I would have to say, with reasonably high certainty, that the BBC link is a hoax.
What got me suspicious was the line, "After death, this virus is able to restart the heart of it’s victim for up to two hours after the initial demise of the person where the individual behaves in extremely violent ways from what is believe to be a combination of brain damage and a chemical released into blood during “resurrection.”"
First, the use of "it's" where the proper word would be "its." This is a common mistake in English, and one that the copy reviewers at BBC would almost certainly catch & correct.
Second, the above quote is a run-on sentence.
Third, "what is believe" is a mis-spelling, it should be "what is believed," and again, BBC editors would almost certainly catch that and fix it.
Last but not least, the reference to Condi Rice and biological weaponry is suspicious because this would have made worldwide news headlines on its own, which it did not.
So with those suspicions in mind....
1) Putting relevant words into a search box on the BBC homepage, and on the BBC South Asia page, does not yield any results.
2) The "BBC" link goes to the following address:
http://65.127.124.62/south_asia/4483241.stm.htm
This is significantly different from a normal BBC address for a story dated a couple of days ago, for example:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4482847.stm
The item above links to a story "India urged to ban toxic ship," which is also dated Monday 25 April 2005.
The difference between the two URLs is highly suspicious.
3) Parsing the URL about the legitimate BBC story, by cutting and pasting
http://news.bbc.co.uk/ into a browser, leads back to the BBC home page.
However, cutting and pasting the equivalent portions of the Cambodian story's URL,
http://65.127.124.62/ leads to a page that says "Directory listing denied. This virtual directory does not allow contents to be listed."
4) Last but not least, doing a Whois on bbc.co.uk leads to an obviously legitimate registration which is wholly British, i.e. British postal addresses and name server addresses.
However, doing a whois on
http://65.127.124.62/ leads us to the following:
Qwest Communications NET-QWEST-BLKS-4 (NET-65-112-0-0-1)
65.112.0.0 - 65.127.255.255
Integral Corporation Q0725-65-127-124-0 (NET-65-127-124-0-1)
65.127.124.0 - 65.127.124.255
If we check out Integral Corporation, we get
http://integralcorp.com, which in turn goes to a webpage that describes the company as a "computer consulting firm, systems integrator, and Internet Service Provider based in Naperville Illinois."
Now why on Earth would the BBC decide to have one of its servers hosted by an independent ISP in Naperville Illinois...? In all probability they would not.
5) Therefore I have to conclude that the "BBC" story is a hoax, fraud, lie, and damned lie. I've just sent email to BBC with the details so they can deal with it on their own.