Disclaimer, I don't understand all the details either, except the macro picture, which is, the banks fear a depression (drop in asset values). They fear this because when assets go bad, it means their loans go bad, and for businesses that invested in assets at current prices, they lose too. Deflation means an economy isn't growing. So, they will try to "inflate" or jump start the economy by printing money. The ultimate problem is trying to jump start an economy by printing money without hyperinflating an economy, which destroys the money.
In the end, I think the aftermath of a credit expansion will be one of two evils, either depression or hyperinflation. According to Ludwig Von Mises, "Depression is the aftermath of credit expansion."
Von Mises Quotes
Bottom line, literally trillions in bad debts have to be either written off (depression) or repaid (hyperinflation of the currency). Unfortunately, instead of letting private institutions fail, our gov't and most world gov'ts have opted to take these bad debts on the books of the gov't, namely, Fannie and Freddie to mention the big two. So, if they fail, failure means failure of our gov't and dollar.
My fear is this, can we grow our way out of the aftermath? Growth requires energy to produce goods. As most of us believe here, we are closely approaching PO. The IEA says that existing fields are in decline at about 4% per year, maybe a little more, and that just to maintain current production it will take massive investment, but the problem is, we're broke. So, will we find ourselves in this whirlpool of a deflating economy and decreasing oil production at the same time? The mega projects data used to say that all the new big discoveries would be online by 2010, with nothing significant after that. If true, that means by 2010 we should start seeing a serious decline in world oil production if the IEA is correct in its projection of a 4% decline in existing fields.
Rockman, please weigh in here.