by rangerone314 » Thu 19 Feb 2009, 10:10:16
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', ' ')perhaps the interstate should be set up as a toll road (money to go to the federal government) as it passes through the "free states."
Then perhaps the states should charge the Federal Goobermint Rent on the land on which the roads are built for which they charge a toll upon which to drive? Anyhow, last time the Highways came up, the Highway Trust Fund was about broke so I wouldn't count on the Federal Goobermint doing much maintenance, at least once the Funny Money scheme runs out of Gas (pun intended).
In the event of secession, the Federal Goobermint ceases to exist, and so does the United States as a Nation-State. Of course some may vote to stay in and then go to war on those who secede to force them into the Union, we have been down that road before of course.
In the case of the original Civil War, you had the well-financed North versus the poorly financed South. Basically the Banksters used that war to gain control over the south and moved the labor up to their factories in the north under their form of Slavery, economic slavery.
Which is the well-financed side in the coming Civil War in the USA? What Banksters are left with any money to fund the next National Socialist Party in Germany?
The Ponzi scheme that started in 1694 has run its course, there IS no Deep Pocket to fund a war on any side for very long. That's not to say there won't be some serious fighting here both intra-country and inter-country, but in terms of building and maintaining a large mechanized army run on Oil to wage a world war with? Not enough easy to get at Oil for that to happen again.
However, within countries the battle for control will come between those who wish to rule themselves locally and those who wish to maintain their power by keeping a large population and large area under one rule and a single taxation base. Unless the Federal Goobermint actually DOES something for the country as a whole though, there is little reason anyone will support its continued existence. Its only pupose would be to run a single large military force to try to project power elsewhere in the world, but we are about out of resources to do that now anyhow. All we really need military forces now is for the purpose of defending our own locales and trying to maintain some order in this mess. States can do a better job allocating their own populations to those tasks as necessary, for a lot less money than is spent by the Pentagon.
The Soviet Union broke up into its constituent states once it could no longer afford the apparatus to keep such a large state together. Our Union is older and more entrenched, but its fundamentally the same problem and unless something spectacularly odd happens, over time this conglomeration will disintegrate also. How long it will take is anyone's guess though. I'll wager it takes about a decade to fall apart. Ludi can add that one to the Bold Predictions thread. LOL.
Reverse Engineer
In general, a pretty good breakdown of things...
I do disagree a little with the timing... I don't think that it will take about a decade to fall apart... I'm guessing more like two decades. Of course I could be wrong if this current economic situation spirals out of control.
I figure by two decades the dollar/national debut/current accounts deficit issues will have come to a head, as well as oil/food production declines.