Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Medical Monopoly

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby dukey » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 09:14:24

So I've been researching the AMA a little and came up with this gem.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n October 1976, Chester Wilk, D.C. and four other chiropractors (one later dropped out) filed suit against the AMA. The Wilk suit also named many of the nation's other most prominenet medical groups as codefendants-groups such as the American Hospital Association, the American College of Surgeons, the American College of Physicians, and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals.

The suit claimed that the defendants had participated for years in an illegal conspiracy to destroy chiropractic. On August 24, 1987, after endless wrangling in the courts, U.S. District Court judge Susan Getzendanner ruled that the AMA and its officials were guilty, as charged, of attempting to eliminate the chiropractic profession.

In 1987 (1) , following 11 years of legal action, a federal appellate court judge ruled that the AMA had engaged in a “lengthy, systematic, successful and unlawful boycott” designed to restrict cooperation between MDs and chiropractors in order to eliminate the profession of chiropractic as a competitor in the United States health care system.

During the preceedings it was shown that the AMA attempted to:

1.

• Undermine Chiropractic schools
• Undercut insurance programs for Chiropractic patients
• Conceal evidence of the effectiveness of Chiropractic care
• Subvert government inquires into the effectiveness of Chiropractic
• Promote other activities that would control the monopoly that the AMA had on health care
(This was upheld by the 7th United States Circuit Court of Appeals.)


Really the more you start researching the more bind bending it becomes. My dad broke his shoulder in 3 places, it was pretty bad, he was told he would only ever have very limited movement in it. But a chiropractor worked really hard on it. Today he has something like 90% movement in that shoulder. So I've seen first hand what they can do. To try and eliminate the profession completely seems .. somewhat criminal.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 10:42:30

11 years? Guess again. The AMA was formed back in the mid 1800's with pretty much the sole purpose of getting all other forms of medical practice banned and restricting the number of doctors so that they could get paid more. It was a cartel from the word go. If you're interested in that history, I highly recommend The Rockefeller Medicine Men. It's been out of print for quite a while, but there are used copies around.

About the only good thing I can think of to say about the AMA is that at least their history isn't quite as shady as the American Dental Assosciation.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby dukey » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 11:40:58

dentistry is something i have spent some time looking into, although i've not really looked into the ADA etc. My mum, her health was absolutely destroyed by her 10 amalgam fillings. She had cfs for 25+ years. Like 2 years after having them out she's better than ever, but still not entirely right. A life time of damage from low level chronic mercury poisoning is not easily undone. Me, I am only in my mid 20's. But i too had a chronic health melt down. I was virtually house bound for 2 years. I managed to figure out what was wrong with me, and fixing it has been a long slow journey. I basically was suffering from chronic bone infections. I had 2 horizontally impacted wisdom teeth, ie they were growing totally horizontally. My right side really wasn't that bad at all, but on my left side i had a small infection which carried on for like 3 weeks, and it left a hole in my jaw, and all the gum around the tooth disappeared.

The x-ray looked like this
Image
You can see the bone loss under the tooth. That's where infection has literally eaten away the bone. But I saw a load of dentists and they all thought this was fine. I showed doctors and one stamped her foot and said theres no way impacted wisdom teeth could be causing my health problems then went on about the fact hers were impacted. Another just flat out said, I know absolutely nothing about the mouth. My vet on the other hand, knew exactly what problems this would cause, including the abnormality which showed up on my liver function test. Anyway, I had the teeth taken out last year, my problems went, and well came back again since the bone never healed correctly. Ontop it looks like its healed perfectly, but inside the bone, its basically not healed at all. I had something called a Cavitat scan which is something the ADA has tried extremely hard to put the company that makes it out of business, even though it is FDA approved. They actually have legal protection now from the bogus lawsuits made against the company. In the UK there are only 2 people that have these. I've seen both of them, and they both produced identical scans of my jaw. The first guy had no clue how to fix the nightmare unleashed on me. And the second which is giving me surgery on monday .. will hopefully fix me.
Heres my ultra sound scan
Image
it basically shows blood flow. So 48 where i had my wisdom tooth out has no blood flow at all. Also the bone marrow under the adjacent tooth has entirely died, so that needs to come out sadly an the bone all cut away so it can heal. The guy that i went to see also used an infra-red laser thing to measure temperature of where I had my wisdom teeth extracted, and it was 0.4 deg C cooler than the rest of my mouth, simply because there was no blood flow there. I was gonna post this later but I've not had the surgery yet. Gonna have it either videoed, or photos taken of the operation so I can write about it. The whole experience has left me extremely bitter about 'healthcare' having been so spectacularly failed by the system.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 13:38:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', 'd')entistry is something i have spent some time looking into, although i've not really looked into the ADA etc.


ADA formed basically as a marketing organization for amalgam. Even back in the 1800's when amalgam was invented, it was known that mercury ingestion was a very very bad thing and there was a lot of resistance from the medical field to putting it in people's mouth. ADA formed to promote the idea that it was fine. Consequently most state dental boards today consider it malpractice and grounds for revoking a dental license to tell someone that amalgam is dangerous or to remove a filling just because it's made of amalgam. There are a growing number of mercury free dentists, but they all to a greater or lesser extent live with the constant risk of having their license revoked.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby dukey » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 15:56:25

material science has come a long long way since the 1800's. There is no argument for amalgam any more. It doesn't even bond to teeth so they must have huge undercuts in the tooth so it stays in. In the UK, the government will only subsidise amalgam fillings, so the poor people all end up with chronic mercury poisoning. I guess that's one way to get rid of them :o

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n 1991, the World Health Organization confirmed that mercury contained in dental amalgam is the greatest source of mercury vapour in non-industrialized settings, exposing the concerned population to mercury levels significantly exceeding those set for food and for air

http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_hea ... 230506.pdf

Why isn't your average dentist aware of the above quote ? I guess the joke is on them though, because a study in Norway showed that dental nurses had 40% less fertility than the rest of the population, probably through their exposure to mercury.

Image

I am somewhat surprised at you smallpox, I thought you would be a big supporter of amalgam simply because the establishment says it is safe.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 16:11:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', 'I') am somewhat surprised at you smallpox, I thought you would be a big supporter of amalgam simply because the establishment says it is safe.


I never "supported" amalgam, but I thought the mercury filling people were a bit fruity until I read the WHO report. Pretty hard to make sense of the idea that it's safe for me to ingest it from my teeth, but at the same time it's deadly poison if I get it from eating fish.

The thing that you don't get about me Dukey is that I'm am NOT a supporter of the status quo. I AM a huge advocate of reasoned metered discussion. All the status quo people in my life all think I'm a wingnut. I'm constantly ranting about how awful this or that thing is. I don't disagree with your basic premise that the status quo is bad, I just think your argumentation about why it's bad is often inadequate. Real life problems don't distill well down into five word slogans and simplistic moral dualism.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby dukey » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 16:25:27

true

The problem I have is something called cavitations.. from poor extraction. Trying to make a well reasoned argument about them is hard simply because there is virtually no literature on the subject and 99.9% of dentists have never even heard of them. There's only a few people in the world which will address the issue, and these people are labelled as quacks and frauds. This is why i want to get photos taken about what I am about to undergo on Monday. According to the literature I have read, cavitations occur 88% of the time from wisdom teeth extractions, but since they are invisible on x-ray dentists don't know (or care) that they could be there. A cavitation is literally a toxic hole in the jawbone where anaerobic bacteria, free from the annoyance of your immune system are allowed to multiply unhindered. Obviously the health effects can potentially be profound.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 16:37:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', 'T')here's only a few people in the world which will address the issue, and these people are labelled as quacks and frauds.


How did you find out that you had the problem?
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby Ayoob » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 16:49:37

There's two kinds of people in this world. People who are into five word slogans and simplistic moral dualism, and people who aren't.

QED
User avatar
Ayoob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 16:54:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', '
')
since they are invisible on x-ray dentists don't know (or care) that they could be there.



Good dentists do care. My dad practiced and taught dentistry for many years (and now in retirement he volunteers at a charity clinic - at age 78) and I remember him speaking often about the dangers of "dry socket" (cavitations).

Unfortunately, good dentists are probably few. :(
Ludi
 
Top

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby dukey » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 16:57:57

well before i had my wisdom teeth extracted I had already read this paper in the journal of medicine by hal huggins

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')outine Dental Extractions
Routinely Produce Cavitations

http://www.nvbt.nl/hot-cvs.html

The problem with the way dentists extract teeth is, they don't ever remove the peridontal ligaments. The bone doesn't know to start healing because the membrane is still there. What normally happens is, the top will simply heal over, leaving an actual hole in the bone. Often they are filled with fluid. So anyway, i printed off the paper in the link above and made the dentist that took my wisdom tooth out read it. He pretty much shat his pants. He wouldn't shut up about it. Anyway I figured I developed cavitations anyway even with the dentist removing my peridontal ligaments because 6 months after I had them out my health really went down hill again, and I had a lot of pain in lymph nodes in my neck. I went back to him and told him I suspected I developed cavitations anyway, he x-rayed me, said everything looked fine and sent me on my way. You see there is a skill in taking teeth out, not only do you have to remove the peridontal ligaments, and a small amount of bone, but you have to do it with a very slow and irrigated drill, otherwise the bone is simply cooked and won't heal. My problem was slightly worse than just cavitations though, where I had the infection in my bone originally it has killed the bone marrow under the adjacent tooth, which I would never would have found out, without the Cavitat scanner.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 18:09:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', 'w')ell before i had my wisdom teeth extracted I had already read this paper in the journal of medicine by hal huggins


That's the Journal of Advancement in Medicine. I never heard of this journal before, so I started looking for information. They apparently folded in 1999 and there's nothing on the web to describe their mission, but article topics from the last three issues include the evils of vaccines, chronic systemic candidaisis, aromatherapy, chelation therapy, and the "biophysics" of homeopathy. Seems a fairly safe to say that 99% of the medical and dental fields would think that most if not all of the articles in this journal were of, shall we say, questionable credibility. Not to mention the article you are quoting is about dentistry, but the lead author is a cardiologist. Seems kinda weird doesn't it? So I'm just wondering why you decide: A: I'm going to believe what this cardiologist has to say about wisdom tooth extraction when almost everyone else says he's crazy. and B: doesn't it seem a bit odd that there's this thing that almost nobody believes in, but you believe in it and then you get it? I don't mean to sound argumentative. You obviously have to make the choices you feel are right for your health. Can you see, though, that from my perspective, it seems like a lot of the draw is that nobody believes in it?
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby dukey » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 20:26:14

well the guy doing the study, Hal Huggins is quite a famous dentist ..
I've read some of his books before.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou obviously have to make the choices you feel are right for your health. Can you see, though, that from my perspective, it seems like a lot of the draw is that nobody believes in it?


Well how many dentists believe amalgams leak dangerous amounts of mercury ? Most don't. If they did they wouldn't place it. What people believe is irrelevant, only the facts matter. The facts say that the problems of cavitations exist, is it my fault mainstream dentistry refuses to admit they exist ? It's as if these organisations are stuck in some time warp. I mean amalgam alone is a ridiculous material to use, regardless of the toxicity because a) its grey when your teeth are white, and b) it doesn't bond to the surface of the tooth, so deep undercuts are required to make it stay there. Material science has come such a long long way since the 1800's theres no reason to use it at all any more. The arguments that composites dont last as long, even if true would be financially rewarding for them, lol. Plus, as far as my health goes, there is nothing else I can try. Being diagnosed with CFS is a death sentence almost, because it says they haven't a clue what's wrong with you. The Cavitat scans .. found real problems that are fixable. So in my book it's worth a shot.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 11 Jul 2009, 21:29:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', 'W')ell how many dentists believe amalgams leak dangerous amounts of mercury ?


I don't know about dentists specifically, but the WHO agrees there's reason for concern. That's a pretty mainstream friend to have.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat people believe is irrelevant, only the facts matter.


That sort of attitude, IMHO, just isn't consistent with the reality of medical science. The "facts" in medicine are virtually always ambiguous and lend themselves very easily to misinterpretation. There is ALWAYS a severe risk that the biases of the observer color the interpretation. That's true of people wedded to the mainstream, but it's equally true of people wedded to battling the mainstream. If someone is getting their lab funded by Novartis, you can bet they're going to try every way possible to publish a study saying Novartis's drug works. That's partly because they like having a lab and doing research. It's also partly because they get excited about the drug. They develop a gut feeling that the drug works and will help people, so they want to publish research to that effect. That's equally true if they're studying Cavitat scanners. Maintaining any sort of objectivity WRT medical science requires constantly questioning what your own biases are and how they may be coloring your interpretations. That is THE reason why I always end up arguing with so called skeptics. They are skeptical of everyone else, but they have an impenetrable arrogance about their own ideas. Clinging to any idea about medicine that tightly will lead you off into the weeds. What other people believe, doesn't always matter, but it's a warning sign. If you believe what no one else does WRT medicine, you are either a pioneer or a moron. It's not always easy to tell which ahead of time, but the later definitely outnumber the former.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Cavitat scans found real problems that are fixable. So in my book it's worth a shot.

I hope it works for you.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby Kristen » Sun 12 Jul 2009, 03:21:47

I woukdn't be surprised if it where true. We have ads here selling a disease to sell a pill. (perhaps making up) No one can argue that there ads work well. It no coincidence that 20 percent of college students are taking antideppressants. After a month of taking SSRI's your body becomes dependant (addicted) to it. After three missed doses you start to experience withdrawal hence the medical term "SSRI discontinuation syndrome." Although the first two Prozac and Zoloft, have a longer half life so the withdrawal is less severe.
User avatar
Kristen
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: The Medical Monopoly

Unread postby manu » Sun 12 Jul 2009, 04:35:52

The pharmacutical industry is part of the plan of the global elite who control it. The Hapsburgs and the
Rothschilds created this monopoly long ago. Their goal is to make sure no one can grow any medicial plants without their permission. Although it was a big blow to their industry when "Jacko" O.D. on their products. Pharmacutical drugs kill more people than anything else. They only have 80% more of the college kids to go and they can start chippen them. After all, they would not want them walking around like zombies when they stop taking their meds. If they are chipped then they can be located much easier.
User avatar
manu
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00


Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron