by ReverseEngineer » Tue 06 Jan 2009, 04:22:44
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '
')I really have no idea how it will all play out in reality, I can only play out scenarios in hypothetical. I will however report on it for as long as I can here on Peak Oil. For so long as the internet holds up, I won't run out of words. I guarantee it.
I can give you a hint:
In longer run Inuits will stay and whiteys will have to leave.
Very much like with Viking invasion of Greenland.
Any whiteys who stay will gradually end up assimilated by Inuit families, so most of their genes will gradually perish as time pass.
Those who try to maintain "racial purity" will end up hunted down at the end if they don't die out of cold and due to a lack of survival skills earlier.
Once oil age is over and American Empire crumbles most of high tech life support which Alaskans are taking for granted will be gone.
At that point Great Escape from Alaska will begin.
There is a good chance for you to join in.
Unfortunately for both the Inuit and the Aleuts, their lives were thoroughly destroyed by Big Oil. They survive mostly now as wards of the state, alcoholism is rampant and in areas were products distlled for human consumption are tough to come by, consuming anti-freeze is often substituted. In areas like Bethel, there are unsustainable homes built on the permafrost, and mostly the old ways of living in that environment have been given up to live in manufactured homes living on Permanent Fund checks and staying thoroughly drunk as much as possible.
A decent number of Inuit and Aleut have of course become integrated into the current society, but in terms of total contribution to the gene pool up here now, their numbers are relatively small. After die off of whatever numbers, relatively speaking what would be left would probably be a smaller version of the 2008 Census Estimates, which lists the folowing Ethnic Groups in percent of population:
White persons, percent, 2006 (a) 70.70%
Black persons, percent, 2006 (a) 3.70%
American Indian and Alaska Native persons, percent, 2006 (a) 15.40%
Asian persons, percent, 2006 (a) 4.60%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, percent, 2006 (a) 0.60%
Persons reporting two or more races, percent, 2006 4.90%
Persons of Hispanic or Latino origin, percent, 2006 (b) 5.60%
White persons not Hispanic, percent, 2006 66.40%
As you can see, just using these numbers, of what currently lives here now, your talking about 70% white, 15% Natives, 5% Asian and 10% everybody else. Even assuming a selective die off favoring the Native population, interbreeding through the gene pool would be pretty evenly distributed here leaning towards the white population that migrated here over the last 50 years or so.
In any event, I have no issues as far as which gene pool is dominant in the end here, hopefully it will be the one best suited for survival in the environment. What's the difference what set of genes gets carried on here, as long as SOME set gets carried along? The key would be that those that do make it through have good values, forswear the use of money and are beneficial to the community and to the environment they take their sustenance from. I could give a flying hoot which gene pool makes the biggest contribution. That is completely irrelevant to the analysis of survival here.
Better luck next time EU.
Reverse Engineer