by big goat » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 20:07:12
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')aving been threatened by Matt himself the last time I had the audacity to even mention his dustup with his ex forum administrator, I have no desire to start THAT nonsense again, so I'm glad you referenced all the relevant information.
Yea, I saw that too. My take on it is that the Survival Acres guy took advantage of the situation and made a timely rumor that he knew would makeSavinar go ballistic. Savinar IMHO had every right to be pissed about such a nasty rumor too, but I doubt if there was any truth in it; just a spat between two competing freeze dried food salesmen from what I could see.
But if you are still sore I will quote from the Rules of Professional Conduct of The California State Bar:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')ule 5-100. Threatening Criminal, Administrative, or Disciplinary Charges
(A) A member shall not threaten to present criminal, administrative, or disciplinary charges to obtain an advantage in a civil dispute.
(C) As used in paragraph (A) of this rule, the term "civil dispute" means a controversy or potential controversy over the rights and duties of two or more parties under civil law, whether or not an action has been commenced, and includes an administrative proceeding of a quasi-civil nature pending before a federal, state, or local governmental entity.
Rule 1-400. Advertising and Solicitation
(D)(5) Be transmitted in any manner which involves intrusion, coercion, duress, compulsion, intimidation, threats, or vexatious or harassing conduct.
Im not advocating this, but in my opinion Savinar was over the line. If you want to make a complaint to the California Bar you are probably justified. Knock yourself out.