by Chuckmak » Tue 19 May 2009, 22:07:51
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chuckmak', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'W')hat does Obama have to do with William the Conqueror?
You're a conspiracy theorist, I'm sure you can make a connection somewhere.
Williams initials were "WTC" and I'm pretty sure he was a mulatto Hawaiian secret Muslim.
^^^ THIS IS WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT, PEOPLE!
by Jotapay » Wed 20 May 2009, 01:14:47
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chuckmak', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'W')hat does Obama have to do with William the Conqueror?
You're a conspiracy theorist, I'm sure you can make a connection somewhere.
1. You made an unprovoked personal attack dripping with condescension.
2. You didn't help your personal attack by supporting it with any evidence. Please explain your point.
3. Your "argument", if you want to call it that, is constructed like prepubescent insults on a 1st grade playground.
4. Such unfocused technique and unwarranted venom paints a decidedly poor picture of your character and mental acuity.
5. You choose to attack others unprovoked.
6. You also choose to refrain from logical discourse.
I'm very interested in your response, seeing the decidedly poor quality of your first one. I'm guessing the bar for your posts will be lowered even further into the levels of logic hell, but I'm willing to give you a chance to improve. Surprise me with something to accurately support your assertions!
by Chuckmak » Wed 20 May 2009, 16:33:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chuckmak', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'W')hat does Obama have to do with William the Conqueror?
You're a conspiracy theorist, I'm sure you can make a connection somewhere.
1. You made an unprovoked personal attack dripping with condescension.
2. You didn't help your personal attack by supporting it with any evidence. Please explain your point.
3. Your "argument", if you want to call it that, is constructed like prepubescent insults on a 1st grade playground.
4. Such unfocused technique and unwarranted venom paints a decidedly poor picture of your character and mental acuity.
5. You choose to attack others unprovoked.
6. You also choose to refrain from logical discourse.
I'm very interested in your response, seeing the decidedly poor quality of your first one. I'm guessing the bar for your posts will be lowered even further into the levels of logic hell, but I'm willing to give you a chance to improve. Surprise me with something to accurately support your assertions!
You sound a little upset there, buddy. One thing (as a "reformed" conspiracy theorist) is this. Y'all give TPTB
*TOO* much credit. However, when you look and look, they have created a system where they're to the point where they no longer can fully control it. It has grown so big and so complex and so out there that they're losing their grip on things. Will they try to push forward a NWO-type agenda? Sure they will, and they have.
HOWEVER, they system has too many wild cards that they have either not taken into account, popped up recently, or really can't control. Try as they might, and there's going to be a lot of pain involved, they will ultimately fail. It's just the way of the world. So sit back, grab some popcorn, and enjoy the ride. TPTB will drag the world through hell and back before the ship is righted and we're rid of them, but it's just a matter of course. What worries me is when TPTB finally realize they don't have control, that, my CT friend, is when SHTF, and they will be their own casualty (casualties? TPTB are more than one person, correct?) of something that is of their own creation. It is not on some Matrix "Ignorance is bliss" type sh*t I'm on, I just realize that in the end, TPTB's efforts will be futile, Their NWO-like creation is going to lead to their ultimate downfall. Remember that.
by Chuckmak » Thu 21 May 2009, 14:42:51
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chuckmak', 'Y')ou sound a little upset there, buddy.
If you are looking for a patsy, it ain't me. I stand up for myself.
I don't have a problem with and actually agree with most of the rest of your post.
But, initially I was just asking a question about the connection between Obama and William the Conqueror. That's it.
and you got defensive and hurt about it. you ask me to be more forthcoming and i did. now, if you agree with the rest of my post, why bother with conspiracy theories and the powers that be?
"if god doesn't exist, it is necessary that we invent him" - Voltaire
"they say prescott bush funded hitler" - Nas
