by ForlornHope » Wed 01 Jul 2009, 17:51:24
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('anador', '.')... those cities everywhere else in the world that have been continuously inhabited for millenia ... an obvious fluke then.....
No, not at all. There are very few that have been inhabited for millenia, by the same people. They grow, decay, lay in ruin till another people(or a later rendition of the original inhabitants) rebuild anew.(They do this because usually the previous city was located there for some beneficial reason, strategic, trade, closeness to water etc, hence rebuilt later on the exact same spot). But that hardly counts as a continous city.
Millenia(thousands of years) for a city to survive intact is a rarity. Hundreds of years, definately. In Asia there are more than a handful. In Europe some. In Africa only in Egypt, and these not continuosly. In North America, and the U.S.A. in particular, I believe the oldest Continuosly occupied city since inception is St. Augustine, Florida. And that, for only about 400 yrs give or take.
But back to the OP, its a waste to spend the effort, time, and money to do something that will naturally occur in every city...turn to ruins.
It's only in our energy intensive arrogance that we think we can overcome entrophy and natural cycles with regards to our cities.
Just some ponderings, no arguements intended.
Cheers
Forlorn Hope
Be kind to friend and kin, and reward not their trespasses against you; bear and forbear, and win for yourself thereby long enduring praise of men.
It is their lot who stand with the great that they enjoy high honors, and are more respected than others, but stand often in danger of their lives.