by davep » Tue 10 Nov 2009, 09:00:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dorlomin', 'N')on opec to peak next year EIA.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')on-Opec oil production will peak next year, the International Energy Agency says in its World Energy Outlook.
The IEA also says that post-peak gas fields are declining at a rate of 7.5 per cent, but there appears to be enough recoverable gas reserves to satisfy world demand until at least 2030.
The IEA has been criticised for underplaying the risk of an imminent oil supply. A story in The Guardian today quotes two whistleblowers who claim the agency privately believes oil production will never reach 100m barrels per day, despite its forecasts that world oil demand will reach 105m b/d by 2030.
The WEO repeats the 105m b/d forecast this year, but breaks its outlook into two scenarios: a ‘reference scenario’, in which energy use continues along its current path, and a ‘450 scenario’, in which governments make a concerted effort to limit atmospheric CO2 concentrations to 450ppm.
Under the no-change reference scenario, the IEA sees global oil rising 1 per cent per year, reaching 105m b/d in 2030. This is 1m b/d less than the agency’s forecast last year. OECD demand, in this scenario, will also fall.
Under the 450 scenario, non-hydro renewables rise from 2.5 per cent of the power mix in 2007 to 8.6 per cent in 2030.
http://blogs.ft.com/energy-source/2009/ ... next-year/ So, as we expected, they're brazenly using AGW to usher in peak oil mitigation.
We need to adhere to the 450 scenario, or we're all going to burn! Not because the other scenario is totally impossible.
I did wonder why there was more consensus than usual amongst world leaders leading up to Copenhagen.