by virgincrude » Mon 16 Mar 2009, 06:09:19
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090323/ehrenreich_fletcher?rel=hp_currentlyRising To The Occasion:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat is most galling, from a socialist perspective, is the dawning notion that capitalism may be leaving us with less than it found on this planet, about 400 years ago, when the capitalist mode of production began to take off. Marx imagined that industrial capitalism had potentially solved the age-old problem of scarcity and that there was plenty to go around if only it was equitably distributed. But industrial capitalism--with some help from industrial communism--has brought about a level of environmental destruction that threatens our species along with countless others. The climate is warming, the oil supply is peaking, the deserts are advancing and the seas are rising and contain fewer and fewer fish for us to eat. You don't have to be a freaky doomster to see that extinction may be what's next on the agenda.
In this situation, with both long-term biological and day-to-day economic survival in doubt, the only relevant question is: do we have a plan, people? Can we see our way out of this and into a just, democratic, sustainable (add your own favorite adjectives) future?
Let's just put it right out on the table: we don't. At least we don't have some blueprint on how to organize society ready to whip out of our pockets. Lest this sound negligent on our part, we should explain that socialism was an idea about how to rearrange ownership and distribution and, to an extent, governance. It assumed that there was a lot worth owning and distributing; it did not imagine having to come up with an entirely new and environmentally sustainable way of life. Furthermore, the history of socialism has been disfigured by too many cadres who had a perfect plan, if only they could win the next debate, carry out a coup or get enough people to fall into line behind them.
BARBARA EHRENREICH & BILL FLETCHER JR. on 'Reimagining Socialism' that horrid, dangerous, rash-inducing ideology Americans generally seem to find equates with EEeeevil .....
Obviously the answer doesn't lie in tired ideologies, politics as we know it has ended, but some combination of the best bits of each ideology offers some way forward, even if only in the short term. The hardest part, and most important in my opinion, is the challenge to change the way we think: we can't afford to simply throw out ideas because of their old connotations, or even because they 'failed' in the past: this is not the past and nothing is as we thought it was, or would be. Applying old solutions in a new way sounds counterintuitive, but what we need to assimilate is that we have to build the future right now, even without knowing what it will finally look like. There are few certainties, but I think it's pretty clear what we DON'T want .... no?
(Hint: a return to unregulated 'free market' conditions, unbridaled and irresponsible consumerism, cancerous 'continuous growth' based economies, etc.)