Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Book: "A Nation of Farmers" By Sharon Astyk & Aaron Newton

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

Book: "A Nation of Farmers" By Sharon Astyk & Aaron Newton

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Sun 31 May 2009, 04:02:08

Disclosure: I knew was likely to like this book before I ever opened it for two reasons: A) Sharon is the first person I ever emailed on the issue of peak oil and preparation on a yahoo group years ago and B) As many of you know, I find the food issue the most interesting and pressing.
----------------
That being said, it is great. A good articulation of the basis and problems our food system faces and how this ties into resource depletion. There is also a positive vision put forward for what the culture could be come while a realistic undertone that take into account the difference between what could be done and what is likely.

Humerous and helpful, a good mix of facts, personal narritive and reference to other works on the issue of food, farming, cooking and eating. Well worth checking out from your local library, purchasing or giving as a gift to a friend. I felt encouraged and re-energized having read it.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Official Description', 'O')nce we could fill our grocery carts with cheap and plentiful food, but not anymore. Cheap food has gone the way of cheap oil. Climate change is already reducing crop yields worldwide. The cost of flying in food from far away and shipping it across the country in refrigerated trucks is rapidly becoming unviable. Cars and cows increasingly devour grain harvests, sending prices skyrocketing. More Americans than ever before require food stamps and food pantries just to get by, and a worldwide food crisis is unfolding, overseas and in our kitchens.

We can keep hunger from stalking our families, but doing so will require a fundamental shift in our approach to field and table. A Nation of Farmers examines the limits and dangers of the globalized food system and shows how returning to the basics is our best hope. The book includes in-depth guidelines for:

Creating resilient local food systems Growing, cooking, and eating sustainably and naturally Becoming part of the solution to the food crisis The book argues that we need to make self-provisioning, once the most ordinary of human activities, central to our lives. The results will be better food, better health, better security, and freedom from corporations that don’t have our interests at heart. This is critical reading for anyone who eats and cares about high-quality food.

http://www.newsociety.com/bookid/4034
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby TheDude » Sun 31 May 2009, 12:29:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n June of 2008, 2500 people stood in line, desperately waiting for free food vouchers in Wisconsin. Their need was so urgent and their frustration so violent that fights broke out and at least one person was trampled, stepped on as other Americans tried to get food. Just the week before an e-coli scare caused the recall of millions of tomatoes. Almost 2 million more Americans will depend on food stamps this year than last - as many as 1 in 7 in some states.


Right there I'm at a loss for correlation. It was the opening stages of a recession, an uptick in demand for food stamps is to expected. Not that I'm anti-relocation but some perspective is called for, and the vision of tens of millions of Americans putting backs to ploughs I find more than a bit dubious, out of simple practicality for a start - it's a vocation for those born to the manor, not out-of-work sysops etc. - and also because of the various objections Stuart Staniford raised in his article The Fallacy of Reversibility, which Sharon herself responded to. You should hear all sides of the argument if you're sincerely interested in outcomes; sending urbanites to the farms was tried in Depression-era France, btw, and was pretty much a bust.

Have an order for it at the library, thanks for the heads-up Cur.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 02:56:02

Sorry I missed your reply dude,

From your link,

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m making an argument that society is unlikely to reverse its trajectory of development, regardless of what we might like. Calls for it to do so are a distraction and get in the way of figuring out what we really need to be doing, and what the real options and dangers are.


I think what seperates stuart from those he describes as "reversalists" is that the reversalists see peak oil leading to the break down of the complex systems, including agricultre. So while reversalists (and I guess I am one) understand that reversing the industrialization of agriculture is a Herculian task we would cali it "what we really need to be doing."

We are stuck between a rock and a hard place. The rock is what Stuart would call "what we must be doing" and the hard place is the reversalist option.

I am a liberal arts major living in the midwest... my only option is the reversalist... my community's only option is the reversalist. Even if I have to agree that sending people from the burbs to the countryside would be a epic failure unless those people want to come to the countryside and are seeking opportunity born of hard work.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby hillsidedigger » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 08:23:49

In a post-oil world, if America were to revert to be a nation of farmers, there would only be enough room for maybe 80 million people. That's an average of 40 acres of crop and pasture land for each family of 4 with a little excess possibly being produced which might allow some to practice the 'higher arts' in towns and small cities.
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby mos6507 » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 09:32:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', 'I')n a post-oil world, if America were to revert to be a nation of farmers, there would only be enough room for maybe 80 million people. That's an average of 40 acres of crop and pasture land for each family of 4 with a little excess possibly being produced which might allow some to practice the 'higher arts' in towns and small cities.


A nation of farmers eating a traditional carnivorous western diet. Diet is going to be an early casualty of peak oil unless we would rather go straight to zompocalypse.
mos6507
 

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby hillsidedigger » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 09:49:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', 'I')n a post-oil world, if America were to revert to be a nation of farmers, there would only be enough room for maybe 80 million people. That's an average of 40 acres of crop and pasture land for each family of 4 with a little excess possibly being produced which might allow some to practice the 'higher arts' in towns and small cities.


A nation of farmers eating a traditional carnivorous western diet. Diet is going to be an early casualty of peak oil unless we would rather go straight to zompocalypse.


Actually, I am thinking 40 acres for a family of 4 would be needed (in a Post-Oil setting) to provide a low-meat (not much of it wild game), mostly fruit, vegetable, nut and grain diet with some dairy food.

Why 10 acres per person? Well, by the time you find 800 million acres of farmland in the United States, a lot of it is kind of dry and marginal. As well, as pointed out in yesterday's "corn" thread, a sustainable agriculture routine reguires taking biomass from a large area to temporarily buildup a small area for farming. Also, only a small portion of each person's 10 acres would be in active production in a given year with the rest replenishing while lying fallow or growing up into trees or tall grass for awhile.
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby rangerone314 » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 10:42:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', 'I')n a post-oil world, if America were to revert to be a nation of farmers, there would only be enough room for maybe 80 million people. That's an average of 40 acres of crop and pasture land for each family of 4 with a little excess possibly being produced which might allow some to practice the 'higher arts' in towns and small cities.


A nation of farmers eating a traditional carnivorous western diet. Diet is going to be an early casualty of peak oil unless we would rather go straight to zompocalypse.


Actually, I am thinking 40 acres for a family of 4 would be needed (in a Post-Oil setting) to provide a low-meat (not much of it wild game), mostly fruit, vegetable, nut and grain diet with some dairy food.

Why 10 acres per person? Well, by the time you find 800 million acres of farmland in the United States, a lot of it is kind of dry and marginal. As well, as pointed out in yesterday's "corn" thread, a sustainable agriculture routine reguires taking biomass from a large area to temporarily buildup a small area for farming. Also, only a small portion of each person's 10 acres would be in active production in a given year with the rest replenishing while lying fallow or growing up into trees or tall grass for awhile.

I think that using compost derived from waste (high in nitrogen & other stuff) can be used as fertilizer and create a closed system. A well-engineered system with minimal runoff should draw that figure down a lot... We need to create more closed-loops.

Even in the 1900s, corn yield per acre was like 20 bushels or such... a diversified farming (mostly vegetarian) using techinques back then should be able to support 2 people per acre. I would think with the greater understanding of soil, environment and nutrients & how everything hooks together, one could great improve upon that, better approaches & techinques ala "One Straw Revolution".

The technique I am experimenting with corn this year is a variation on the Three Sisters Method, growing 6 corn in a circle on a mound. 6 Climbing beans & peas use the corn as a pole, and squash is planted further out on mound, and spreads out between mounds to keep weeds down. Clustered on the small mounds is purslane, to prevent erosion (and also provide a non-fish source of Omega-3 fatty acids). Some erosion due to rain, etc will occur anyway but the worst of the work will be done as each mound is created and the clay soil remediated.

I am going to experiment with rotations involving potatoes and bush beans (which I have growing in another area) growing on mounds also, which I may just swap for corn/beans/squash.

The vegetable gardens are moderately elevated beds, and so far weeding has not been a huge issue. One 64-square foot bed is has about 20 asparagus, 2 tomato plants, 10 basil plants, and hundreds of carrots, beets, and radishes. So far, of the 10 areas reserved for beds, I've found the time to soil-improve & cultivate 4 (2 of 3 asparagus/tomato beds, 1 herb bed, 1 of 3 potato/bushbean/horseradish beds, and 0 of 3 --soon to change -- cabbage/broccoli/rhubarb/hyssop beds)...
They are like a keyhole shape vaguely; this shows the rough arrangement I'm constructing:

=============road=====================
DRIVE^^^^^^^grass^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WAY-^^^^^^^^^^^multiflora rose hedge^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
DRIVE^^^^^^^^^^^^^^evergreen tree privacy^^^^^^^^^^^^
WAY-^^^^^^^^^^^Rosa rugosa hedge^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
DRIVE---F-F---AAAPP
WAY----K--GH-oCooP
DRIVE--K--GH-oCCoH
WAY----K--GH
DRIVE--K--GH
WAY

F=fig tree, A=asparagus/tomato/etc P=potato/etc C=cabbage family H=herb K=kiwi fruit vines GH=greenhouse o=spaces inbetween garden beds which may eventually be filled...
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby hillsidedigger » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 10:55:56

"Even in the 1900s, corn yield per acre was like 20 bushels or such... a diversified farming (mostly vegetarian) using techinques back then should be able to support 2 people per acre."

Even on 'moderately good land' I think 2 people per acre is too optimistic.

Most of the 800 million acres of potential American farmland is less than 'moderately good land'. There's less than 500 million acres currently in cropland some of it requiring engineered drainage or irrigation. The other 300 million acres is pasture ranging from well watered by rainfall to very arid most of which would better not be converted to cropland.

Another note: Of the 500 million acres of cropland much of it (maybe 40%) can only be farmed by 'dry-land' methods and is only good for wheat or a few other crops and really is not suitable for gardening.
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby mos6507 » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 11:14:16

Then I suggest the definition of "farmland" be broadened.

Image

The age of conestoga wagons heading out west is long gone. We're going to have to throw out the book on traditional concepts and just do whatever works.
mos6507
 

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby AgentR » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 12:02:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'T')he age of conestoga wagons heading out west is long gone. We're going to have to throw out the book on traditional concepts and just do whatever works.


Whatever works is likely to be quite traditional, just maybe outside our recent cultural norms. Tell a Chinese or Thai peasant that a family of four needs forty acres of land in order to survive, he'd think you were either an idiot or a con artist trying to steal his land.

If you look at a growing space in terms of the amount of calories needed to be grown; and then select your crops to produce CALORIES and forget this broccoli, lettuce, and tomato fetish we seem to have; you'll note something interesting. First, backyard gardens, or shared urban garden space are useless; and second, very large fields are complete overcompensation and useful only in the sense of a commercial venture. That 2-4 acre piece of land that seems both too large, or too small; is EXACTLY the right size. Our perception that it is the wrong size isn't the result of spreadsheets, calculators, and known science; it is from cultural expectation. A backyard tomato garden is OK culturally; a large farm with hundreds (or even thousands) of acres in commercial production is OK culturally. Growing enough corn, rice, beans, and peas to get a couple hundred bushels/yr of high calorie produce... thats what those bad ole redneck hicks do! Can't have that!
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby rangerone314 » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 12:10:19

I seriously need to post a pic of all the water sources on 2 1/2 acres...
#1) small spring in woods - which creates tiny stream which ends near where woods meets west side lawn (and saturates said lawn)
#2) small spring on north side... that runs into #3
#3) small stream runs in sunny area (south to north)
#4 & #5) in woods, small stream & larger stream run west to east and merge with #3

My four main areas for growing things can be expanded to fairly easily to this (areas based on not being in shade):

#1) North Crop Area = trapezoid 80h*50t*75b=5,000 sqFt (corn, beans, squash, amaranth, quinoa, okra)

#2) West Crop Area = 45w*120L=5,400 sqFt (corn, beans, squash, amaranth, quinoa, millet--for chickens)

#3) East Crop Area = 70*70=4,900 sqFt (mainly vegetables, herbs, potatoes)

#4) Middle Area (16 blueberries, plus cranberries, aronia, strawberries, lettuce, spinach, fruit trees) = 90*25 = 2,250 sqFt

I may very likely rotate potatoes and wheat & such into areas #1 & #2 (seeing as how they are comprised of mounds)

The areas COULD be expanded a tiny bit more if I pushed.

All areas are polyculture, ie the Yukon gold potato plants are separated by fava bean plants and the corners have horseradishes. Tomato plants and asparagus are near other with lots of basil, beets, radishes and carrots inbetween as pretty much a ground cover. When the cabbage beds are ready (hopefully soon because planters are crowded!), they'll have brussel sprounts, broccoli, cabbage, rhubarb, hyssop & soybeans

In addition, there are some areas along the margins, such as the 4 female and 1 male kiwi vine (females of which will produce huge amounts of fruit at maturity), 2 fig trees, multiple American hazelnut bushes, American persimmons, mulberries, and black walnuts, which can produce substantial amounts of food.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 12:11:45

Horticulture (perennial crops) is more productive per acre than agriculture.
Ludi
 

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby hillsidedigger » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 13:00:30

"Tell a Chinese or Thai peasant that a family of four needs forty acres"

If the land is well watered, well drained, naturaly quite fertile, if only considering subsistence farming for next season (not for generations), if there's no need for a woodland for heating fuel, no need for pasturage of any kind, then sure less than 1/10th. of 40 acres would be fine.

Note: Many farmable areas would be completely depleted within a few seasons of 2 people per acre production without intensive inputs from off the site. Some farmable areas like bottomlands and glacially produced soils may endure for centuries at 2 people being fed per acre.

Some places, 4 acres or even less is enough for a familily of 4. Some places, 400 acres or more of moderately good range land is not enough to support a family of 4.

How are the great fields of the American Midwest to be broken up into small farms? Much land will be lost due to roads and driveways even if what is being driven is only a mule pulled wagon. Much land will be lost for the residential footprints if each section is to have 320 families of 4 which is 2 per acre?
Last edited by hillsidedigger on Tue 23 Jun 2009, 13:22:09, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby rangerone314 » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 13:15:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'T')he age of conestoga wagons heading out west is long gone. We're going to have to throw out the book on traditional concepts and just do whatever works.


Whatever works is likely to be quite traditional, just maybe outside our recent cultural norms. Tell a Chinese or Thai peasant that a family of four needs forty acres of land in order to survive, he'd think you were either an idiot or a con artist trying to steal his land.

If you look at a growing space in terms of the amount of calories needed to be grown; and then select your crops to produce CALORIES and forget this broccoli, lettuce, and tomato fetish we seem to have; you'll note something interesting. First, backyard gardens, or shared urban garden space are useless; and second, very large fields are complete overcompensation and useful only in the sense of a commercial venture. That 2-4 acre piece of land that seems both too large, or too small; is EXACTLY the right size. Our perception that it is the wrong size isn't the result of spreadsheets, calculators, and known science; it is from cultural expectation. A backyard tomato garden is OK culturally; a large farm with hundreds (or even thousands) of acres in commercial production is OK culturally. Growing enough corn, rice, beans, and peas to get a couple hundred bushels/yr of high calorie produce... thats what those bad ole redneck hicks do! Can't have that!

+1

I do have SOME fruit, nuts, broccoli, letttuce & tomato but for nutrition & balance... the bulk of square footage is dedicated to corn, beans, potatoes, quinoa, amaranth (and possibly wheat) -- can't grow rice though in Maryland, not long enough of growing season...

About an acre is wooded, so I have firewood source...
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby mos6507 » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 13:27:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', '
')That 2-4 acre piece of land that seems both too large, or too small; is EXACTLY the right size.


Maybe so, but is there a 2-4 acre parcel available for every family on the planet? I think not. Those "useless" backyards and urban spaces are going to have to be used. We have no alternative.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby mos6507 » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 13:30:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'c')an't grow rice though in Maryland, not long enough of growing season.


Give it a few years and you'll be growing coffee there.

Image
mos6507
 
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby rangerone314 » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 13:33:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'c')an't grow rice though in Maryland, not long enough of growing season.


Give it a few years and you'll be growing coffee there.

Image


I have considered that possibility (well not coffee)...

I think GW may push Maryland from zone 7 into zone 8. (which means I could grow tea, peanuts and cotton and overwinter jiaogulan outside)
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby 3aidlillahi » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 13:39:27

Thanks for the review, Wis. Is it mostly an investigative and reporting book about the farming industry or does it lay out how to accomplish a nation of farmers (by showing how we can be one)?

At only $13 or so on Amazon, I'm adding it to my shopping cart for when I have the funds available.
Riches are not from abundance of worldly goods, but from a contented mind.
User avatar
3aidlillahi
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 13:57:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', '
')Note: Many farmable areas would be completely depleted within a few seasons of 2 people per acre production without intensive inputs from off the site.



Essentially permanent fertility can be maintained through mulching with materials grown onsite. See "Biointensive,""Permaculture," and "Natural Farming."
Ludi
 
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Unread postby davep » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 14:03:24

I think the 40-acre quote is a bit ridiculous. We live in a relatively humid environment with 10 acres. This land has been used for hay for at least 30 years, with no ferrtilising.

Given my experience with an eight hundred foot garden this year and planting of fruit and nut trees, I think we could easily use a portion of our 10 acres for firewood, another for livestock, some more for forest gardening and maybe one acre for annual crops. This would enable us to sell a fair amount too. The limiting factor (in our situation) is not the land, but our experience. I'm sure that after a few years we will be producing a prodigious amount of open-pollinated food.

The lesson is that you have to start practicing intensive sustainable techniques now, before it becomes a necessity, especially for the perennials.
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Next

Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests