Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Airbus Betting Pond Scum Will Replace Petroleum

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Airbus Betting Pond Scum Will Replace Petroleum

Unread postby yesplease » Thu 25 Dec 2008, 18:45:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'I')f only the Pentagon and DARPA would read PeakOil.com, they would KNOW, beyone a shadow of a doubt, that pursuing algae-based fuel is a worthless endeavour!
How is it worthless to them? They have different criteria for assessing fuel sources compared to most.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Airbus Betting Pond Scum Will Replace Petroleum

Unread postby Southpaw » Fri 09 Jan 2009, 10:31:06

seriously what's the point in discussing some kind of technology that doesn't even exist in the real world.

Sure I believe that it's possible that sometime in the future maybe in 10 years from now that we can fly some airplanes on algae and maybe cars, assuming that there is no other alternative by then.

The reason why Mr. bush invested so much in Corn ethanol probaby is because he knew that algae isn't viable for a long time.

I'm getting tired of this hype in algae that it will take all our problems away and that it's a miracle cure to keep exponentional growth going. A bunch of propaganda to me
User avatar
Southpaw
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Airbus Betting Pond Scum Will Replace Petroleum

Unread postby TomSaidak » Tue 13 Jan 2009, 22:19:35

Southpaw wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he reason why Mr. bush invested so much in Corn ethanol probaby is because he knew that algae isn't viable for a long time.


The irony....... Written in defense of someone who couldn't figure out an occupation strategy for Iraq, written by someone who probably ( And I apologize in advance IF I am wrong...) doesn't even know what the Vietnam CAP program was that would have informed him of what an intelligent military policy in both Afghanistan and Iraq would have looked like.

I don't know whether to laugh or cry....
Every problem has its solution, and every solution has its problems....
User avatar
TomSaidak
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon 22 Dec 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Airbus Betting Pond Scum Will Replace Petroleum

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 01:06:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'I')f only the Pentagon and DARPA would read PeakOil.com, they would KNOW, beyone a shadow of a doubt, that pursuing algae-based fuel is a worthless endeavour!
How is it worthless to them? They have different criteria for assessing fuel sources compared to most.


I'm pretty sure he's being sarcastic. I think what he meant to say is that we have sure proof that the military are interested in this, but a few here would never even consider it a remote possiblity, as they are alternatives-phobic.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Airbus Betting Pond Scum Will Replace Petroleum

Unread postby yesplease » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 03:25:32

If I had a dollar every time I missed picking up on these things... :shock:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Previous

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron