by Outcast_Searcher » Sun 11 Oct 2009, 15:11:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Arthur75', '
')Yeah ok, but I must say I'm a bit amazed by the total lack of discussion regarding possible political measures to tackle PO on this board.
Maybe it's too late indeed, however a carbon tax is really the way to go : a movement accelerator independent of any technical solution
Good luck getting intelligent tax policy to change something as basic as energy policy in America. Our politicians are apparently cowards, idiots, or on the take. Thus nothing overly useful gets done.
Since the late 70's, once I could vote, I felt the writing was ON THE WALL as far as our long term energy woes via oil, and I have advocated a gradually rising gas tax, to encourage more intelligent energy consumption without destroying the economy.
EVERY person I talked to about this HATED the idea.
. . .
So here we are. Now the problem is so bad that gradualism won't work - it's not enough. So, with discussion about a VAT in addition to the income tax, how about an INTELLIGENT VAT, to discourage spending on stupid/dangerous stuff? Never happen, but I don't even see it get discussed. One specific example:
1). Tax the HELL out of gasoline and diesel at the pump. Add say 5 bucks a gallon, federal tax. This should get the public's attention.
2). To prevent destroying the economy, use an offsetting federal FLAT income tax credit of say $2500 per year per taxpaying family unit. (You could make SOME adjustment for the number of driving age dependents, but you get the idea).
Now look what you've done in one fell swoop -- created a HUGE incentive for EVERYONE to use less gasoline/diesel. Since every taxpaying family gets the FLAT credit, that's a big incentive for virtually EVERY gallon burned.
On the one hand, you'd get no end of crying/whining/screaming, but on the other hand, you'd get a tremendous new move toward bicycling, small and hybrid car buying, a big push for alternative cars like CNG, EV, taking public transit, living closer to work, etc, etc. The economy would shift, but the fuel savings should be just astounding.
If you want to argue the specific amount I chose - fine, but keeping it SIMPLE and BIG would really cause a difference. We could have started this 30 years ago at a DIME a year increase, and been MUCH better off by now energy-wise, but now we need something DRAMATIC to work quickly enough, IMO.
Let the shouting begin - my armor is in place...
