed you have shown intolerance to other people and blame them for things they have no control over. I don’t recall ever hearing anti German, French or Spanish statements made by anyone here, despite past instances of invations and disagreements.
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby Wildwell » Wed 04 May 2005, 16:32:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kochevnik', 'Y')ou people COMPLETELY MISS THE POINT (as usual :cry: )

Lorenzo's main point is that it is likely there will be a sustained and significant BACKLASH to the behavior of 'Anglo-Saxons' in the near future.

When the bully is strong, no one dares confront him. When he is weak, or is PERCEIVED as weak, he will be attacked from all sides, and vengeance will be extracted. The USA in particular is perceived as the world's biggest bully. When that country is brought to it's knees by PO, how much help do you think is going to be extended by all those nations and cultures who put up with it's continued interference and abuse ???

I would bet a lot of money that PO in the USA in particular will be greatly EXACERBATED by this backlash from the former 'oppressed' (however you define the term)..

That's the point.


Yes, well, I'm not sure the 'oppressed' are quite so innocent themselves. Looks to me like you quite like the idea of a 'backlash'. Of course the oppressed have had a whiter-than-white history of human rights, war, torture and all the rest. If you wish to side with them you must have similar moral standards.
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Unread postby lorenzo » Wed 04 May 2005, 17:30:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'O')f course the oppressed have had a whiter-than-white history of human rights, war, torture and all the rest. If you wish to side with them you must have similar moral standards.


Wildwell, sorry, but there's absolutely no comparison between what e.g. the USA has done in Vietnam and what Iran's totalitarian mollahs are doing. Really, you are comparing atomic bombs with hand grenades here.

Or take a bit of your own history. There's no comparison between what the British did in Kenya (basically they committed a holocaust, as if colonial terror alone wasn't enough) and what e.g. Arap Moi has done to the Kenyans after the British left. Stop making skewed comparisons.

And one word about personal responsability. You remind me of those Americans who we now see on our tv screens, when they remember their motives for joining the army during the Vietnam war. They all said: I had no choice, everyone was going to the war, we had to do it, they pressured me into it, etc... All bogus. They could have said: fvkk off, I won't go. ALL OF THEM could have said that. They didn't. All of them continuously hide behind larger power structures so as to hide their own responsability.

Anyway, to come back to the main point: the damned of the earth may be no angels, but their resistance and anger is legitimate. I hope you're not denying their right to justice and restitution.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron