by copious.abundance » Fri 15 May 2009, 13:38:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', 'H')ee hee, too easy...
"Most promising"
"improving the chances"
"very encouraging"
"could be commercially producible."
Once again you've published a story based on nothing more than wishing and hoping. Its a science project, and will be for a very long time.
You continually repeat this accusation, and by doing so you continually make a hypocrite of yourself.
Oil production "could have" peaked in 2005. Or 2008.
Natural gas production "might be" peaking in 10 or 20 years.
You are wishing and hoping these things will peak, because you don't like them.
EROEI and "available energy" are mere academic "science projects."
And so on and so forth,
ad nauseum.