by TonyPrep » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 03:50:25
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', 'A')re we about to experience a hyper spike in the oil price, or are the recent estimates from the EIA complete garbage?
I'm inclined to think the latter. What methodology does the EIA use to make those estimates? Can you give me a convincing reason why those estimates should be trusted?
To be honest, I've no idea why they should be trusted. However, I offer this. I've noted that many supply deficits over the past year seemed to get revised to slight surpluses, in later STEOs. However, the deficits in October and November actually got revised as bigger deficits. This wasn't what I was expecting. Now, the EIA, the IEA and OPEC are the only sources of data that the public have access to, on a monthly basis. Should we disregard all the data? I've heard that the weekly stock estimates are very dodgy but the best in the business, but they seem to be accepted without question. Why? The STEO gives very early estimates for the most recent month, so one would expect significant revisions over time. Maybe the increasing deficits of the last 3 months will turn out to be surpluses but it's not looking like heading that way, at the moment.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'I')f demand is massively outstripping supply, what is the mechanism that is keeping the price down? And how is it that stockpiles are surging?
Demand isn't massively outstripping supply but consumption seems to be massively outstripping production. I don't have any estimates of global stocks, other than the STEO numbers. Can you point to opposing data that shows global (not US or OECD) stocks surging?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')bundant oil supplies in a decreasing market and dropping tanker freight rates have combined to form an increase in floating storage, said the International Energy Agency in its monthly oil market report. Tanker operator Frontline Ltd. said 20-25 oil supertankers, representing 50 million bbl of oil storage capacity have been hired for floating storage in recent weeks.
by TonyPrep » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 16:17:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aahala2', 'I') don't see what you see on this. I see the 4 mbd difference, butwhy is this eye-popping?
Because it is much larger than any deficit for the last 6 years, well over double all previous December deficits, since 2002 (which was 10% lower than the latest estimate) and completely counter to the perceived wisdom that demand is crashing.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aahala2', 'P')roduction and consumption as shown on the chart are measuring different things.
Yes, because crude oil needs to be processed to be used. The difference is entirely consistent with the stock draw line, however. Positive stock draw is an indication that production is not meeting consumption of the stuff that people use.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aahala2', 'A')pparent consumption sounds like an estimate to me.
The whole table is an estimate, which is why I usually use the word, when referring to data sets like this.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aahala2', 'I') went back on the table to 2002 I believe it was and in every December since, production was less than consumption. It were fairly substantial diffferences in some years and fairly even in others.
All Decembers during that period showed deficits well down on December 2008. It was eye-popping to me because it was at least double all previous Decembers during the period back to 2003, significantly higher than December 2002, and well over double the deficits in Decembers 2001 and 2000. December 1999 would also have been eye-popping, at over 5 mbpd.
by yesplease » Tue 10 Feb 2009, 02:29:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', 'S')ince "all fuels" presumably include various biofuels that take enormous quantities of oil to produce, probably in some cases more in energy terms than they get out, there is clearly some double counting going on with that which makes it quite a bit worse than useless.
If by "enormous quantities of oil" you mean we're trading about one gallon of liquid fuel for one and a half to two gallons of liquid fuel, then we're on the same page.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
by yesplease » Tue 10 Feb 2009, 02:35:08
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aahala2', 'I') don't see what you see on this. I see the 4 mbd difference, butwhy is this eye-popping?
Because it is much larger than any deficit for the last 6 years, well over double all previous December deficits, since 2002 (which was 10% lower than the latest estimate) and completely counter to the perceived wisdom that demand is crashing.
To be fair, the price run up to $145/bbl was associated with about one straight year, 11 out of 12 months specifically, of consumption exceeding production, with the previous two years following the same pattern, although there were more months where production exceeded consumption. I'm thinking it's a symptom of $35/bbl crude as opposed to a new trend, and it appears as if that's what most people in the market think too, but if this continues for the next year or few I expect prices would head upward just like they did over the past few years.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!