I just don't get it.
First, let's set down a few givens:
1. Other countries will still have access to energy resources after a major economic crash.
2. Other countries produce things of value.
3. The U.S. produces mainly "green toilet paper."
If this is the case, then why would the U.S. falling into an economic depression hurt other countries? Most would argue that other countries need the U.S. to buy their stuff. This makes no sense whatsoever. What would happen if countries started selling their stuff to THEIR OWN PEOPLE? Wouldn't that actually make the citizens of those countries materially wealthier? But then you might say, the citizens of those countries don't have the money to buy all of that stuff. Well, why don't they? Surely they've earned it through their labor, no? Perhaps the labourers aren't being paid enough to buy their own goods? Perhaps those countries would just need some liquidity injected into their economies?
Another theoretical question: if those countries went into "gift" economies, and gifted goods within each country freely, with perhaps a small tax exacted from each person in the country to pay for oil and resource purchases from other countries, would that not solve the problem?
I just can't get my head around this. Of course, I'm not an economics professor, either, so maybe some others here could provide some insight.







