by dorlomin » Fri 27 Mar 2009, 11:42:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cbxer55', 'T')his article puts forth the notion that China is out to take over as the world's leading economic power. After all they continued buying our toilet paper, even after knowing some three years ago that this economic crisis was coming. They now have us over a barrel.
this was the theory being circulated for several years up until late last year. Now that the US government can in effect print its own money the Chinese ability to threaten to dump treasuries is diminished if not eliminated.
But in terms of 'wealth' I don’t really think China is currently all that wealthy. They are pretty low on the production chain, although not at the bottom. They assemble running shoes, but other countries tend to cut the pieces that require assembly. They do not design and market them, they are not OEM originators of IT kit, they do not design and manufacture jet engine to rival GE, RR or P&W. What they have done is steam rollered many of the other manufacturers out of business as they throttled up there sweat shop juggernaut. Allegedly about half of the commercial loans issued to Chinese businesses are non performing, this may be an exaggeration or a misrepresentation but when you are growing at 12% pa, you can cover for a lot of bad loans. The allegation is this acts as a sort of subsidy for Chinese manufacturers over other low end producers. But they are now in a bind, hovering up textile, chemical, steel production and black goods assembly jobs from the US, Africa, Indonesia, Haiti and other parts of the world is easy, but you also need buyers, they have been undermining there customers in the west and filling up so much of the potential manufacturing in industries that you run out of areas to grow into.
Chinas currency reserves are very large, but its balance of trade is only slightly larger than Germanys, is also only slightly bigger. Yes its raw volume is huge but it has not been moving up the chain of supply all that quickly and has not really been developing internal markets fast enough to replace loses int he west.
I am not sure it has real 'wealth'. It currently lacks the creativity of Japan, S Korea
or India, it lacks the strong sets of laws and rules that have taken several centuries to evolve in mature capitalist societies (although Hong Kong pretty much has them), it lacks the respect for property and the freedom to challenge authority that is often central to the creative process. Many of these same charges could be laid at mid 19th century France and Germany, at early 20th century Japan and early post war South Korea and Taiwan. All nations that have adopted the follower model and eventually caught up with and exceeded the granddaddy of industrialisation Great Britain. Clearly China can catch up and become an innovative society. But as it currently stands it is not.
In my opinion I do not think the Chinese economy is mature enough yet to assume the role of global hegemon. And they have huge internal problems.