Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 20 May 2009, 09:59:36

You know the fool me once, fool me twice axiom.

The lesson of the credit crisis is that peak oil is more than just watching the production charts. There are too many factors contributing to oil prices.

1) Voluntary production cuts due to depressed demand
2) Speculators helped push oil to $147. They can and will do so again if they think they can make a buck. They can artifically push it up and then back down when they cash out en masse just like the stock market.
3) Potential dollar instability artifically inflating the price
4) Seasonal demand spikes (summer driving season) which are likely to subside in the fall.

So yes, oil depletion continues and we know where this is going to lead but pearkers who are so eager to get back on the peak oil doomer train should know better than to stick their necks out again with flawed predictions.
mos6507
 

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby TheDude » Wed 20 May 2009, 10:17:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')peculators helped push oil to $147.


The speculation myth | Sunov Petroleum Advisers

The cross plot for net long/short positions is a dandy.

Lest you fear: Chastened Gensler confirmed as CFTC chairman: John Kemp

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')As a precaution, Sanders has "read" these commitments into the Senate record so there can be no dispute in future. It is the closest the Senate can come, within the Constitution, to making its "advice and consent" to Gensler's appointment conditional upon specific commitments about how the nominee will act in office.
The commitments essentially repeat statements Gensler had already made during his confirmation hearing and in a pre-confirmation letter to Senator Carl Levin (Democrat, Michigan) (https://customers.reuters.com/d/graphics/GENSLER.pdf) and elements of the administration's derivatives reform plan released last week.
The key commitments are:
* Enactment of a broad regulatory regime to cover over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives that would include moving standardised products onto exchanges, clearing them via a central counterparty, and subjecting them to conservative margining requirements.
* Closing the so-called "London loophole" that allowed U.S.-based counterparties to trade futures contracts on U.S.-delivered commodities from terminals in the United States but via an exchange registered in London to avoid U.S. position limits and reporting requirements.


IEA puts a number on supply crunch: three years to go

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')ay 20, 2009 11:18am
by Kate Mackenzie

Warnings of an oil supply crunch have been frequent and vocal in recent months. As oil prices fell from their peak in July, so did plans to invest in future oil production - and the world’s oil reserves are becoming increasingly difficult to get at, making investment even more important.

The IEA is joining the fray and has come out with its clearest warning yet that the world is headed for a supply crunch. In a new report, the agency reportedly warned that oil companies and investors have postponed about $170bn of projects, equivalent to about 2m barrels per day, and a further 4.2m in future oil supply capacity has been delayed by at least 18 months.


China will be ready to begin devouring energy again, if they haven't already, they are opening new refineries, building SPRs, spending over 14 times on real stimulus than they did on the most expensive Olympics in history, etc. etc. US VMT hasn't budged much. There are plenty of other indicators that growth could be robust short term, also you have to wonder if the data isn't being massaged to give the market confidence, and this is most definitely a con(fidence) game being played at the moment.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 20 May 2009, 10:35:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')peculators helped push oil to $147.


The speculation myth | Sunov Petroleum Advisers

The cross plot for net long/short positions is a dandy.


I take it you were not moved by the 60 minutes piece on speculators? I'm not a financial expert but I think it's clear that speculation contributed to the ultra-fast runup to $147 when we were seeing prices leap $20+ in a single day. (This is disregarding some of the cornucopian stuff in the 60 minutes piece about supply going up and demand going down.) I really think the support price was more like $100-110. High, but not insta-doom.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby AAA » Wed 20 May 2009, 10:48:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DoomWarrior', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Voice_du_More', '
')Other than OilFinder, how are you all seeing this new data?


Unfortunately, given our current data, we cannot say with any statistical significance that oil production peaked in 2008. We're currently on top of an undulating plateau, and until there's a clear drop-off (or until Saudi Arabia concedes that its oil production has peaked), we will not be able to observe "peak" with complete confidence.


I agree 100% and will take it a step further...we will not be able to mark the actual peak until DECADES after the actual peak. I believe we will be on a plateau for several years and oil production could go higher before it goes into permanent decline.
How can Ludi spend 8-10 hrs/day on the internet and claim to be homesteading???
User avatar
AAA
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Wed 12 Nov 2008, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby copious.abundance » Wed 20 May 2009, 11:24:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Voice_du_More', 'H')ave you ever considered that the economic crash has been at least partly caused by the run up in oil prices and that the recession is actually coming at just about the right time to hide peak oil? Have you ever looke closely at the predicted output form Iraq past 2012 and thought that it was quite odd that Iraq somehow factored into PNAC back in 1999. Imagine if we were here today and Saddam were still in control of Iraq, I'll bet Paul and Don imagined that very thing in 1998.

We have really entered into a bad place have'nt we guys. I've had it in the back of my mind and it has deeply effected me but I am having to come to terms with two things, 1) that I know there are very deep connections between the major events of the last decade 2) that I have to sit down and try to understand what I should do with that knowledge.

The run-up in oil prices did not cause the recession. This has been discussed ad nauseum. As I showed here, the run-up in prices led to increased production. Would not an increased supply of oil enable a continued economic expansion? According to the peaker mantra that economic expansion requires more oil, yes it would. But in spite of that increased oil output, the economy crashed anyway. I could - and have - make a similarly ridiculous argument that the spiking price of wheat causes recessions. Correlation does not imply causation.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Wed 20 May 2009, 12:44:42

The ridiculous run up in prices spurred what anyone would consider a meager production increase. As others and myself have already pointed out the increase was not enough to take us statistically off the plateau. If you believe that it did, than your more steeped in cornucopia than even i thought. Production will never follow some smooth curve perfectly correlated to price. It didnt then and it isnt doing it now.

The market is pricing in what it sees. Green shoots. Demand is not down as significantly as folks think, the dollar is in real trouble, and everyone who can is going to start buying lots of oil while it still may be pretty cheap (China). Also the refiners are making a statement by refusing to accept crappy margins. Plenty of folks are screaming bloody murder about industry capitalization and the future resulting from not enough of that.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby copious.abundance » Wed 20 May 2009, 13:01:00

I would not call a 3+ milion bpd increase - TWICE - in the span of 5 years to be a "meager" output increase.

Image

From spring '04 to spring '05 crude production went from about 71.4 million bpd to about 74.3 million bpd.

Then from summer '07 to summer '08 it went from about 72.2 million bpd to about 75.2 million bpd.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby copious.abundance » Wed 20 May 2009, 15:14:03

Here is a chart demonstrating that the free market, does, in fact, work.

I superimposed a chart of Jan 04 - July 08 oil price onto a chart of crude oil production from the same time period.

Oil price chart I got here.
Oil production chart I got here.
Both are monthly averages.

Image

Notice that, as the price went up from 2004 to mid-2006, production also did. In the 2nd half of 2006 the price declined, and - surprise! - so did production. In early 2007 the price started going up again, and, with a bit of a lag, so did production, setting a new production record to go along with a new price record.

Amazing! Economics works!
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby copious.abundance » Wed 20 May 2009, 15:22:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'D')on't you ever get tired of obvious data manipulation?

I gave my data sources. Prove to me that the prices and production figures I showed are manipulated.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby TheAntiDoomer » Wed 20 May 2009, 15:29:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'D')on't you ever get tired of obvious data manipulation?


Weak weak response, OF2 provided two graphs overlayed with no manipulation along with their sources. Don't you ever get tired of making false accusation?
"The human ability to innovate out of a jam is profound.That’s why Darwin will always be right, and Malthus will always be wrong.” -K.R. Sridhar


Do I make you Corny? :)

"expect 8$ gas on 08/08/08" - Prognosticator
User avatar
TheAntiDoomer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Wed 20 May 2009, 15:51:54

The simple fact remains that statistically we are on a plateau. Lately we are actually falling off of it!!! Yes there is a possibility that oil production may go above the last peak in the future. But you have to ask yourself what is the probability of that. Then ask can we sustain growth above that increase?

If your being objective and consider the dynamics of what is presently going on in the world, it does not appear to be a very high probability. Non OPEC oil is declining. Soon that decline will increase in it's rate. At that point there is little probability given what we know about discoveries and Saudi claimed reserves, that growing much above where we are is possible over the longer term. Even with spare capacity, growing above a 6% or even a 3-4% global decline will make that basically impossible with current trends in discovery.

I try to find positive news, but despite OF's blind optimism he hasn't found enough new oil to make these dynamics change appreciably. We might stay on a plateau for just a bit longer, but inevitably we are going to enter decline. My personal belief is that around 90mbpd (total liquids) will be all she wrote. After that there will be no more. I believe that oil has seen near its top forever and only through the magic of adding ever ridiculous sources to the "total liquids" number can we possibly hold off the forever decline.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby peripato » Wed 20 May 2009, 19:13:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'H')ere is a chart demonstrating that the free market, does, in fact, work.

I superimposed a chart of Jan 04 - July 08 oil price onto a chart of crude oil production from the same time period.

Oil price chart I got here.
Oil production chart I got here.
Both are monthly averages.

Image

Notice that, as the price went up from 2004 to mid-2006, production also did. In the 2nd half of 2006 the price declined, and - surprise! - so did production. In early 2007 the price started going up again, and, with a bit of a lag, so did production, setting a new production record to go along with a new price record.

Amazing! Economics works!

Yeah, but in this case it was not able to meet red-hot worldwide demand during this time, since at the rate of increase for CC since 1994 (~1.8%) at least an additional 5 million barrels of CC should have come on-stream during this period 2004-2008, however far less than half of this amount actually did materialise. Moreover since 2005 the supply of CC has stubbornly refused to go very much higher, despite the industry swimming in cash, although they tried their best, in which they only managed to wring out a meagre 300,000 bs p/d extra- ergo the huge and sustained run up in price during that period, as capacity was breached and breached again.
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality
Top

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby copious.abundance » Wed 20 May 2009, 21:07:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peripato', 'Y')eah, but in this case it was not able to meet red-hot worldwide demand during this time, since at the rate of increase for CC since 1994 (~1.8%) at least an additional 5 million barrels of CC should have come on-stream during this period 2004-2008, however far less than half of this amount actually did materialise. Moreover since 2005 the supply of CC has stubbornly refused to go very much higher, despite the industry swimming in cash, although they tried their best, in which they only managed to wring out a meagre 300,000 bs p/d extra- ergo the huge and sustained run up in price during that period, as capacity was breached and breached again.

???

How do you know 5 million bpd of cc "should have" come on-stream during this time? Must demand increases always be linear?

As already pointed out, the decline in production from mid-2006 to mid-2007 was because the price had declined in the 2nd half of 2006. That is the reason for the apparent "plateau." Then when the price went up again, production skyrocketed by over 3 million bpd in about a year. Production is simply responding to the price. If the price increase had been steady without the 2006 interruption, you would also have gotten a steady increase in production.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby shortonsense » Thu 21 May 2009, 01:54:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheAntiDoomer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'D')on't you ever get tired of obvious data manipulation?


Weak weak response, OF2 provided two graphs overlayed with no manipulation along with their sources. Don't you ever get tired of making false accusation?


I predict PTheStarr won't show back up in this thread without a double clutch of the following type:

"When I meant data manipulation, well, you know, ummm.....and actually read the links...and checked them...well..obviously...its because there is no locally available meat in all of America and peak oil caused it!"
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby peripato » Thu 21 May 2009, 02:05:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peripato', 'Y')eah, but in this case it was not able to meet red-hot worldwide demand during this time, since at the rate of increase for CC since 1994 (~1.8%) at least an additional 5 million barrels of CC should have come on-stream during this period 2004-2008, however far less than half of this amount actually did materialise. Moreover since 2005 the supply of CC has stubbornly refused to go very much higher, despite the industry swimming in cash, although they tried their best, in which they only managed to wring out a meagre 300,000 bs p/d extra- ergo the huge and sustained run up in price during that period, as capacity was breached and breached again.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '?')??


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow do you know 5 million bpd of cc "should have" come on-stream during this time? Must demand increases always be linear?

You need a increasing supply of oil to support a growth in the economy and population. Whether you believe that oil is a causative factor or merely an incidental indicator of growth, nevertheless the two do seem to swing in tandem, and boy did we ever have growth, thanks to all that cheap money, during this time.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s already pointed out, the decline in production from mid-2006 to mid-2007 was because the price had declined in the 2nd half of 2006. That is the reason for the apparent "plateau." Then when the price went up again, production skyrocketed by over 3 million bpd in about a year. Production is simply responding to the price. If the price increase had been steady without the 2006 interruption, you would also have gotten a steady increase in production.
Your being disingenuous since it takes several years for new production to come online. The oil we saw produced during that period was going to come along anyway, since it had been under development for some time beforehand - barring a direct comet hit to good ol' planet earth of course. What's interesting is that, and despite sustained high oil prices with all the incentive in the world to produce more as a result, during that period of worldwide green light growth the industry was barely able to surpass the peak seen in May 2005, which can only be put down to the 6%+ on average depletion levels for existing wells that are now operative. Viva the superstraw effect!
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality
Top

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby drbobguy » Thu 21 May 2009, 02:26:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'D')on't you ever get tired of obvious data manipulation?

I gave my data sources. Prove to me that the prices and production figures I showed are manipulated.


You know I registered to this forum just to demonstrate how this "manipulation" works. You didn't manipulate the data, what you did manipulate is the presentation of the data. And you did this by ignoring the scale of the images and the zero offset. That is, the scale of the images is completely incomparable. I don't think you intentionally did this, but your copy/pasting methods don't work. If you want a good lesson on how to do this properly, check out Edward Tufte's The Visual Display of Quantitative Information.

Your graph of world liquid fuel production is skewed because you don't show us the real baseline. Here it is as I've edited:

Image

Now we see that for what it is with a real zero baseline. It means that the changes as a percentage are much less than what it looks like when you redefine the baseline to be 78. Again, I'm not saying you purposefully did this, and the data is still real, you are just skewing it.

So now we do the same thing for the oil price image. And then to compile them we define their maximums to be 100% and superimpose the two. This is what you get:

Image

So you see price has varied wildly with production hardly changing at all (as a percentage). Note I whipped that image together so it's not accurate to the pixel, but it's pretty close.
drbobguy
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu 21 May 2009, 01:43:28
Top

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby peripato » Thu 21 May 2009, 02:39:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('drbobguy', 'Y')ou know I registered to this forum just to demonstrate how this "manipulation" works. You didn't manipulate the data, what you did manipulate is the presentation of the data.

Why thank you drbobguy, you have put in pictures what so many of us have been trying to say in words; that despite heroic efforts by the industry they were barely able to grow supply during the period of a massive run-up in the oil price.

Squeezing blood from a stone as they say...
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality
Top

Re: Are we ready to declare peak '08 yet?

Unread postby Voice_du_More » Thu 21 May 2009, 03:45:51

Clearly I wonder at OF2's real motivation for spending so much time here trying to tell us all that there is no problem. I suspect that he/she and other cornucopians, or even moderates here are in denial and they keep coming back here because somewhere deep inside they smell doom in the arguments but are not ready to admit that to themselves. It does'nt realy matter, it probably is good for us to have to try to unravel some of these arguments and data that are presented.

That said, I do not think that scaling the graphs is all that necessary in a comparison, though yes I agree with the idea that graphival information is often interpreted incorrectly because things that look the same size on paper may be thought of that way. So pick a baseline that makes it look like oil production rose the same amount on paper as price did and alot of folks might consciously or otherwise feel like there is a connection being put forth.

The idea that the industry would for so long fail to invest properly in infrastructure so as to ensure the continued growth of such a vital resource speaks for itself. If the industry and the oil producing nations had real hope that there was ever going to be a 3 or 5% consistent YOY growth in supply they would be falling all over themselves to keep their infrastructure and labor pools growing as well. Actions speak loudly, I was recently told, and I believe it.

The notion that oil companies would underinvest to the point of letting the pipelines rust in place so as to gouge the public is flawed, it is not good business in the case where one expects the source of that business to keep growing. It is frugal business to try to get as much as you can for as little as possible, but short term strategies like we are seeing now do not indicate anyone in the business really has hopes of either significantly more oil being found or large amounts of existing oil being brought to market in the near future.

For me, and this is why I started this thread, all of the canaries are either dead or noticeably ill without much hope of recovery.

All the PTB can hope to do in my opinion is manage the powerdown and the media coverage so as to avoid a panic starting too soon. They definitely have to let price rise but not catastrophically, this creates the possibility of a shortage in a few years. Eventually depletion has to become so severe that our modern economies cannot bear it. All of this points to major and shocking changes in the world in the years just ahead.

The game theory constraints I am considering right now are these: Do the major players wait and see if everybody plays nice or do they start trying to out-maneuver each other for the best position well ahead of the expected timeframe of serious impacts? Some would say that the US has already positioned itself in Iraq, but since Obama seems unwilling to fully continue the policies of the neocons Iraq will probably be all for nothing as far as oil security goes.

In the end I think we are too late to do much and all games will come to an end much sooner than the world will come to understand what happened.
User avatar
Voice_du_More
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue 02 Sep 2008, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests