Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Everyone here seems very smart...

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Everyone here seems very smart...

Unread postby eastbay » Thu 28 Apr 2005, 16:50:31

... but apparently not as smart as this guy, who apparently pulled one of the biggest scams ever. I just stumbled across this interesting and well-footnoted article today and thought I'd toss it out to see what others here think about this.

Ah c'mon now, don't crush the messenger...lol, reply to the message please.

A quick search reveals many books and articles supporting the claim that Einstein may have wrongly took personal credit for the work of others. If true, it was not a very nice thing to do. I'm thinking of removing my small Einstein poster from my office wall... or putting one of Al Capone up next to it.

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/einstein.html

EastBay
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Unread postby killJOY » Thu 28 Apr 2005, 17:52:37

From the Nexus homepage:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')EXUS is an international bi-monthly alternative news magazine, covering the fields of: Health Alternatives; Suppressed Science; Earth's Ancient Past; UFOs & the Unexplained; and Government Cover-Ups.


*TILT* :-x
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Unread postby Specop_007 » Thu 28 Apr 2005, 18:27:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('killJOY', 'F')rom the Nexus homepage:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')EXUS is an international bi-monthly alternative news magazine, covering the fields of: Health Alternatives; Suppressed Science; Earth's Ancient Past; UFOs & the Unexplained; and Government Cover-Ups.


*TILT* :-x


Thats about all I need to read. Thanks for pointing that out, it saved me some time.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby eastbay » Thu 28 Apr 2005, 18:55:55

Oh, go get the messenger... yikes!!! I didn't bother to read or notice all that other stuff from the site.

Ok, let me try that again.

I did a google search, try this instead... the messenger may be more acceptable. Thanks in advance for your comments.

http://home.comcast.net/~xtxinc/AEIPBook.htm

EastBay
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Everyone here seems very smart...

Unread postby RickTaylor » Thu 28 Apr 2005, 19:09:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'A') quick search reveals many books and articles supporting the claim that Einstein may have wrongly took personal credit for the work of others. If true, it was not a very nice thing to do. I'm thinking of removing my small Einstein poster from my office wall... or putting one of Al Capone up next to it.


It's nonsense. Of course Einstein built on the work of people like Lorentz and Poincare (I guess that's why they call the equations you use to show how coordinates change in special relativity the "Lorentz Transformation" :roll:). Only complete crackpots don't build on the work of other scientists. The evolution of special relativity has been studied in depth; the fact that various ideas including E=mc^2 were around before Einstein isn't some secret or scandal. What Einstein did was to take the ideas that were developing and used them to create a new physics from the ground up, restructuring all the basic concepts of physics (energy, work, momentum, etc.) into a coherent new system. If that wasn't enough, he spent the decade after that developing general relativity pretty much single handedly. And of course there was his revolutionary paper on the photo-electric effect. And of course his paper on Brownian motion. The creators of the website you referenced have no idea what science is about.

--Rick Taylor
User avatar
RickTaylor
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby eastbay » Thu 28 Apr 2005, 19:24:06

Rick Taylor,

I certainly wish I had checked the site before I posted the first posting here...lol. Can we direct our attention to the ...

http://home.comcast.net/~xtxinc/AEIPBook.htm

... reference instead?? Gosh I wish we had an edit function here...

I'm really fascinated by the idea that Einstein may have stolen his ideas, as the book claims. Inquisitive minds... I suppose that's why many of us are here in the first place, because we question much of the stuff rammed down our throats every day.

Thanks,

EastBay
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Unread postby entropyfails » Thu 28 Apr 2005, 20:52:31

Anybody remember the Family Guy where they show Einstein sitting at the patent office and someone brings him a paper about relatively? Einstein shoves the guy's head in the window and steals his paper and runs off. *laugh*
EntropyFails
"Little prigs and three-quarter madmen may have the conceit that the laws of nature are constantly broken for their sakes." -- Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
entropyfails
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby eastbay » Fri 29 Apr 2005, 12:15:55

The fact that the relationship E=mc2 was not derived by Einstein is also discussed by H. E. Yves in “Derivation of the Mass-Energy Relationship” Journal of the Optical Society of America” Vol. 42. No: 8, August 1952. pp. 540-543.

http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/faq/gamma-mass-13.html

If it's true that E=mc2 should be assigned to others, then why did Einstein assume credit for this? After reading a bit more (I'm not a scientist) about this it seems quite apparent that Einstein did indeed take credit for work that should have been credited to others in his 1905 paper.

That's plagiarism. The bottom line for me is that the picture comes down.

EastBay
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Unread postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Fri 29 Apr 2005, 15:23:33

When Columbus discovered America, they said he did it, Not the guy on watch, or in the crowsnest, Columbus. In archaeological digs the find is credited to the most senior person or Doctor on the dig, not the students. Same back in the turn of the century, doctors did not get credit for their finds. that went to the person they were under the tutelage of. that's the way it had always been.

People make discoveries but it maybe that it was Einsteins thinking outside the box that put all these random connections together to create "the discovery". there is nothing wrong with that either, if nothing else you have to give the guy credit for making it ok to have hair like that. 8O
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

One more try

Unread postby RickTaylor » Fri 29 Apr 2005, 16:23:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', '
')I'm really fascinated by the idea that Einstein may have stolen his ideas, as the book claims. Inquisitive minds... I suppose that's why many of us are here in the first place, because we question much of the stuff rammed down our throats every day.

Thanks,

EastBay


I think the problem here is that people have a distorted view of what science is about. They imagine scientists inventing whole new world views out of nothing. It almost never works that way. Darwin was not the first to come up with the ideas of natural selection and evolution for example, but that hardly lessens his accomplishment.

Einstein wasn't the first to write down the equation E=mc^2, or to talk about Lorentz contraction (which is why it's named after Lorentz). Most physicists and all historians of physics are perfectly aware of this, but because the general public has a distorted idea of how science works ('oh yeah, Einsten's famous because he came up with e=mc^2'), they feel Einstein must have done something wrong when things didn't occur they way they think they did.

All scientists build on the work of others. Even Newton, perhaps the greatest physicist who ever lived, said that if he saw further than others, it was because he stood on the shoulder's of giants. Is Newton a plagiarist because he wasn't the first to assert that gravity might obey an inverse square law, and that his could account for the planets moving in ellipses for example? It's certainly false to say Newton discovered gravity.

What Einstien did was very similar to Newton. He took a number of observations that other people had made in the context of electromagnetism, and put them all together into a coherent whole; in the process, he went beyond electromagnetism to rebuild the foundations of physcis from the ground up. It's a gross oversimplification to say that he's famous because he came up with the equation "e=mc^2".

If you're interested in this, I'd recommend reading a book on the history of science. "E=mc2: A Biography of the World's Most Famous Equation" by David Bodanis looks like it might be good.

--Rick Taylor
User avatar
RickTaylor
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby smiley » Fri 29 Apr 2005, 16:27:32

Not only Pointcare but also Hendrik Lorenz contributed to Einsteins theory of general relativity and special relativity. Einstein never denied that. In fact he acknowledges both. This is very well known in the scientific world. It is no mystery.

But Einstein did not just copy their work. He took elements of their theories and completed them with his own ideas. He was the one who put the final elements in place. That's no plagiarism, that is just the way science works.

It is just that the general public wants their heroes. They want to believe in this one man singlehandedly solving the biggest challenge presented to man. And they conveniently forget about the others who contributed.

You cannot blame Einstein for that.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Unread postby eastbay » Fri 29 Apr 2005, 17:29:49

It is just that the general public wants their heroes. They want to believe in this one man singlehandedly solving the biggest challenge presented to man. And they conveniently forget about the others who contributed.

This indeed may be the bottom line. It's just a bit irritating to see him popularized and glorified for this (E=MC2) when in fact others arrived at the famous relationship well before he did. It may be that his ego prevented him from pointing his finger elsewhere with enough enthusiasm to quell the growing applause. That too would be a bit irritating.

Speaking of the 'search for hero's', as Smiley suggests, I remember as a kid everyone knew about John Glenn. But few American kids had heard of Yuri Gagarin. I don't believe I even heard his name until I was in college many years after his famous flight.

EastBay
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron