by copious.abundance » Sat 17 Jan 2009, 01:59:36
But just because some people here are really dumb and I'm bored and like to prove people wrong who make up things or have no idea what they're talking about, here's what the CBO's latest economic forecast (released on Jan. 8 ) actually has to say on the matter:
-->
The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2009 to 2019 <--
Go to page 5:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]CBO’s Economic Projections for Calendar Years 2009 to 2019
[...]
Fourth Quarter to Fourth Quarter (Percentage change)Real GDPEstimated 2008: -0.4
Forecast 2009: -1.5
Forecast 2010: 3.0
Projected Annual Average 2011-2014: 4.0
Projected Annual Average: 2.3
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
-

copious.abundance
- Fission

-
- Posts: 9589
- Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
- Location: Cornucopia
-
by bratticus » Tue 20 Jan 2009, 09:43:12
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'B')ut just because some people here are really dumb and I'm bored and like to prove people wrong who make up things or have no idea what they're talking about, here's what the CBO's latest economic forecast (released on Jan. 8 ) actually has to say on the matter:
-->
The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2009 to 2019 <--
Go to page 5:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]CBO’s Economic Projections for Calendar Years 2009 to 2019
[...]
Fourth Quarter to Fourth Quarter (Percentage change)Real GDPEstimated 2008: -0.4
Forecast 2009: -1.5
Forecast 2010: 3.0
Projected Annual Average 2011-2014: 4.0
Projected Annual Average: 2.3
I totally don't get how the GDP will get better while unemployment is getting worse.
Unemployment rate /// Real GDP
Estimated 2008: 5.7% /// -0.4%
Forecast 2009: 8.3% /// -1.5%
Forecast 2010: 9.0% /// 3.0%
How does that work?
by the48thronin » Tue 20 Jan 2009, 10:17:25
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', '
')I totally don't get how the GDP will get better while unemployment is getting worse.
Unemployment rate /// Real GDP
Estimated 2008: 5.7% /// -0.4%
Forecast 2009: 8.3% /// -1.5%
Forecast 2010: 9.0% /// 3.0%
How does that work?
Two different models, BUT having said that.. if many of the unemployed come from the lower paid sector, while the masters of the universe continue to demand humongeous raises to prevent their leaving the floundering companies they have led so well ( 'Scuse my rant, back to the subject), If most of the unemployed receive at least 52 weeks of unemployment or if the government intervenes with some feel good retraining program to provide the missing income...VOILA`.
Just a passing thought.
Malthusian Riders Member!
Courtesy and Courage Sincerity and Self-control Honor and Loyalty a Code to Live By!
What do the miners do when the canary dies? EVACUATE THE MINE not argue about the color of it's feathers or buy a parrot instead.
Where is my pitchfork and torch? I need them for a visit to the castle!
-

the48thronin
- Tar Sands

-
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Fri 30 May 2008, 03:00:00
- Location: On the highway, or the water somewhere!
-
by the48thronin » Tue 20 Jan 2009, 16:28:09
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('the48thronin', 'T')wo different models...
So are they both true?
If you factor in the amount of TRUE any number given by governmental agencies is.
Inflation will never look to the actual retail buyer as it models out after variable "volitiles" are removed by the government models.
Unemployment has been tinkered with so often no one I know accepts the government number as anything but the latest propaganda from the in house numbers twisters.
Ronald Reagan needed instant better numbers so he added the entire U S Military in to the mix. ( they all were employed LOL).
Jimmey Carter needed better numbers so he decided anyone not filing for government checks was not unemployed. The official number means nothing as even the IRS admits the off the books ( in mexico they call it casual employment) payroll is somewhere between 20 and 30% of low wage earners.
Getting back to the question that started this;
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', '
')I totally don't get how the GDP will get better while unemployment is getting worse.
Unemployment rate /// Real GDP
Estimated 2008: 5.7% /// -0.4%
Forecast 2009: 8.3% /// -1.5%
Forecast 2010: 9.0% /// 3.0%
How does that work?
I thought I was clear enough, but can try again.
Spending is not employment. If the government spends millions and millions bailing out industries, those sales ( when the industry spends the bailout) and the resultant sales of products produced need not creat JOBS for those unemployed. The multiple levels of oversight the government will establish over those programs that do creat some jobs will eat massivly more money than those jobs will pay. The end result will be money changing hands which will reflect into the GDP models, but not necessarily into the unemployment counting.
Yes Virginia when you are the government .... there is a Santa Claus for all your contributers and political friends...
by copious.abundance » Tue 20 Jan 2009, 22:17:40
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'B')ut just because some people here are really dumb and I'm bored and like to prove people wrong who make up things or have no idea what they're talking about, here's what the CBO's latest economic forecast (released on Jan. 8 ) actually has to say on the matter:
-->
The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2009 to 2019 <--
Go to page 5:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]CBO’s Economic Projections for Calendar Years 2009 to 2019
[...]
Fourth Quarter to Fourth Quarter (Percentage change)Real GDPEstimated 2008: -0.4
Forecast 2009: -1.5
Forecast 2010: 3.0
Projected Annual Average 2011-2014: 4.0
Projected Annual Average: 2.3
I totally don't get how the GDP will get better while unemployment is getting worse.
Unemployment rate /// Real GDP
Estimated 2008: 5.7% /// -0.4%
Forecast 2009: 8.3% /// -1.5%
Forecast 2010: 9.0% /// 3.0%
How does that work?
Employment is usually a lagging indicator. It usually takes a while for companies to lay off and re-hire employees as the economy gets bad and then good again. A great example of this was in ~2003, when GDP had a couple of really strong quarters while employment levels continued to drop.