Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Canary: Censorship of PO

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby Micki » Mon 16 Feb 2009, 18:58:20

That is really up to you but preferably "belief" in something so important should result in some action;

1) spreading information anchors the knowledge on a broader base
2) spreading information increases the likelihood that those who are in a position to do something concreate get informed and/or get spurred to action

Spreading of information can be via forums, verbal discussions, letter to papers, handout flyers etc.

3) bug your politicians and other leaders.
4) support groups that work to protect our civil liberties
5) get active with groups protecting our civil liberties
6) go ape on the whole system

The last one of course comes with some increased risks.
Micki
 

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 16 Feb 2009, 19:09:03

I don't really see why I need to believe TPTB are going to "get me" to do those things, but OK. :)
Ludi
 

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby Pops » Mon 16 Feb 2009, 20:05:49

Jeeze S_W & Miki do you actually "DO" anything or do you just talk?

I'm going to guess you only loaf here on your boss's bandwidth because if you were as paranoid as you portray you would have ripped out every wire in your house and certainly wouldn't be posting on a site this high on Google's list.

Not really a PO Discussion topic I'm thinking...
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby AgentR » Mon 16 Feb 2009, 20:16:30

TPTB want you here, and not on the street. If you are here, you are at a keyboard, in a room, mostly quiet. If you bail to the doomstead, you are out of the way and no longer of any interest.

People on the street do dumb things and break physical infrastructure that requires resources to repair. People at a console make pixels.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby efarmer » Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:25:30

Don't look behind that curtain Dorothy, TPTB are back there. Just pet
Toto and follow the yellow brick road.

Hey, I think I may be coming up to speed on this stuff, howsa bout
you Pops?
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby Serial_Worrier » Sat 21 Feb 2009, 06:50:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'T')PTB want you here, and not on the street. If you are here, you are at a keyboard, in a room, mostly quiet. If you bail to the doomstead, you are out of the way and no longer of any interest.

People on the street do dumb things and break physical infrastructure that requires resources to repair. People at a console make pixels.


Stalin called those people "wreckers" and sent them to the gulag. 8)
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby Pops » Sat 21 Feb 2009, 15:39:30

On reflection Miki, I shouldn't have included you in that little rant.

It dawns on me that many time it seems the people who rant about big brother, executive orders, internment camps, etc are the same who chime in at voting time with "It doesn't matter, they are all the same."

IOW, "It's useless, I'm helpless, we're dead."

So my apologies to you.


P.S. efarmer, I have a football helmet under my foil hat as protection from the flying monkeys.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby dorlomin » Sun 22 Feb 2009, 18:01:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'T')PTB want you here, and not on the street. If you are here, you are at a keyboard, in a room, mostly quiet. If you bail to the doomstead, you are out of the way and no longer of any interest.

People on the street do dumb things and break physical infrastructure that requires resources to repair. People at a console make pixels.

Actually no. Quite a number of people involved in things like Reclaim the Streets, Campaign Climate Change, the Newbury Bypass Protests and other very high profile environmental activists actions are regular 'post whores' on some of the forums I post on. The most prominent would be the likes of the Anarchist forum urban 75 in the UK.

The internet has provided a huge tool for the small clique of politically active types to interact with less active but interested people. It has helped overcome the inertia created by TV and sparked a renaissance in political activism here in the UK in the good times!

I take what I learn here and distribute it around various political sites in the UK. The net is a huge tool for allowing people around the world to interact and exchange ideas. It is literaly the most important tool to decentralise the distribution of information since Gutenberg.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 22 Feb 2009, 19:35:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Repent', 'T')he powers that be, believe their own propaganda! Talk to anyone you know who is in an establishment position; such as a police official, a government lawyer, a CEO or such. These people who only read and hear the censored media content of newspapers, magazines and TV- they won't know a fraction of the real news that is out there on the blogsphere.

The won't know that the world economy would have completely tanked if the US government hadn't bailed out AIG in October last year. They won't know about the impending threats of peak oil. They will have no understanding of the implications of systemic collapse, entropy, die off, or lynch mobs.

The powers that be have little or no understanding of the true power of blogsphere news. Anything that isn't mainstream and conservative is beyond their comprehension. They also reject non-establishment ideas. So they also reject internet news as irrelevant, marginal, and counter-culture in content, leaving themselves victims to their own mindset.

Try it! Ask people in power who don't use the internet- then you'll have your answer.


Agree whole heartedly. Those in power, or beholden to those in power, drink their own cool-aid. Look at how many filthy rich people got taken by Madoff. Anyone reading economic or political blogs would have recognized immediately that it was a potential scam.

The bubble economy was part of a self replicating parallel reality, encased in an information bubble, without external inputs. It has a "matrix" quality to it, but also a kind of fractal nature. See below. This could be why the Mandlebrot set is compelling but a bit disturbing. It approximates visually, what can happen with information in the mundane world.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tRdLD6v ... re=related
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Mon 23 Mar 2009, 00:06:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'T')PTB are not going to shut down this site.

Nah, they'll probably just sabotage the software, making it painfully difficult to post anything.

-------------------------

SUBMIT!!! DAMN YOU!!!! (I'm addressing the software.)
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby Voice_du_More » Mon 23 Mar 2009, 02:45:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'T')PTB are not going to shut down this site.

Nah, they'll probably just sabotage the software, making it painfully difficult to post anything.
-------------------------
SUBMIT!!! DAMN YOU!!!! (I'm addressing the software.)

It's odd how some things can be so funny and therefore encouraging within a totally depressing context. :roll:

I think we would all (even us here) be surprised at soe of the things that the 'PTB' find worthy of spending our tax dollars on. Sometimes people just get a sense about things and they realize that what appears to be small is in fact very large with most of it's potential hidden in abstract theories and odd religious or political ideologies.

I think that a cohesive group holding enough power would entertain alot of crazy stuff if they thought it would be a threat and they would do alot of odd things to try to counteract the perceived threat. For instance consider Nixon listening to Gene Dixon. As one example
User avatar
Voice_du_More
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue 02 Sep 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 23 Mar 2009, 09:08:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '
')It dawns on me that many time it seems the people who rant about big brother, executive orders, internment camps, etc are the same who chime in at voting time with "It doesn't matter, they are all the same."

IOW, "It's useless, I'm helpless, we're dead."


The term I use for that is cynical fatalism. Whining is the only thing they do to make them feel better. The internet is an ideal opiate for whiners. I also ultimately think humor is a defense mechanism. That's why people flock to Colbert and Stewart. But ultimately it's not going to change things unless you become engaged in the process.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby outcast » Mon 23 Mar 2009, 10:58:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'O')n reflection Miki, I shouldn't have included you in that little rant.

It dawns on me that many time it seems the people who rant about big brother, executive orders, internment camps, etc are the same who chime in at voting time with "It doesn't matter, they are all the same."

IOW, "It's useless, I'm helpless, we're dead."

So my apologies to you.


P.S. efarmer, I have a football helmet under my foil hat as protection from the flying monkeys.



There's a lot of whacked out paranoids around here (on the website), many holed up on their doomsteads to make their own custers last stands against the evil g00bermint.
Y2K is real. Y2K is going to rock our world.
-Kunstler

Don't respond, I'll just ignore it.
-MonteQuest
User avatar
outcast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon 21 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby jasonraymondson » Thu 26 Mar 2009, 15:45:35

Guys, to much paranoia is a very bad thing. It is wise to not trust your government, but living in constant fear means you are not living at all.

Stop freaking out over tiny little things, the universe tends to unwind as it should.
jasonraymondson
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2727
Joined: Wed 04 Jul 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Peace Out

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby big goat » Wed 08 Apr 2009, 23:55:14

Sorry, I usually just lurk but couldnt resist this one. I think it may be wise before you groupthink this idea to death to actually consider some evidence.

The entire idea of peak oil is soon to be under attack, and the attacks were predicted in advance, and are already disrupting LATOC. It looks like whats happening may even destroy that site.

This one is long, but worth looking at, as this guy has an amazing track record and it is evident he is dialed in somewhere.

http://dennisfromoregon.com/forum/index ... pic=1627.0

Read it to the end and you will see what I mean.

Then go check out LATOC, who are in a tizzy over alleged copyright violations.

http://www.doomers.us/forum2/index.php/ ... 642.0.html

http://www.doomers.us/forum2/index.php/ ... 493.0.html

http://www.doomers.us/forum2/index.php/ ... 608.0.html

http://www.doomers.us/forum2/index.php/ ... 20559.html

It appears to me that Savinar is engaged in a desperate attempt to save his forum. He has already whacked over 450,000 posts, yes, over four hundred and fifty thousand.

It is just starting too. Watch your copyright practices, as there may be extreme penalties involved.
big goat
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed 08 Apr 2009, 21:54:51

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby shortonsense » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 01:14:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('big goat', 'S')orry, I usually just lurk but couldnt resist this one. I think it may be wise before you groupthink this idea to death to actually consider some evidence.

The entire idea of peak oil is soon to be under attack, and the attacks were predicted in advance, and are already disrupting LATOC. It looks like whats happening may even destroy that site.

This one is long, but worth looking at, as this guy has an amazing track record and it is evident he is dialed in somewhere.

http://dennisfromoregon.com/forum/index ... pic=1627.0

Read it to the end and you will see what I mean.

Then go check out LATOC, who are in a tizzy over alleged copyright violations.

http://www.doomers.us/forum2/index.php/ ... 642.0.html

http://www.doomers.us/forum2/index.php/ ... 493.0.html

http://www.doomers.us/forum2/index.php/ ... 608.0.html

http://www.doomers.us/forum2/index.php/ ... 20559.html

It appears to me that Savinar is engaged in a desperate attempt to save his forum. He has already whacked over 450,000 posts, yes, over four hundred and fifty thousand.

It is just starting too. Watch your copyright practices, as there may be extreme penalties involved.


I posted nearly the EXACT same question myself after seeing the archives which I frequent quite often ( them being better than what the place has devolved down to ) and this evening I noticed 8 pages of archive, going back maybe a month, in a place which used to have hundreds of pages stretching back years.

Having been threatened by Matt himself the last time I had the audacity to even mention his dustup with his ex forum administrator, I have no desire to start THAT nonsense again, so I'm glad you referenced all the relevant information.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 13:50:53

Too funny. Who is AP?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 14:14:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shannymara', 'I')n this case, AP is Associate Press. :)


How coincidental is that. You had two simultaneous posts on two threads about the identity of AP! The collective unconscious is giggling. :o
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 15:07:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jasonraymondson', 'G')uys, to much paranoia is a very bad thing. It is wise to not trust your government, but living in constant fear means you are not living at all.

Stop freaking out over tiny little things, the universe tends to unwind as it should.



The registration of every gun in America is not a "tiny little thing".
In Pittsburgh the other day three cops lost their lives to one person determined to not give up his guns. Extrapolate the numbers to the number of gun owners that feel that strongly about it and this by itself may be the tipping point on when TSHTF.

Edit: I was reading two threads back and forth and stuck this post on the wrong one. It should be over on the Pelosi gun registration thread but in a way fits here. First your guns then your free speech.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Censorship of PO

Unread postby big goat » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 20:07:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')aving been threatened by Matt himself the last time I had the audacity to even mention his dustup with his ex forum administrator, I have no desire to start THAT nonsense again, so I'm glad you referenced all the relevant information.


Yea, I saw that too. My take on it is that the Survival Acres guy took advantage of the situation and made a timely rumor that he knew would makeSavinar go ballistic. Savinar IMHO had every right to be pissed about such a nasty rumor too, but I doubt if there was any truth in it; just a spat between two competing freeze dried food salesmen from what I could see.

But if you are still sore I will quote from the Rules of Professional Conduct of The California State Bar:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')ule 5-100. Threatening Criminal, Administrative, or Disciplinary Charges

(A) A member shall not threaten to present criminal, administrative, or disciplinary charges to obtain an advantage in a civil dispute.

(C) As used in paragraph (A) of this rule, the term "civil dispute" means a controversy or potential controversy over the rights and duties of two or more parties under civil law, whether or not an action has been commenced, and includes an administrative proceeding of a quasi-civil nature pending before a federal, state, or local governmental entity.


Rule 1-400. Advertising and Solicitation

(D)(5) Be transmitted in any manner which involves intrusion, coercion, duress, compulsion, intimidation, threats, or vexatious or harassing conduct.



Im not advocating this, but in my opinion Savinar was over the line. If you want to make a complaint to the California Bar you are probably justified. Knock yourself out.

Here is the form you will need:

http://calbar.ca.gov/calbar/pdfs/DispComp.pdf
big goat
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed 08 Apr 2009, 21:54:51
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

cron