Yesterday on my way down to the airport I was listened to a pod cast interview with Daniel R. Amerman on Credit Default Swaps/
link , and had one of them eureka moments; why not raise taxes to fix the system!!!!
Yeah I know it might sound counterintuitive increase taxes at a time when there is an economic downturn, but if ya read on it might make sense...
We know "credit default swaps" otherwise known as CDS contracts have been widely used by hedge funds and others to speculate on the viability of banks, other financial institutions such as brokerage houses, and auto manufactures.
These bets on various companies were not made on any regulated exchange and no one knows the exact size of the problem; much like we don't know the actual oil reserves in the ground in secretive nation states like Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc.
Daniel Amerman mentioned in the interview "Credit default swaps" are similar to homeowners insurance, because the buyer pays a premium and, in return, receives a sum of money if a specified event occurs. However, unlike homeowners insurance the buyer of a CDS contract does not need to own the underlying security, in fact the buyer does not even have to suffer a loss from the default event.
I've read there might be as much as 70 trillion in CDS betting slips that will never be able to be paid off and this is why Warren Buffett called these financial derivatives financial weapons of mass destruction. Basically the uncertainty caused by credit default swaps is having a paralyzing effect on the credit markets and the real economy.
So I was wondering why can't the knuckheads in the US congress use their power to make tax laws, to in effect make CDS contracts worthless by imposing a 100% tax on CDS profits (with a three day tax settlement period) on owners of CDS contracts who do not own the underlying security. A well crafted rule like this would remove much of the uncertainty in the market and not penalize owners of of CDS contracts who own the underlying security.
Also with the $hitheads from Detroit:
link asking for $25 billion to save the big three auto makers and justify the fleet of gulfstreams, I also thought wouldn't this be the right time to increase taxes on gasoline say 20 cents a year for the next ten years and use the funds to retool and make the US auto industry more completive?
This way we as a nation don't add more debt for future generations by "loaning" the auto companies some money (that might not get paid back) so they can continue the downward business as usual trend.
Also by increasing prices at the pump with targeted taxes for a troubled sector in the US economy, US consumers will become conditioned to use a non renewable resource more efficiently.
So now that I've figured out how to fix the US economy by increasing taxes, I think I deserve 100 hours blocktime in airforce one by president elect Obama, same goes for the auto companies they should each give me 100 hours blocktime in a gulfstream 550, or at the very least I'd like an ig-nobel prize in economics.
link
Seriously though, since I'm not a trained lawyer or a formally educated economist what obstacles and downsides do ya all think would there be to using tax laws to help out the auto industry and indirectly regulate an unregulated market in "Credit default swaps?"