Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Pope Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby Free » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 19:38:51

"Catholics cure the sick, teach children, help the weak, and feed the poor."

Yes and they make a good living with it. And that's why they make sure that the people stay sick, uneducated, weak and hungry. Because if they were'nt they wouldn't need the church. That's why nobody in Europe is going to a church anymore, they don't need this humbug.
"Fortunately" there is no lack of supply of poor people in other parts of the world...
User avatar
Free
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Europe

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 21:14:54

Lorenzo, So you were serious? Oh lord.

Liberation theologists were largely outspoken Marxists? According to whose version of reality? They supported unions, and communitarian interests. They supported the rights of people to organize to defend themselves. Anyone seeking freedom must be regarded as Marxist, if this is the case. Jesus himself, who overturned the tables of the money changers in the temple---Marxist.

Labelling anyone who wishes to organize to escape persecution and oppression is typical of something the US right wing governments have been doing for years. Funny you are so hip to propaganda in some circumstances, but blind to the Roman Catholic use of propaganda.

The ironic thing is, groups of people world wide, labelled communist, ended up being targeted, and then they HAD to join the Communist camp simply for the protection and resources they offered. This happened in Viet Nam. The Viet Cong were nationalists who needed the resources the Chinese offered just to keep fighting, after they were labelled Communist and targeted. The Communism came after the fact. They started out being nationalists and ended up being pushed into the Communist camp.

The pope was largely credited, through symbolism alone, with bringing down the Berlin Wall. I assume he was more hostile about Communism than Fascism, as the church coexists perfectly with the fasism of the modern era. I doubt, by his actions alone that he had any grave fear of fascism. Totalitarian religion respects totalitarian states that in turn support it. It's a mutual back scratching and admiration society.

Your post is a rationalization of the atrocities perpetuated or created by the Catholic church. Your understanding of the church supporting indiginous people is seriously lacking. Read "I Rigoberto Menchu", the autobiography of a freedom fighter in Guatemala, and her dealings with the church.

The church is always there to apply a bandaid to a wound, but they would never question the underlying cause, because it could potentially alienate the tithing wealthy. Their pathetic "helpful" self image surely extends all the way to hell, where the cardinals have likely set up popsicle stands to deal with the heat.


I'm as conservative as you, possibly more so. But honestly, returning to the Middle Ages as a protest against rampant consumerism seems unnecessary. You are solving several problems with your conservatism, but creating many more by hanging onto the rotting corpse of Catholicism. Sh**, create your own religion. You're smart and passionate enough. God, what a waste.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby erl » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 00:47:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')atholics cure the sick, teach children, help the weak, and feed the poor.

Not one other group of people does this. If you know one, please let me know.


Hmmm.

Samaritan's Purse (not a catholic organization)

American Friends Service Committee (not a catholic organization)

World Vision (not a catholic organization)

Hope Seeds (not a catholic organization)

Crossroads (a Canadian non-catholic charitable organization)

Numerous independent church missions groups.

Just to name a few. Google it.

erl
erl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 580
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby threadbear » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 16:28:25

Erl, World Vision=CIA front.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Ebyss » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 17:05:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')atholics cure the sick, teach children, help the weak, and feed the poor.

Not one other group of people does this. If you know one, please let me know.


I'm just sticking my head back in here because I can't believe you think that no other "group" of people do these things Lorenzo.

Concern, Live Aid, Oxfam, Red Cross, Medecine sans Frontieres are all groups that help in the ways you have outlined. They have people from all differet religions and those without religion who help in many different ways. To simply dismiss them because it does not suit your argument is a most disrespectful and ignorant thing to do.

May I ask in what way you personally have "cured the sick, taught children, helped the weak, and fed the poor", monetary donations excluded (as you have no way of knowing exactly where your money went. Official charities are subject to audits by independent authorities, there are breakdowns of their expenditure. I'd love to see someone try that with the Catholic Church...). The Vatican takes €10 from each person visting, anybody know how many people visit the Vatican in a day? You'll get a real clear idea of how much money they make from just one of their many churches.
We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas.

I am only one. I can only do what one can do. But what one can do, I will do. -- John Seymour.
User avatar
Ebyss
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Ireland

Unread postby erl » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 18:44:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')rl, World Vision=CIA front.


Really? Maybe I should stop sending them money...

erl
erl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 580
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby lorenzo » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 20:11:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', 'I')'m just sticking my head back in here because I can't believe you think that no other "group" of people do these things Lorenzo.
Concern, Live Aid, Oxfam, Red Cross, Medecine sans Frontieres are all groups that help in the ways you have outlined.


I agree that these organizations technocratically "manage" some problems, but they do it in a very piecemeal way, according to very reductionistic agendas, and without offering any kind of broader vision.

Take Live Aid. That was the outcry of a few concerned citizens who were witnessing what was happening in Ethiopia in one certain moment in time.
All the while, the Churches in Ethiopia had been working there for ages, bettering the lives of as many people as humanly possible. No big media show, no "sudden" charity, no momentaneous, shortlived solidarity; but total, enduring and ever present commitment.

This is something totally different. I'm not saying these secular organizations aren't doing an excellent job, all I'm saying is that they don't have a broader vision, and that therefor they don't really address the roots of the problems they're fighting.

Medecins sans Frontieres does not question the causes of war, it does not question the ways to create a more peaceful world, it is not involved in curing the minds of suffering people. It is a technocratic, manegerial organization, a machine of modernity.

In that sense I feel very comfortable in saying that the Catholic Church is the only organization on the planet (aside from other religious organizations in other religions) who try to change the entire atmosphere in which these evil manifestations of man appear.

That's something totally different than sending food aid to a crisis zone.

Catholic priests live with their people all the time. They don't just show up when a disaster strikes them. They are there 24/7. The organizations you mention are not.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby erl » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 22:24:40

Lorenzo, I have to ask something.

I have read through this whole thread and paid close attention to your posts. I count only one time where you mention the word "Christian."

In your thoughts, is there a difference between Catholic and Christian?

Jesus talks about his followers calling themselves by his name. Why distinguish between Christian and Catholic?
erl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 580
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 22:59:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('erl', '
')
In your thoughts, is there a difference between Catholic and Christian?

Jesus talks about his followers calling themselves by his name. Why distinguish between Christian and Catholic?
One of the biggest questions in History - an awful lot of blood was shed over this issue. Lorenzo, your postings are powerful, passionate, well informed and articulate. I, too, would be interested in your take on this.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Unread postby lorenzo » Wed 06 Apr 2005, 21:20:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', 'T')he Vatican takes €10 from each person visting, anybody know how many people visit the Vatican in a day? You'll get a real clear idea of how much money they make from just one of their many churches.


The Vatican has a current deficit of €uro 8.5 million on a total budget of €uro 775 million. It is in debt. It does not stockpile treasures. It spends everything it has on bettering the world.

How dare you say that Catholic priests, who live in poverty among the poor, take money? I find that obscene. I take it you were joking.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby lorenzo » Wed 06 Apr 2005, 21:32:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('erl', '
')
In your thoughts, is there a difference between Catholic and Christian?

Jesus talks about his followers calling themselves by his name. Why distinguish between Christian and Catholic?
One of the biggest questions in History - an awful lot of blood was shed over this issue. Lorenzo, your postings are powerful, passionate, well informed and articulate. I, too, would be interested in your take on this.



The lord Jesus Christ said to Peter: you are the man who must form and guide a community, I give you the keys to the future of the Church, I incarnate myself in you. The Catholic Church is the incarnation of Jesus. That's crucial.

Christianity is per definition a religion of materiality and of the senses, embodied in a community. Hence the Church is not some mere "spiritual" institution or some exercise of the mind (as Protestants want it), it is embodied passion. Incarnate. Material.
Hence the entire chain of incarnations: the Communion, the Community, the Pope (incarnation of God on earth), the Sacraments, the Rituals and Liturgy, the Church buildings.

Really, this aesthetic dimension is absolutely crucial. Rituals are not some show, or some decoration, they are the crux of Christianity.

There is a direct line of material connectedness to Jesus, through the Pope as an institution.

This material connectedness is what mourners feel today, when they go to the Vatican to greet the Pope.

The protestant notion that all you need is a Bible which you can interpret by yourself as an individual (sola scriptura) is literally nonsensical. The doctrine would imply that you as a human being, are equal to God (because you are suggesting you can interpret the Bible all by yourself, correctly - this total access to the Divine knowledge implies you are God yourself -- that is unthinkable and obscene).

Jesus incarnated himself into his followers and urged them to form a community. Early Christianity was based on this pure materiality of the spirit and on the continuation of this incarnation (I must keep repeating the word). Why else would Christ have given his Body and his Blood, so literally?

Hence, Christianity is not some individualist gathering of dispassionate minds, forming a reading club.

I think this answers the question as to why the Catholic Church is the true continuation of Jesus's and God's spirit.

I have nothing against Protestants, but their religion lacks the sensual, ritual, collective, and warm materiality of Christ's passion and teachings. It was invented in cold, dispassionate Northern European countries, by grocers, traders and accountants, who mixed up bookkeeping with religion, and who use a quasi rational calculus and individualism over the real passion of Christ.

The Latin church on the contrary, comes from the South, keeps the true message of Christ alive, by being its incarnation. No mere "spirit" here, but material presence.

The difference between Protestantism and Catholicism is merely a matter of weather, climate, temperature and temperament.




I would illustrate this using a hypothetical example: if Protestants had a leader who was old and sick, they would "negotiate" his resignation, they would rationalize, talk, calculate - like business men really. They would make an intellectual transaction, like managers and decide that an old sick man cannot head their group. Catholics on the other hand accept their leader as he is, till the end, frail and decaying... Here you see the pure materiality, and passion of the Christ rising up again. That's the main difference between Protestants and Catholics.
Protestants are rationalist individualist managers, while Catholics are directly connected, materially, through bodies, rituals, places and practises, to Jesus. The Pope was old, frail, sick and he couldn't even speak - but he was still the Pope... not matter how decaying he was, his presence remains crucial, till the last breath.


I'm not sure whether I'm making myself clear, I'm not a theologian or a church scholar.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 06 Apr 2005, 21:59:46

The paintings of Jacopo Robusti (Tintoretto) would best exemplify this sensory aspect or incarnation of the spirit. The Italian Renaissance with its architecture and painting was suffused with such intense and grand spirit as a realization of this belief shared by devout Catholics. I don't think that I can accept that last line of your post (before the italicized portion). There was plenty going on besides a difference of climate and temperament, I think. Recall the corruption which disgusted Martin Luther. The characterization of the Protestants as 'grocers, traders and accountants' is simply a glib, and inadequate explanation.
Last edited by PenultimateManStanding on Wed 06 Apr 2005, 23:26:51, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Unread postby lorenzo » Wed 06 Apr 2005, 22:10:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'I') don't think that I can accept that last line of your post.


I was joking there, but I still think there's a climatic correlation between Protestantism and Catholicism.

In theory, one can live on Antarctica and be a Catholic. But someone who lives in Brazil, loving samba and sensuality, can never be a Protestant.

I truly believe that.





About the corruption at the time of Luther. Of course this existed. And of course it had to be talked through. But to turn such a critique into an entirely new religion, losing the entire essence of Christianity, makes no sense.

By the way, today, one could say the same of Protestants, with their hundreds of televangelists - turning religion into some marketing effort.

The Catholic Church still works on the idea of material presence: you go to a Church, you feel the Sacraments, you go and greet the body of the Pope; you have to be there and feel things in a community.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 06 Apr 2005, 22:33:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'I') don't think that I can accept that last line of your post.


I was joking there, but I still think there's a climatic correlation between Protestantism and Catholicism.

In theory, one can live on Antarctica and be a Catholic. But someone who lives in Brazil, loving samba and sensuality, can never be a Protestant.

I truly believe that.

The Catholic Church still works on the idea of material presence: you go to a Church, you feel the Sacraments, you go and greet the body of the Pope; you have to be there and feel things in a community.
OK, so that was just a throwaway line. No harm done. Regarding the idea of 'feeling' the Sacraments: I was married to a Catholic in a Catholic marriage ceremony. Have been to many Masses. I never felt anything like what you obviously feel. To me, the feeling inside the Church is stifling, oppressive, and depressive with the dead Jesus hanging there front and center. But then, I don't go to Protestant Churches either. Must be something you are raised with to work I guess. This morbid aspect is what I don't like and fail to see why Samba loving Brazilian sensualists should like it either.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Unread postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Wed 06 Apr 2005, 23:39:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he lord Jesus Christ said to Peter: ... I give you the keys to the future of the Church, I incarnate myself in you.


Where does the bible say that? Verses please.
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion
Top

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 06 Apr 2005, 23:59:55

Lorenzo, Several years ago I prayed that I would be able to feel and sense Catholicism, as it's experienced by Catholics. It actually did happen, I got images, the sense of antiquity, and a lot of the sensuous aesthetic impressions. This wasn't purely imaginary, and it was very interesting. I can understand the pull for some Catholics now and wouldn't dismiss it. It's a rich hauntingly beautiful experience. But isn't there a danger that the believer/experiencer in anything this sublime, will cross an important threshhold? The materiality and appreciation of mortification of the body of Christ, and the glorification of agony, at some point, seems to be a first cousin of sado masochism. Suffering itself becomes a kind of fetish. People in the grip of this morphogenetic field, for lack of better terms, would be terribly vulnerable to all kinds of abuse.

As far as the sensate materiality and direct linear link with God through intermediaries---and I'm not trying to be glib---this seems to be what dogs feel for their masters. And once you have established this relationship with a dog, you can beat him half to death and he'll return to you. We're not that different than animals in the face of any being or beings that we consider our superiors if we adopt a sensuous worshipful relationship with them. And is this a good thing? Perhaps a little rationalism has served humanity well. Yes, Northern Europeans could use a dose of deep meaning, but go too deep and it gets awfully dark.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 07 Apr 2005, 00:17:48

You have expressed my own very ambivalent feelings well, threadbear. i don't feel comfortable with bashing the faith or accepting it either. The veneration of the Mother Mary is a very endearing part of Catholicism; something you could get behind, Raphael. Your namesake, the painter Raphael created images of Mary and the baby Jesus that are the very epitome of goodness.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Unread postby lorenzo » Tue 12 Apr 2005, 09:39:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he lord Jesus Christ said to Peter: ... I give you the keys to the future of the Church, I incarnate myself in you.


Where does the bible say that? Verses please.


Matthew 16:18-19

And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. 19- I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron