by pedalling_faster » Fri 20 Nov 2009, 09:06:28
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'D')ebt could be a good thing, and if the value of money goes to zero, use it to pay off that loan fast before the fed revalues everything by tacking on several zeros to the principal of your mortgage.
i imagine this would rock the foundations of contract law to its core.
i'm sure i could find an attorney who would be happy to take my money to review a mortgage contract.
i guess that's part of what i'm asking. the banks aren't dummies, loaning in 2003 dollars (when a dollar would buy 1/350th ounce of gold) and repaying in 2009 dollars (when a dollar buys 1/1140 ounce of gold) seems like a losing proposition. but i guess they keep their SCORECARD in dollars - so it looks like a profit ... the bankers get their bonus', etc.
but it's not a loan an ordinary investor would make - if they knew the dollar would depreciate.
for a while (1995-2007) the banks didn't have to worry about these things, because they made money on loan origination, then re-sold the loan in mortgage-backed securities.
however, in this uncertain future, given that the banks aren't dummies (compare their bail-out to the auto-workers' bail-out), i just wonder what sneaking around they're doing in terms of mortgage-contract-writing, or perhaps in terms of influence on judges.