Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE US Tax Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Your current federal tax (as a percentage)?

Poll ended at Sun 03 Apr 2005, 15:29:51

0 to 5 percent
3
No votes
5 to 10 percent
2
No votes
10 to 15 percent
3
No votes
15 to 20 percent
4
No votes
20 to 25 percent
1
No votes
25 to 30 percent
5
No votes
> 30 percent
5
No votes
 
Total votes : 23

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby jdmartin » Fri 19 Dec 2008, 14:41:56

I think that the crap that the Feds are "buying" is not the actual mortgage, but the derivative of the bundle of like mortgages that makes the derivative an "investment". The bank, some bank, still holds the actual mortgage.

If the property taxes are not paid, the state will put a tax lien on the property. How long after that it can be sold for the taxes depends on the state. Eventually, the state will auction it off to pay the taxes, the bank will bid what they're owed on the property, they'll get it back minus the taxes and fees owed. So eventually the bank will pay the taxes anyway, unless they simply don't want the property anymore.

It may not be written in the Constitution about one gov't taxing another, but as a longtime local gov't executive I'm unaware of any situation that exists in the US where one level of government directly taxes another level of government.
After fueling up their cars, Twyman says they bowed their heads and asked God for cheaper gas.There was no immediate answer, but he says other motorists joined in and the service station owner didn't run them off.
User avatar
jdmartin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Merry Ol' USA

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Fri 19 Dec 2008, 15:05:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jdmartin', 'I') think that the crap that the Feds are "buying" is not the actual mortgage, but the derivative of the bundle of like mortgages that makes the derivative an "investment". The bank, some bank, still holds the actual mortgage.

If the property taxes are not paid, the state will put a tax lien on the property. How long after that it can be sold for the taxes depends on the state. Eventually, the state will auction it off to pay the taxes, the bank will bid what they're owed on the property, they'll get it back minus the taxes and fees owed. So eventually the bank will pay the taxes anyway, unless they simply don't want the property anymore.

It may not be written in the Constitution about one gov't taxing another, but as a longtime local gov't executive I'm unaware of any situation that exists in the US where one level of government directly taxes another level of government.


This post makes the assumption that the original bank which issued the mortgage exists, which in many cases already it no longer does exist. Its already gone under and subsumed into another bank. Why would any bank want said property? It ALREADY wasn't paying its bills to the last bank that owned it. It has no value to a bank if they can;t earn some interest off it. So it has to be devalued down here, and the banks don;t want to take the devaluation onto their books. So they go under, just like the Auto Workers go under because they won't take lower pay than they can afford to live on.

The point of this thread was to demonstrate the legal connections of taxes and property and absolute value. In the end, because nobody is paying the taxes on the prperties, the states can repo the properties and they no longer hold a lien on them after that. The debt disappears. Where s the legal liability here, who do you charge the lost value to? You cannot charge it to a bank out of business or a country gone bankrupt and out of business. There is no way to collect on this debt, it is IRREDEEMABLE debt.

You can of course fight wars over all the money lost here, but what good does that do? time to declare worldwide Jubilee, wash out all the debts which will never be paid off and start over. Nobody owns anything anymore. The whole sytem is down the toilet, geverments will topple and your property ownership goes with them. You only own what you can protect and hold onto now.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby Jotapay » Fri 19 Dec 2008, 15:59:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RedStateGreen', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'E')vidently from this story, Rahm Emanuel does not.

LINKY

Disclaimer: I have not yet had a chance to read through this completely yet, but it appears to hold some potential validity at first glance.

Debunked here.


Cool, thanks for posting that. That'll learn me to post things before I've verified them. :)

Ease up Mos, I posted a disclaimer than it hadn't been verified yet to my knowledge. :) But yeah, that was a dud. Gotta watch out for those.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby jdmartin » Fri 19 Dec 2008, 21:12:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '
')This post makes the assumption that the original bank which issued the mortgage exists, which in many cases already it no longer does exist. Its already gone under and subsumed into another bank. Why would any bank want said property? It ALREADY wasn't paying its bills to the last bank that owned it. It has no value to a bank if they can;t earn some interest off it. So it has to be devalued down here, and the banks don;t want to take the devaluation onto their books. So they go under, just like the Auto Workers go under because they won't take lower pay than they can afford to live on.

The point of this thread was to demonstrate the legal connections of taxes and property and absolute value. In the end, because nobody is paying the taxes on the prperties, the states can repo the properties and they no longer hold a lien on them after that. The debt disappears. Where s the legal liability here, who do you charge the lost value to? You cannot charge it to a bank out of business or a country gone bankrupt and out of business. There is no way to collect on this debt, it is IRREDEEMABLE debt.

You can of course fight wars over all the money lost here, but what good does that do? time to declare worldwide Jubilee, wash out all the debts which will never be paid off and start over. Nobody owns anything anymore. The whole sytem is down the toilet, geverments will topple and your property ownership goes with them. You only own what you can protect and hold onto now.

Reverse Engineer


You have some good posts that I agree with but this post shows that you've never dealt with anything like this in an official capacity. I work for local government. I have bid on property on behalf of the local government, at auction on the courthouse steps. You're making doomsday assumptions. I have never - let me repeat that - *never* - been to the sheriff's auction and witnessed a property where the bank did not show up to bid its note.

It doesn't matter if the original bank doesn't exist anymore, someone took over that mortgage. Show me proof, somewhere, that people are no longer able to pay their mortgage because they have no idea who to send the money to. Show me further proof of local governments that are not collecting property tax revenue on foreclosed/walk off houses because they don't know who to collect the money from.

I guarantee if a locality forces the sale on the courthouse steps, there will be someone there, from some bank, to bid the note on that house. To do otherwise would make no sense - you're claiming they're going to let these properties go back to the towns for a couple of thousand dollars in property tax, meaning they've lost their entire interest, yet they won't write them down because of the devalue? What's the devalue worth on a property in which you just pissed $400k down the drain over $10k in property tax???

Peakoil.com certainly has no shortage of experts on everything, I'll at least give it that :roll:
After fueling up their cars, Twyman says they bowed their heads and asked God for cheaper gas.There was no immediate answer, but he says other motorists joined in and the service station owner didn't run them off.
User avatar
jdmartin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Merry Ol' USA

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby nobodypanic » Fri 19 Dec 2008, 22:00:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jdmartin', ' ') I have never - let me repeat that - *never* - been to the sheriff's auction and witnessed a property where the bank did not show up to bid its note.


fair enough, but how many economic collapses have you witnessed where this was the case?
User avatar
nobodypanic
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Fri 19 Dec 2008, 23:10:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jdmartin', '
')
You have some good posts that I agree with but this post shows that you've never dealt with anything like this in an official capacity. I work for local government. I have bid on property on behalf of the local government, at auction on the courthouse steps. You're making doomsday assumptions. I have never - let me repeat that - *never* - been to the sheriff's auction and witnessed a property where the bank did not show up to bid its note.

It doesn't matter if the original bank doesn't exist anymore, someone took over that mortgage. Show me proof, somewhere, that people are no longer able to pay their mortgage because they have no idea who to send the money to. Show me further proof of local governments that are not collecting property tax revenue on foreclosed/walk off houses because they don't know who to collect the money from.

I guarantee if a locality forces the sale on the courthouse steps, there will be someone there, from some bank, to bid the note on that house. To do otherwise would make no sense - you're claiming they're going to let these properties go back to the towns for a couple of thousand dollars in property tax, meaning they've lost their entire interest, yet they won't write them down because of the devalue? What's the devalue worth on a property in which you just pissed $400k down the drain over $10k in property tax???

Peakoil.com certainly has no shortage of experts on everything, I'll at least give it that :roll:


Who is claiming to be an exert? I just raised some questions based on some pondering I was doing.

Insofar as Banks "always" bidding on these properties, what about that house in Detroit that took 9 days to sell for $1? Where was the bank for that one, Mr Real Estate & Goobermint Expert?

Finally, exactly how many Depressions have you been through where 90% of the Banks went out of business?

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby jdmartin » Mon 22 Dec 2008, 00:11:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '
')
Who is claiming to be an exert? I just raised some questions based on some pondering I was doing.

Insofar as Banks "always" bidding on these properties, what about that house in Detroit that took 9 days to sell for $1? Where was the bank for that one, Mr Real Estate & Goobermint Expert?

Finally, exactly how many Depressions have you been through where 90% of the Banks went out of business?

Reverse Engineer


Where do you see that 90% of the banks have gone out of business right now? As for "the house in detroit", you'll have to provide a link/source because I have no idea what you're talking about.

Posts like this make this Board look foolish. I'm relatively anti-cornucopian, but anyone coming by this site who reads this simply considers everyone here a bunch of dumbass alarmists. How that furthers the mission of educating the masses (or anyone, for that matter) is beyond me. Of course, it's entirely possible that the Board is really just a bitch-fest and has no relation whatsoever to reality, and isn't meant to be so much a place to share and disseminate information as it is a place to jack off together over doomer porn. And, if that's the case, then please ignore my contribution and carry on, Sailor :-D
After fueling up their cars, Twyman says they bowed their heads and asked God for cheaper gas.There was no immediate answer, but he says other motorists joined in and the service station owner didn't run them off.
User avatar
jdmartin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Merry Ol' USA
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Mon 22 Dec 2008, 00:25:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jdmartin', '
')As for "the house in detroit", you'll have to provide a link/source because I have no idea what you're talking about.

Posts like this make this Board look foolish.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]House sold for $1 in sign of US property crisis

In a sign of how desperate the property crisis has become in parts
of the US, a foreclosed house in Detroit has sold for just one dollar
=96 around 50 pence
=2E
Eventually a woman put in an offer but only finalised the deal after
the bank agreed to pay all her costs, the sales commission and back
taxes, together totalling $10,000.


http://www.worldpassports.org/australia_legal/244774

Who is looking foolish now, Mr Real Estate Expert Anti-Doomer? :-P

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby jdmartin » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 01:32:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '
')
Who is looking foolish now, Mr Real Estate Expert Anti-Doomer? :-P

Reverse Engineer


First off, nice cut and paste. That's the way to take my original post out of context, which was: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')here do you see that 90% of the banks have gone out of business right now?


Second, let's take a closer look at your $1 gem: according to the news article: the garage was burned to the ground; the house was completely stripped of all its siding, wiring, plumbing, doors, and fixtures; there were several thousand dollars in back taxes that hadn't been paid that the new buyer would ostensibly be responsible for; the house has been occupied by various squatters for some time; and the house sits in a ghetto. Bottom line, the house was really a tear-down, and the potential "buyer" would be buying the lot and its associated liens for $1.

That's a whole lot different than complete, viable houses being walked away from by the banks. Besides that, for such a "bargain", why didn't the state buy it for $1? After all, in your scenario, the state's going to own the property anyway, right? So why wouldn't the state simply pay the $1 and take title to the property they were going to sell for tax liens anyway?

PS: How the fuck does someone that joined this board 6 months ago get over 2,000 posts, and have anything worthwhile to say? It takes at least twice as much listening as talking in order to know what the fuck you're talking about :wink:
After fueling up their cars, Twyman says they bowed their heads and asked God for cheaper gas.There was no immediate answer, but he says other motorists joined in and the service station owner didn't run them off.
User avatar
jdmartin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Merry Ol' USA
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 02:02:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jdmartin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '
')
Who is looking foolish now, Mr Real Estate Expert Anti-Doomer? :-P

Reverse Engineer


First off, nice cut and paste. That's the way to take my original post out of context, which was: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')here do you see that 90% of the banks have gone out of business right now?


Second, let's take a closer look at your $1 gem: according to the news article: the garage was burned to the ground; the house was completely stripped of all its siding, wiring, plumbing, doors, and fixtures; there were several thousand dollars in back taxes that hadn't been paid that the new buyer would ostensibly be responsible for; the house has been occupied by various squatters for some time; and the house sits in a ghetto. Bottom line, the house was really a tear-down, and the potential "buyer" would be buying the lot and its associated liens for $1.

That's a whole lot different than complete, viable houses being walked away from by the banks. Besides that, for such a "bargain", why didn't the state buy it for $1? After all, in your scenario, the state's going to own the property anyway, right? So why wouldn't the state simply pay the $1 and take title to the property they were going to sell for tax liens anyway?

PS: How the Fark does someone that joined this board 6 months ago get over 2,000 posts, and have anything worthwhile to say? It takes at least twice as much listening as talking in order to know what the Fark you're talking about :wink:


I never said the place was a "Gem". But then, what Suburban house that nobody can afford to buy at the prices being asked or the costs involved in keeping up such a house IS a gem?

As time goes by here, you have less the Real Estate market you remember and weigh in on wit your expertiese and much more a market of homes foreclosed on and left empty for a year or more. Its apples and oranges. At a certain point, the house gets solkd for just the back taxes owed, in this case the bank actually paid all the closing costs amounting to over $10K, and the buyer got it for $1. Now WHY would any bank do that? Basically to get the liability off the books. It was worth it to them to spend $10K to make it HER problem, not THEIR problem.

Far as 90% of banks out of business, when you consider the major banks and their assets which have been merged out and whose assets have been absolrbed onto Fed balance sheets, I think we are already past 50% in failure on the net worth level. Give it another year, 90% failure rate seems highly likely to me, argue why you would not think this to be so please.

Finally, insofar as my ability to generate up more than 2000 posts in around 6 months (and some darn long ones too! lol), this is a personal GIFT of mine. :-) I write faster than most people read. I also read about 5 times faster than I write, so I don't have any trouble reading plenty to keep up with what others write and respond to the point. I do listen. I just write very, very fast also. ;-)

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby MarkJ » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 09:53:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o desperate was the bank owner of 8111 Traverse Street to unload the property that it agreed to pay $2,500 in sales commission and another $1,000 bonus for closing the $1 sale; the bank also will pay $500 of the buyer's closing costs. Throw in back taxes and a water bill, and unloading the house will cost the bank about $10,000....

The agent did say that the buyer agreed to pay the full list price of $1, and planned to pay cash.

The buyer, a local woman, considers the home to be an investment property and will not live there, Colpaert said, though exactly how soon the buyer can expect to recoup her four-quarter investment is questionable. Replacing the guts of the house will costs tens of thousands of dollars, and the owner will have trouble keeping scrappers from stealing the improvements as quickly as they're installed. Home demolition costs about $5,000, Colpaert said.

Meanwhile, the new owner will owe $3,900 in property taxes in 2009 on her dollar purchase unless she challenges the tax assessment.


Many vacant, abandoned, condemned city properties have a *negative value* due to high property taxes, back property taxes, back water/sewer bills and the cost of renovation, lead & asbestos abatement, demolition, hauling and landfill fees.

Renovation costs in bad sections of cities is extremely high and extremely risky due to theft and vandalism. You can't leave valuable materials, hardware, tools, equipment and vehicles on-site due to criminals, crackheads and squatters.

We see a continuous cycle of new investors that attempt to make a profit buying, renovating then attempting to sell or rent city tax auction properties.

Many of these investors give up before renovations are 50 percent complete. New landlords that manage to complete renovations often last less than 6 months. The cycle often repeats itself until the cities or government pays to demolish the structures.
User avatar
MarkJ
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 10:12:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkJ', 'M')any of these investors give up before renovations are 50 percent complete. New landlords that manage to complete renovations often last less than 6 months. The cycle often repeats itself until the cities or government pays to demolish the structures.


So what happens in the scenario where the City or Goobermint is out of money to pay for demolition? How does a bank offload such a property from their books then?

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby vision-master » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 10:39:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkJ', 'M')any of these investors give up before renovations are 50 percent complete. New landlords that manage to complete renovations often last less than 6 months. The cycle often repeats itself until the cities or government pays to demolish the structures.


So what happens in the scenario where the City or Goobermint is out of money to pay for demolition? How does a bank offload such a property from their books then?

Reverse Engineer

Image
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby MarkJ » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 10:52:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkJ', 'M')any of these investors give up before renovations are 50 percent complete. New landlords that manage to complete renovations often last less than 6 months. The cycle often repeats itself until the cities or government pays to demolish the structures.


So what happens in the scenario where the City or Goobermint is out of money to pay for demolition? How does a bank offload such a property from their books then?

Reverse Engineer


If the home, land and location is absolutely beyond hope, they'll effectively pay to wash their hands of the liability as mentioned above.

There's a fair amount of Neighborhood Stabilization funding coming to many regions which will help with demolition and renovation costs. The infrastructure stimulus will also help with the cost of bridges, roads etc.
User avatar
MarkJ
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 11:06:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkJ', 'I')f the home, land and location is absolutely beyond hope, they'll effectively pay to wash their hands of the liability as mentioned above.


Hello. CA is about 3 months away best case scenario from being out of cash to pay Retirement to its workers. You really think they are going to cough up funny money to pay contractors to demolish buildings here? Get real.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby MarkJ » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 12:08:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkJ', 'I')f the home, land and location is absolutely beyond hope, they'll effectively pay to wash their hands of the liability as mentioned above.


Hello. CA is about 3 months away best case scenario from being out of cash to pay Retirement to its workers. You really think they are going to cough up funny money to pay contractors to demolish buildings here? Get real.

Reverse Engineer


Who said anything about any specific region?

Even with a single state, county or city real estate values, employment opportunities and the amount of foreclosures and tax seizures vary substantially. In some cities a few hundred yards separate extreme wealth and extreme poverty.

In parts of Michigan or Ohio I could buy a home with the profits from a few boiler installations. Not that I'd be interested.
User avatar
MarkJ
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 12:23:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkJ', 'W')ho said anything about any specific region?

Even with a single state, county or city real estate values, employment opportunities and the amount of foreclosures and tax seizures vary substantially. In some cities a few hundred yards separate extreme wealth and extreme poverty.

In parts of Michigan or Ohio I could buy a home with the profits from a few boiler installations. Not that I'd be interested.


What is happenning in Detroit is a Canary in the Coal Mine. I do realize that right NOW, your particular market and your state might be bopping along just fine ;-)

What I am asking here is a theoretical question, and using Detroit as the example. So tell me how it plays out when the Goobermint does not have money to pay for demolition so you can put up another housing development to sell to upper middle class people who no longer exist?

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby MarkJ » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 13:01:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkJ', 'W')ho said anything about any specific region?

Even with a single state, county or city real estate values, employment opportunities and the amount of foreclosures and tax seizures vary substantially. In some cities a few hundred yards separate extreme wealth and extreme poverty.

In parts of Michigan or Ohio I could buy a home with the profits from a few boiler installations. Not that I'd be interested.


What is happenning in Detroit is a Canary in the Coal Mine. I do realize that right NOW, your particular market and your state might be bopping along just fine ;-)

What I am asking here is a theoretical question, and using Detroit as the example. So tell me how it plays out when the Goobermint does not have money to pay for demolition so you can put up another housing development to sell to upper middle class people who no longer exist?

Reverse Engineer


Well, Detroit is probably screwed since the federal neighborhood stabilization funding will only cover a small portion of their needs. I don't imagine they have much of a demolition & renovation budget with a shrinking tax base, declining property values and so many vacant, abandoned, condemned homes.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')e also reported that property crime in some Detroit neighborhoods had stabilized or declined because targets of opportunity were fewer now that most remaining residents are poor and many of the homes have been abandoned and cannibalized.

Trying to combat the blight, the city has applied for $47 million in federal neighborhood stabilization money, with half earmarked to tear down more than 2,300 vacant homes. About $8 million would be spent to rehabilitate vacant houses and $4 million to construct new houses.

But this effort would make only a small dent. About 44,000 of the 67,000 homes that have gone into foreclosure since 2005 remain empty, and it costs about $10,000 to demolish each vacant house, according to Planning and Development Department director Doug Diggs.

Overall, the residential real estate market is catastrophic, with the Detroit Board of Realtors now pegging the average price of a home in the city at $18,513. Some owners can't find buyers at any price.

"If you no longer can sell your property, how can you move elsewhere?' said Robin Boyle a professor of urban planning at Wayne State University. "Some people just switch out the lights and leave — property values have gone so low, walking away is no longer such a difficult option."
User avatar
MarkJ
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby jdmartin » Wed 24 Dec 2008, 00:08:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkJ', 'W')ho said anything about any specific region?

Even with a single state, county or city real estate values, employment opportunities and the amount of foreclosures and tax seizures vary substantially. In some cities a few hundred yards separate extreme wealth and extreme poverty.

In parts of Michigan or Ohio I could buy a home with the profits from a few boiler installations. Not that I'd be interested.


What is happenning in Detroit is a Canary in the Coal Mine. I do realize that right NOW, your particular market and your state might be bopping along just fine ;-)

What I am asking here is a theoretical question, and using Detroit as the example. So tell me how it plays out when the Goobermint does not have money to pay for demolition so you can put up another housing development to sell to upper middle class people who no longer exist?

Reverse Engineer


It costs almost nothing to demo a house. How do I know? I've signed demo orders, that's how, and signed the checks that paid for the haul-off. I can have an entire normal-sized house (say 1500 sf) on the ground and in a roll-off with 2 backhoes and a street crew in one day. If the city operates its own landfill, then the cost is essentially nothing since you're utilizing all in-house labor and equipment. And other than leaving a lot of wierd lots in residential neighborhoods, it's pretty simple and effective; you've got all the infrastructure in place if someone wants to build there in the future - water & sewer taps, electrical feed, hell even driveways in some cases. Look at what Cleveland's done for examples.
After fueling up their cars, Twyman says they bowed their heads and asked God for cheaper gas.There was no immediate answer, but he says other motorists joined in and the service station owner didn't run them off.
User avatar
jdmartin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Merry Ol' USA
Top

Re: Who Pays the Property Taxes?

Unread postby MarkJ » Wed 24 Dec 2008, 10:27:21

Demo costs tend to be high in some regions due to high labor costs, strict codes and enforcement, underground oil tank removal, soil testing, asbestos/lead inspections, asbestos monitoring, asbestos abatement, lead abatement, hazardous disposal fees, transfer station fees, landfill fees etc.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')r. Rael says the city will try to negotiate the best deal it can with the banks that own the properties. But he worries that investors might swoop in, buy the houses for $20,000 or $30,000 apiece and rent them to families for $400 or $500 a month. "It does occur to me that we are in a race with the slumlords," he said.

Mr. Wood, the code inspector, has scoped out 37 potential candidates for demolition in Old Town. But the grant is only enough for the city to tear down four. Given the likely lead and asbestos hazards, city officials figure that buying and razing four houses alone will cost $300,000.


Demolition costs also vary by degree of difficulty. For example, tearing down a large multi-story structure with a shared wall, or tightly sandwiched between other structures can be quite costly. Many of these structures are mothballed rather than demolished due to extremely high demolition costs and/or fear of lawsuits from neighbors.

Single story homes with larger lots, no close neighbors, no lead, no asbestos and without a basement and little concrete can often be demolished, salvaged or moved quite cheaply. Outside the cities, the fire departments burn them down for practice, plus the county landfills often allow you to dump the remaining debris free of charge or at a reduced rate.

When I burned down several homes and three barns a few years ago, the county even picked up the debris free of charge.

Demolition costs are just a small part of the problem in many regions in comparison to obtaining ownership.




$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')url=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081215/OPINION01/812150340/1008/OPINION01]Fighting blight too tough in Detroit City Council should seek ways to streamline demolition process[/url]

Detroit has 44,000 abandoned homes, according to the Planning & Development Department. Of the $47 million Detroit was granted in federal Neighborhood Stabilization Funds, $14 million has been set aside to tear down more homes that stand as eyesores and dangers to the community. More than 1,000 such homes are being slated for demolition.

But money matters little in a process so bogged down in process. There are no less than eight steps between when the first blight complaint is lodged and the day the offending structure finally comes down, which can take anywhere from a year to 18 months.

The process requires multiple notifications of the homeowner, multiple inspections and multiple hearings. It can be derailed at any point. All the while the eyesore stands as a threat to personal safety and property values.

There is a complicated web of city, state, and federal law defending properties from premature demolition, which makes it tough for the Detroit City Council to streamline the process.

Sensing this confusion, a small but shrewd cadre of home buyers has taken to purchasing ramshackle homes -- not to rehabilitate them, but in the hope they'll be illegally razed by the city.

Once notified that their homes are targeted for demolition, these "reverse-flippers" play a shell game, transferring title among themselves so that Detroit will demolish the property without notifying its new owner.

When this happens, the owner sues and the city usually settles out of court to avoid costly legal proceedings. The legal system literally rewards selling Detroit short.
User avatar
MarkJ
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron