Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby Ludi » Thu 28 May 2009, 09:48:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '
')I think that about covers USGS peak oil dates. :-D



So are you saying USGS information doesn't indicate Peak Oil will be "later"?

Or what, exactly?

Sorry about not really understanding what your response to Aaron was meant to convey. :oops:
Ludi
 

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby Sixstrings » Thu 28 May 2009, 10:28:55

Another factor here is coal.. don't we have like 250 years supply of coal in the US? And then there's nuclear. If France can supply all it's electricity via nuclear, then we can too (if we had too).

So it seems to me that when major declines in light sweet become obvious, there will still be twice as much heavy crude in the ground, buying us at least another ten years which is time enough for us to enact major conservation measures and transition auto manufacturing over to electric.

We waste a lot oil right now, so you can't in fairness discount the fuel savings real conservation would bring. It would mean lifestyle changes for sure, like the end of the hour+ commute from suburbia. But how does that necessarily mean The End Of The World? Americans made it through WWII with very strict rationing, and yet society never fell apart. And a lot of jobs people don't really need to be commuting to in the first place, they can be done with telecommuting.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby TheAntiDoomer » Thu 28 May 2009, 10:32:39

All true 6sting, and check out OF2 Natty Gas thread, we are literally swimming in that stuff:

http://peakoil.com/peak-oil-discussion/us-natural-gas-discoveries-t52943.html

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'A')nother factor here is coal.. don't we have like 250 years supply of coal in the US? And then there's nuclear. If France can supply all it's electricity via nuclear, then we can too (if we had too).

So it seems to me that when major declines in light sweet become obvious, there will still be twice as much heavy crude still in the ground, buying plenty of time for us to enact major conservation measures and transition auto manufacturing over to electric.

We waste a lot oil right now, so you can't in fairness discount the fuel savings real conservation would bring. It would mean lifestyle changes for sure, like the end of the hour+ commute from suburbia. But how does that necessarily mean The End Of The World? Americans made it through WWII with very strict rationing, and yet society never fell apart.
"The human ability to innovate out of a jam is profound.That’s why Darwin will always be right, and Malthus will always be wrong.” -K.R. Sridhar


Do I make you Corny? :)

"expect 8$ gas on 08/08/08" - Prognosticator
User avatar
TheAntiDoomer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby Aaron » Thu 28 May 2009, 10:48:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '
')I think that about covers USGS peak oil dates. :-D



So are you saying USGS information doesn't indicate Peak Oil will be "later"?

Or what, exactly?

Sorry about not really understanding what your response to Aaron was meant to convey. :oops:


:)
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby AgentR » Thu 28 May 2009, 11:12:15

You may be confusing Peak Oil with all the various stories of fast collapse and such. Peak Oil is undeniably true; its simply math; finite amount of X; some curve describing consumption rate of X; thus there exist a maximal point of consumption. Basic calculus. Nothing fancy at all.

Now... Whether that maximal point is in 2006 or 2286 remains to be proven; but the existence of that point is not in question.

What does this mean then? It causes people to confuse beliefs and prognostications with the underlying truth. Peak Oil to some, not only means a limited resource, but a resource availability failure COMING SOON, that will cause some kind of economic and political cascade failure of the system resulting in vast swaths of uninhabited suburban homes and imminent die-off.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby Armageddon » Thu 28 May 2009, 12:25:08

Peak oil is the reason why are witnessing the collapse of modern society. Don't believe me ? Just wait until Winter or 2010 at the latest. Buckle up buddy boy, this is going to be a wild ride.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby ian807 » Thu 28 May 2009, 14:32:18

In our lifetimes, peak oil is more about economics than energy.

In a nutshell, we're not running out of oil, per se. We're running out of cheap oil that's energy net positive (i.e. you get more energy out of it than you put in to get it).

There's a lot of oil in the Bakken oil fields for example. Unfortunately, it's in that aren't very permeable, so you basically have to dig the rocks up, grind them to a powder, and heat that to get the oil out. It's easy to use much more energy to do that than you get out of the oil, at a cost far higher than what you could sell the oil for.

So, as huge as that field might be, it's useless.

So oil gets more expensive as time goes by, pushing the economy down, and down, making more and more things like international shipping and fertilizer production too expensive to do in many parts of the world. The world is no longer flat, or small.

Just in time becomes, "maybe in a month or two." Fertilizer becomes something you hope you can make locally, or get eventualy, if you can afford it. Medicine, tools become rare and expensive.

Food production suffers. Manufacturing suffers. We all get poorer. Industries start failing. When the farmer can't get the money to plant, the trucking company goes out of business and the rails don't go where they used to, we're looking at food distribution problems that mean higher prices at least. No food at worst.

All of this would be less of a problem if we had the population we did at the turn of the twentieth century. There are too many of us now. In the next couple of decades, I expect, some large portion of us are going to starve, not be able get their medicines, and so on. Expect a die off.

If we were smarter, and started now, damming every river for electricity, re-instituting a rail system, switched more things to coal and natural gas and made a big push to develop solar. wind and wave power, we might transition painlessly.

We won't, of course. Politicians only care about staying in power. The wealthy only care about preserving shier money. Any significant change will have to be done bottom up.
User avatar
ian807
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 03 Nov 2008, 04:00:00

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby Plantagenet » Thu 28 May 2009, 14:45:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ian807', '
')If we were smarter, and started now, damming every river for electricity, re-instituting a rail system, switched more things to coal and natural gas and made a big push to develop solar. wind and wave power, we might transition painlessly.

We won't, of course.


1. We are smart enough---its the dopes and crooks in DC who won't act.
2. There aren't any more major rivers to dam.
3. Obama lied---he isn't putting significant money into the rail system
4. Coal emits too much CO2---not a good option
5. Natural gas would be OK, but this administration opposes most drilling
6. Solar, wind and wave power cannot contribute enough electricity to replace oil and run electric rail, electric cars, etc.
7. We will NEVER transition painlessly. It will be a very difficult and expensive process. 8)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby OutOfGas » Thu 28 May 2009, 20:01:12

If peak oil is not true why are Mexico and many other countries production (including US) declining rapidly ?

The only new large finds (relativly speaking) are very expensive to develop.

Saudi Arabia ( population exploding) is barely able to meet domestic budget with current export rates.

Even with the US recession, people still move like army ants in their autos.

I believe within a year or two, when Peak Oil becomes accepted $147 B oil will seen cheap.

TSWHTF when gas shortages become common in the US despite the price.
OutOfGas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat 21 Mar 2009, 19:31:45

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby vision-master » Thu 28 May 2009, 20:06:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Armageddon', 'P')eak oil is the reason why are witnessing the collapse of modern society. Don't believe me ? Just wait until Winter or 2010 at the latest. Buckle up buddy boy, this is going to be a wild ride.


Wild ride I agree, but I think were currently on a long, long down-slope. Gradual at first. We have been on it a while now. Wouldn't like to say how long, probably 3-5 years. The slide gets ever more and more noticeable. There will be odd, short levelling off periods (such as now), we may go up a little also occasionally if big finds made (i.e. offshore Falklands, Australa etc). Renewable energy will help, but we soon resume the downward path

15 - 20 years before things get BLOODY serious, though ever increasing "energy pain" will be felt by all WELL before then. Thats if we (the world's governments) are so THICK, SELF CENTERED, SELFISH etc not to notice and (try) to take action. Probably too little, too late if / when they do.

No, 2010 will be harder than 2009. 2015 much harder still, etc. Sorry, doomers, doom will most likely come, but not for quite a while. Very slowly, over quite a number of years, bits at a time, ever compounding the problem, before the amount of sh1t overwhelms the fan. THATS when the wild ride will begin.

Gasmon


I think we will sink like a stone. 8O
vision-master
 
Top

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby MonteQuest » Thu 28 May 2009, 21:11:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', ' ')You're right, what I'm really questioning here is the "Doom" factor of peak oil. I feel confident from what I've learned up to now that a peak on heavy crude is not a concern within my lifetime.



Then you are reading trash. The EROEI, cost and flow rate of heavy crude comes nowhere near light sweet crude in price or production rate.

Light sweet crude was the low hanging fruit. You now need a ladder.

Connect the dots.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby jasonraymondson » Thu 28 May 2009, 22:09:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', ' ')You're right, what I'm really questioning here is the "Doom" factor of peak oil. I feel confident from what I've learned up to now that a peak on heavy crude is not a concern within my lifetime.



Then you are reading trash. The EROEI, cost and flow rate of heavy crude comes nowhere near light sweet crude in price or production rate.

Light sweet crude was the low hanging fruit. You now need a ladder.

Connect the dots.



The dots as you refer to it are irrelevant. Peak oil research is all but a waste of time. The oil age is coming to a close, now we work towards a new age of living in dumsters and killing our fellow homeless for supper.
jasonraymondson
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2727
Joined: Wed 04 Jul 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Peace Out
Top

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby shortonsense » Thu 28 May 2009, 22:39:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '
')I think that about covers USGS peak oil dates. :-D



So are you saying USGS information doesn't indicate Peak Oil will be "later"?

Or what, exactly?

Sorry about not really understanding what your response to Aaron was meant to convey. :oops:


Aaron and I already went round and round over this.

The USGS used some specific language in their reports related to what they were quantifying.

ASPO ignored that language either because they didn't understand it, didn't read it, or actually wanted to misrepresent it, and then ASPO created a graph showing multiple scenario's based on that misunderstanding/ignorance/willful misrepresentation.

I can provide a link to the thread rather than rehashing it here if you'd like.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby shortonsense » Thu 28 May 2009, 22:40:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '
')I think that about covers USGS peak oil dates. :-D



So are you saying USGS information doesn't indicate Peak Oil will be "later"?

Or what, exactly?

Sorry about not really understanding what your response to Aaron was meant to convey. :oops:


:)


[smilie=icon_thumleft.gif]
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: An admission -- I'm not sure if Peak Oil is true

Postby shortonsense » Thu 28 May 2009, 22:43:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OutOfGas', 'I')f peak oil is not true why are Mexico and many other countries production (including US) declining rapidly ?


Everybody here seems to think that peak oil is true...at least in its technical definition.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OutOfGas', ' ')

TSWHTF when gas shortages become common in the US despite the price.


Thats what people said would happen when peak oil happened. That was last year. This year is happy motoring. Maybe shortages will show up when we run out, which is the next phase of peak oil perhaps?
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron