by dunewalker » Thu 28 May 2009, 12:25:26
Nice image, AAA. As long as we're juggling carbon footprint and photography on this thread(thanks, Ibon), I wonder if there are any studies measuring the reduction in resource and energy use resulting from the world switching from print film photography to digital imaging. It would seem that the savings are huge. Just think, Kodak had to dig up some resources, make some film, box it up, ship it around the world, to be bought by us, exposed in our cameras, taken back to the developer, who digs up some more stuff to make our prints, then we have a photo. That entire resource-intensive process has been largely eliminated. (sorry for the 2 puns in that last sentence).
"Wilderness is another civilization apart from our own." - H.D. Thoreau