by americandream » Thu 16 Jul 2009, 20:47:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', 'Y')ou don't understand the forces of human nature that make history what it is - in the past.
Marx's biggest problem was he did not believe humans would keep acting like humans have always acted. He was mistaken.
Marx point was rather simple when one grasps his analysis. Essentially its this:
Human consciousness is a function of the material.
For example, if the material context tends towards sustaining accumulation (by the conversion of surpluses in labour and commodities), whether it be land as in the feudal or intangibles in capital, then the human is so defined and formed, becoming essentially the effect of that primary cause, feudal man and then the capitalist, a wave like process. In other words, all the mechanisms that we take for granted such as the rules, regulations, hierarchies, value systems and infrastructure unfold within this cause and effect LOOP in progessive waves.
However, where the material context is constrained by these what were previously ample externalities, as in peak resourcing, more specifically peak oil, the impulse to equilibrium arises naturally, in effect, giving rise to another dynamic LOOP with its own wave forms, one that sets off a whole series of transactions that reflect the causality of material limits.
Within those transactions, we get wars and such like of course as the human tests the limts of the loop, but ultimately each attempted breach of the loop meets with the first cause and is this compelled to comply with its overall dynamic. Thus what we see in this more aggressive capitalism of today is the unfinished impulse wave of capital which has yet to meet its ultimate limit, resourcing.
Within that overall process, evolves the human of each epoch. As I've said, this is an objective process and drives the human state. We of course, are within the process and are buffeted along by it, unaware of the external forces that shape us.