Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Chrysler Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Without Concessions Chrysler Will Close All Canadian Plants

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Thu 12 Mar 2009, 01:36:21

Fuck 'em, let them go. They are going to close the plants anyway, I say don't give them a frigging dime.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Without Concessions Chrysler Will Close All Canadian Plants

Unread postby bencole » Thu 12 Mar 2009, 02:10:17

The big 3's days are numbered in Ontario I think.
bencole
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Thu 26 Feb 2009, 03:29:52

Re: Without Concessions Chrysler Will Close All Canadian Plants

Unread postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Thu 12 Mar 2009, 02:44:15

Yeah, let em go. Like the could bring the costs down more by switching production back to the US which right now is 1.29CDN. There's your 25$ difference buddy.
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

Re: Without Concessions Chrysler Will Close All Canadian Plants

Unread postby Novus » Thu 12 Mar 2009, 23:12:22

Chrysler is finished and will be shutting all plants world wide shortly.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00


Re: Without Concessions Chrysler Will Close All Canadian Plants

Unread postby Blacksmith » Thu 12 Mar 2009, 23:39:57

It seems every time I go into a crysler dealership I get told what I will get because that's what "people" want, when I tell them what I want I can't get it or it will have to be special ordered.

I first encountered this in the sixties when I describe a car to a salesman and was promptly told it would never sell. The car I described was a volkswagen.

These people need leasons in listening, instead of talking.

As for the unions they can suck the hind tit.
Employed senior
Blacksmith
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Athabasca, Alberta

Re: Without Concessions Chrysler Will Close All Canadian Plants

Unread postby Ferretlover » Thu 12 Mar 2009, 23:50:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Blacksmith', 'I')t seems every time I go into a crysler dealership I get told what I will get because that's what "people" want

That's what I always hear when we buy furniture. My response: "Are those people going to pay for my furniture? No? Then, I could care less what those people want." (And, yes, my husband thinks I'm funny!)
As for the Big 3: they are examples of companies whose greed has zombie-ized them into believing the Big Lies. How do people that dense get so high up the proverbial ladders?? And, everytime I see a car ad on television, Iwonder how they expect people with no jobs to pay for their overpriced merchandise.
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: Newsweek: Chrysler, R.I.P.

Unread postby IslandCrow » Thu 30 Apr 2009, 09:19:26

Bump

BBC had a news flash (too early for a story to be posted yet):$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]BREAKING NEWS:

US carmaker Chrysler is to declare bankruptcy, a White House official says


------------
Edited to add link that is now up: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8027109.stm

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')hrysler is to enter bankruptcy protection after failing to persuade its main lenders to write off its debts, a White House official has said.

President Barack Obama is now due to make a statement later on the future of the struggling US carmaker.
We should teach our children the 4-Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Rejoice.
User avatar
IslandCrow
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Finland

Re: Newsweek: Chrysler, R.I.P.

Unread postby hillguy57 » Thu 30 Apr 2009, 20:26:20

Just watched the PBS news. They outlined the planned ownership after they go through chapter11.
55%uaw,30%Fiat,10%USgov,5%candiangov.
How's that for a cluster#$%@
User avatar
hillguy57
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri 29 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Newsweek: Chrysler, R.I.P.

Unread postby PWALPOCO » Fri 01 May 2009, 07:59:41

OOooops !!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') group representing 20 Chrysler lenders, holding $1bn (£674m) in debt, are set to object to the firm's move into Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Chrysler said on Thursday it would enter protection immediately and form an alliance with Italian carmaker Fiat. The 20 lenders are unhappy at the terms of a government-brokered deal to cut Chrysler's $6.9bn (£4.67bn) in debt. The group also says that plans to sell off Chrysler assets within 30 to 60 days may infringe their legal rights.

Mr Lauria has said that Chrysler's proposed plan "inverts" the usual priority scheme, whereby senior secured creditors are paid in full first, followed by junior lenders, administrative claims, unsecured lenders and equity holders.


Looks like someones trying to hotwire the system to get Chrysler through bankruptcy without paying off the secured lenders properly. This could take some time to resolve .......


Paul
All that it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
User avatar
PWALPOCO
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun 02 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: North Wales , UK

Re: Newsweek: Chrysler, R.I.P.

Unread postby rangerone314 » Fri 01 May 2009, 08:12:12

I didn't cry when E.T. or Old Yeller died, and I'm not going to die when Chrysler and GM die, either.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: Newsweek: Chrysler, R.I.P.

Unread postby bratticus » Fri 01 May 2009, 21:12:07

So what are we supposed to say now?!?!

"The Big Formerly 3"?

"The Big Two"?
User avatar
bratticus
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bratislava

Re: Newsweek: Chrysler, R.I.P.

Unread postby VMarcHart » Fri 01 May 2009, 21:32:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', 'S')o what are we supposed to say now?!?! "The Big Formerly 3"? "The Big Two"?
Back in the late '80s, there were the Big 8 of accounting and auditing. Now they're down to Big 4.
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California
Top

Re: Newsweek: Chrysler, R.I.P.

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sat 02 May 2009, 00:47:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PWALPOCO', '[')url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8028427.stm]OOooops !![/url]
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..

Mr Lauria has said that Chrysler's proposed plan "inverts" the usual priority scheme, whereby senior secured creditors are paid in full first, followed by junior lenders, administrative claims, unsecured lenders and equity holders.


Looks like someones trying to hotwire the system to get Chrysler through bankruptcy without paying off the secured lenders properly. This could take some time to resolve .......


Paul
The "usual priority" applies when it's the company's money. I don't think Chrysler has money to pay secured creditors or anyone else. The only money is bailouts from taxpayers, so the govt. gets to say who gets bailed.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Newsweek: Chrysler, R.I.P.

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sat 02 May 2009, 01:15:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8026621.stm]BBC: Can Fiat put Chrysler on road to recovery?[/url]
"I think it's madness," says independent automotive analyst Rob Golding.

Little to offer

These days, Chrysler's own cars - which also include the Dodge and Jeep marques - are hard enough to sell within the US, where sales have fallen off a cliff in recent months. Abroad it is even tougher.
Fiat Group's chief executive, Sergio Marchione
Analysts say Fiat Group chief Marchione is adding to his difficulties.

In fact, Chrysler has little presence outside the US. When its former Germany parent company Daimler sold Chrysler in 2007, sales outside North America accounted for no more than 7% or 8% of its sales.

But if Chrysler has little to offer Fiat - let alone anyone else - then the reverse is also true.

Fiat is similarly reliant on its home market, bolstered by Italians snapping up the majority of the Fiats, Lancias and Alfa Romeos it makes.

Hence, although it might come across as global on paper, the Fiat-Chrysler alliance is not about to become an international automotive giant that will seriously rival the likes of, say, Toyota, Volkswagen Group or Nissan-Renault.

Indeed, there is no way it could emerge as a serious rival without significant injections of cash.

"Who is going to provide the money?" asks Mr Golding. "Fiat can't possibly do it.

"Fiat is easily the weakest of all the major automotive companies. It does not even generate enough revenue to fund its own investment."
Sounds like Chrysler should have merged with GM. Or got themselves taken over by Daihatsu or Tata or Chery.

Fiat was founded:
On 11 July 1899 at Palazzo Bricherasio, the company charter of “Società Anonima Fabbrica Italiana Automobili Torino” was signed.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Newsweek: Chrysler, R.I.P.

Unread postby lowem » Sun 03 May 2009, 11:31:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', 'S')o what are we supposed to say now?!?!

"The Big Formerly 3"?

"The Big Two"?


The 3 Latest Additions to the :

List of defunct United States automobile manufacturers
Live quotes - oil/gold/silver
User avatar
lowem
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon 19 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Singapore
Top

Re: Newsweek: Chrysler, R.I.P.

Unread postby bodigami » Sun 03 May 2009, 14:24:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', 'S')o what are we supposed to say now?!?!

"The Big Formerly 3"?

"The Big Two"?


the survivors?
bodigami
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Chrysler Bond Holders & Banana Republic Investment Advice

Unread postby AlexdeLarge » Mon 04 May 2009, 09:33:09

http://finemrespice.com/node/56 Confronting the head of a non-TARP fund holding Chrysler debt and unwilling to release it for any sum less than that to which it was legally entitled without compelling cause, this country's "Car Czar" berated the manager of said fund with an outburst of prose substantially resembling this:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ho the Expletive deleted. do you think you're dealing with? We'll have the IRS audit your fund. Every one of your employees. Your investors. Then we will have the Securities and Exchange Commission rip through your books looking for anything and everything and nothing we find to destroy you with.
So what do think GM bond holders are thinking? How about anyone else who is thinking of investing in an American business?? Under Lord Obama's rule here in the Peoples Republic of America... ...good advice may be to invest somewhere else. In our new socialist paradise only certain "politically correct" special interest groups rights are defended. The Change You Can Believe In.......
Viddy well, little brother. Viddy well.
User avatar
AlexdeLarge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1806
Joined: Tue 20 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: I have a whole ward
Top

Re: Chrysler Bond Holders & Banana Republic Investment Advice

Unread postby vision-master » Mon 04 May 2009, 09:39:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AlexdeLarge', '[')url]http://finemrespice.com/node/56[/url]$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ho the Expletive deleted. do you think you're dealing with? We'll have the IRS audit your fund. Every one of your employees. Your investors. Then we will have the Securities and Exchange Commission rip through your books looking for anything and everything and nothing we find to destroy you with.
--snip-- The Change You Can Believe In.....
You still don't believe we are reaching the end of the age. Why not invest in a small farm?
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Chrysler Bond Holders & Banana Republic Investment Advice

Unread postby pup55 » Mon 04 May 2009, 12:28:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hy not invest in a small farm?


The government can "condemn" your small farm and take it from you with little or no compensation. Think I am wrong? Just do not pay your property taxes and see what happens.

But more to the point of the banana republic comment: When you do invest in a banana republic, your rate of return has to be sufficiently high or the investment sufficiently short term to compensate you for the risk you take.... The dangerous thing that the government is doing here is not allowing the price of the asset to drop to the point at which risk is compensated for....That's why private investors will not step to the pump on any of this. Of course, there are plenty of political reasons for not doing that, and the general public is temporarily allowing it to go on in order to avoid the pain.... but even in the banana republics, the chickens come home to roost eventually.

What we have is several hundred years of time in which the government pretty much left the landowners alone. That's because, ultimately, the landowners made the rules. It is another dangerous thing when the rule-making shifts to the non-property owners. Can you guess what's going to happen? The property owners will not have their property for much longer.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron