by pup55 » Fri 16 Jan 2009, 15:57:13
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he media embrace airline crash stories because flying is how media people get around.
[rant] LOL the media embrace airline crash stories because it gives them interesting filler material both before and after the commercials, which they need to sell in order to make money.
Airline crashes are particularly good because they're relatively short in duration (the actual drama only lasted an hour or two) and the rest of it is expert analysis, interviews with slack-jawed witnesses, animations, flight simulations and a lot of filler that is fairly cheap to produce.
The more breathless they sound, the more likely you are not going to hit the remote button and surf over to Andy Griffith.
It must be heartbreaking for them to have the election be over. A four-year campaign gone.... what will they use for news? We are desensitized to bad news from Iraq, Iran, Afghan, India/Pakistan, and the multi-decade debacle that is the "holy land". Our eyes are glazed over.
Blago in Chicago gave us some entertainment for a week, but in a week or two more, he will be thrown out of office, the poor Senator guy will have had his first affair, and he will have already taken his advance for his next book deal.
Sarah Palin.... need I go into detail on this? The political equivalent of Anna Nicole Smith. You just can't stop watching.... because you know it's only a matter of time before she says something totally stupid, and you don't want to miss it.
Maria Bartiromo? LOLOLOL
There is no way to make it better. The system is set up to find, as quickly as possible, the lowest common denominator, to maximize the viewing audience, thus getting higher advertising rates.
Sorry, I am in that kind of frame of mind today too.[/rant]