by stonecypher » Thu 14 May 2009, 01:04:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jasonraymondson', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'A')gain, this is cracking me up. Google is mostly matching Wolfram point for point..
As in, "what is the GDP in France / Italy." Google gives you the same darn answer Wolfram does..
A couple things seem to be unique to Wolf though, such as asking it the weather in Springfield on a certain date. Wolfram knows you're in the US, so assumes you mean the Missouri Springfield.
Also, Wolfram seems to have Google beat as far as punching in equations into the search bar. But maybe not, I may not be using the right terminology for the built-in Google calculator.
So yes, Wolf is an advancement is some areas.. but I remain annoyed that so many of the "whiz-bang" feature examples can be duplicated with the exact same query punched into Google.
The developers would serve themselves better if they focused on what Wolf can do that Google cannot. It just strikes me as almost plagiarism for the developers to suggest that WOLF is the first search engine that can answer questions like "what is the GDP in France?". It's just simply not true, Google answers almost all of these questions just as well (in many cases better, as in much more info).
Are you high? seriously, I don't want to be rude... but you have no idea what you are talking about. All google does is provide you links, and none of them relevant.
Googles information is out of date, normally giving you results 3 years old or worse.
I also type in those responses. Links to pages that did not answer the question. Do you work for google? I mean seriously, what the hell are you thinking?
There is no comparing google to this. There just isn't
wow
Stunningly impressive video! I'm often disconcerted by your posts, Jason, but this is one time when I think your comments are right on the money.
"In other words, Wolfram Alpha is like a beefed-up, research-oriented take on Google's computational extras (stock price, calculator, unit conversion), but with Aspergers.
I'm aware of the theoretical differences between the two, and I'm sure Wolfram Alpha's creators' blood would boil at the thought, but the engine's most natural home might be as a direct complement to Google, as a tab on their homepage or as a replacement for their modest current nonsearch functions."