by AgentR » Sat 01 Aug 2009, 18:08:08
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', 'S')o yes, people did used to think that peak effects would show up in the price of crude and gasoline. To claim otherwise shows a tendency towards revisionism.
No intent toward revisionism here, read what I wrote. Why are people
still harping on price. We are right in the middle of a solid counterexample; production is static or slipping, but price has fallen, not risen. Its falling because the [b]demand[/d] side of the equation has collapsed.
You posit the question about why should people have any expectation on the effects of declining production. I've always tried to express it in terms of a cap; if useful economic demand is even modestly below what the current sustained production would like to be, the price collapses; however, as economic activity increases, useful demand rises. Problems only occur when that demand taps the production cap; but once the problems start, they ramp up very, very quickly because that economically viable demand that exists lucratively at $120 a bbl; is still marginally profitable at $200; but that same $200 price would absolute crush many uses (and thus jobs) that were only marginally profitable at $150. This introduces jitter, uncertainty... which is much, much worse than high prices.
The tighter the cap on current production, the more destructive each of the "tap" events becomes, and the more intense the jitter becomes.
Its this dynamic that *I* believe makes the effects extremely unpredictable.
I could see an environment where gasoline costs $1 a gallon, and I feel I couldn't afford it.
I could see an environment where gasoline costs $20 a gallon, and I wouldn't even give it a second thought as I fill up the tank.
The fact that I see both of those as reasonable outcomes; disturbs me greatly.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.