I thought the healthcare debate would take center court at PO.com. I must be browsing the wrong threads.
Die-off or not, I'm for an aggressive reduction in population, but planned and humane, that is.
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2009/september ... finds_.php
45K people dying annually because they don't have access to maintenance healthcare is just plain inhumane. I read once there are 280M pets in the US, from finches to "pet" horses. If we spend $10/pet/year, it's $2.8B, a whole lotta insurance premiums.
I know some believe rich countries will suffer a light die-off, but, (i) we ceased being rich years ago, and (ii) the sums of these small effects will add up to a tsunami die-off. The US has another thing coming.



