by pup55 » Wed 15 Apr 2009, 14:34:45
Background Info:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut less than one year before it is due to be completed, there is one major thing that the 1.1-million-square-foot tower, known as 11 Times Square, is lacking: tenants.
http://peakoil.com/forums/posting.php?mode=post&f=33$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')arcus & Millichap reported that in the coming year, asking rents countywide are expected to drop an average 5.2% to $29.08 per square foot. What the landlord is likely to get will dip an average 6.4% to $23.94 per square foot.
http://www.miamitodaynews.com/news/090416/story7.shtml$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')limbing vacancies and softening rents could raise commercial real estate delinquencies, now at around 1.3 percent, to between 25 and 35 percent, if money doesn't begin to flow soon. Office values are already down 35 to 45 percent, he estimated.
http://peakoil.com/forums/posting.php?mode=post&f=33http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/14/BUVO1727T3.DTL&type=businessIn light of the above background articles, I have a story for you....
I work for a family-owned corporation, I suppose you would say it is moderately sized, in a heavy manufacturing situation....We were leasing one of six buildings in a little industrial park in a semi-rural/exurban type area.
About a year ago, the lease in the building we were leasing at the time (about 7500 s.f.) expired. The landlord had just put the finishing touches on a new building right across the parking lot, and one of the alternatives on the table at the time was to rent both buildings, thus avoiding the need to relocate (we needed more space). The conversation was had that some break might be given on the rent to keep our company around.
The landlord refused, despite the fact that his new building was empty, and we had to relocate. We constructed a new building, farther out in the country. The company is not debt financed, so they shelled out about $1M for the land, construction, and finishing touches on this new building, which is about 3 times the size. It's nice. I get my own office (for the moment).
The situation now is:
A. the former landlord cannot rent out the building we were in, also, he cannot rent out the building that he built last year ( I assume this probably cost him in the neighborhood of $200K to put up the metal building). We can easily estimate how much money he is losing every month with these buildings empty, and also, how much he is having to pay out in financing because unless he has deep pockets, he had to borrow money to buy/build this development.
B. Our company paid the peak price for the land and building where we now are. The thinking at the time was, we would buy this building in the direction where a lot of the real estate development was going, and eventually they would make money on the appreciation of the property. Naturally the rate of return calculation made some assumptions about the level of business/business growth that was expected over the next 10 years or so.
C. Side point: No one is happy at the moment. Orders have slowed way down.
Predictably, the former landlord has sued us. He claims that he cannot rent out the old building because we left it too dirty. The lawyers are involved. Never mind the fact that he cannot rent out the new building either, which is pristine.
The former landlord bought the whole development a couple of years ago when it was worth something. Presumably he financed the whole thing at the time, and it's now 1/3 empty, and really questionable if it will ever regain its "value" in his lifetime. He is in his 60's I think.
So it is clear that everybody involved screwed up. The landlord screwed up by not recognizing TSHTF and reducing the rent to keep us in there. He assumed that he was a commercial property genius, buying this development when things were hopping, and could easily re-rent the place once we were out.
The boss screwed up by not waiting awhile to build the new building and move, because he might have been able to get an even better price on an empty building in the area. Perhaps the company screwed up by buying the building, rather than renting someplace and preserving their capital. Unlike a publicly owned company, they are operating on a 25-year time horizon, so they may still come out okay eventually.
The only potential winners on the horizon are the lawyers.
So no one knows how this will all turn out yet, but the chances of the developer going belly up are excellent. Whoever he borrowed the money from will be SOL when it is payment time. The chances of our 100-plus year old parent company going belly up are probably low, but the pool of cash on hand is shrinking, and is not bottomless....so they are not happy either.
So this is a little story about how decisions were made in these businesses about a year ago that are now looking pretty bad, based on expectations that this year would be sort of like the previous 20, and this is just on a small scale. You can imagine what is going on at the big scale, in some of these giant manufacturing developments, and big commercial property markets.
p.s. I tried to 'splain to the boss about the hazards in making a long-term commitment to this stuff because of variety of sustainability topics at the time, but he never did connect the dots as they applied to his own decision to build the new place. Go figure.