by Cid_Yama » Fri 04 Mar 2011, 07:43:24
The OPEC Race For Quotas And Now For Statistical Credibility
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t was in the autumn of 1986, after world crude oil prices collapsed, that the issue of OPEC's distribution of production quotas arose. OPEC's crude oil output then had fallen to 16m b/d and it was very difficult to divide that number among the member-states. With some members demanding a "scientific" method of allocating quotas, OPEC spent the next two years in fruitless discussions. Experts proposed such factors as oil reserves, annual budget needs, production capacity, the country's size by area or population, etc.
As member-ministers agreed oil reserves could be a factor, huge revisions of reserve numbers ensued. Thus, OPEC's proven reserves rose from 530 billion barrels in 1985 to 637 billion in 1986 and to 755 billion in 1988. Some countries increased their reserves by 100% overnight and others went as far up as almost 200%.
That raised doubts about the authenticity of the numbers and OPEC lost credibility, especially since no support documents were required for the process. Some members - especially those who counted on their sovereignty for resource nationalism - considered reserves a state secret.
OPEC finally dropped the reserves and other "scientific" parametres for quota allocations and considered excess production capacity as a guideline for the setting of production limits, or targets. Soon reserve revisions became less sharp and less frequent.
Writing in Gulf News of Oct. 18, Saadallah al-Fathi, an Iraqi downstream expert now based in Dubai who, in 1986 became head of the Energy Studies Department at the OPEC Secretariat in Vienna, recalled: "It was finally realised that it is what hits the market that matters most and not what lies underground or what the Iraqis would call the ability to load the truck with melons' quota allocation is a political accommodation process among member countries, nothing more and nothing less".
"Therefore", he added, "it is very hard to understand the reasons for sharp reserves' additions announced in the past few years and especially in the past few weeks. Take Canada, for example, where reserves were close to five billion barrels in 2005 but Canada started reporting 30 times as much in what it called tar sands oil, unconventional oil whose production goes up and down with the price of oil.
"This prompted Venezuela to revise its oil reserves up from 80 billion barrels in 2005 to 211 billion in 2009 on account that its unconventional heavy bitumen deposits had become economical to produce due to rising oil prices.
"Will these numbers go down if oil prices collapse? I doubt it".
link
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry
The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.