Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE International Energy Agency (IEA) Thread pt 2 (merged) A

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

Re: IEA's World Energy Report 2008

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Thu 13 Nov 2008, 16:05:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', 'T')he big questions seem to be how much will world demand drop and how much oil will OPEC cut to keep prices up?


I'm starting to form the thought that if prices crater low enough and long enough, something else will solve the price problem for them (producers/exporters). If the price stays down long enough and they cannot control it with cuts, then the possible political or social problems brought on by the lower prices in these places will cause unforseen events which push prices right back up.

Longer term these lower prices will impact production and we'll move back towards balance at some point. Hopefully we can do it without a minor nuclear conflagaration or some terrorist group sinking a few tankers in the straights of Hormuz.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: IEA's World Energy Report 2008

Unread postby seahorse2 » Thu 13 Nov 2008, 16:26:49

Even if the IEA reserve figures are right, it doesn't matter. The opinion that we have enough reserves to get us to 2030 rest on one big ASSUMPTION which is, the world will make the investments to get at the new oil reserves. The problem with this ASSUMPTION is we know in fact, its not true, bc when oil was at $140 a barrel the necessary investment wasn't being made and already, with the price of oil crashing, there are numerous reports that projects are being delayed and or canceled.

Saudi may cancel plans due to financial crisis:

http://malaysia.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20081108/tbs-aramco-refineries-total-7318940.html]Saudi

Oilsands delay due to financial crisis:

http://royaldutchshellplc.com/category/oil-sands/]Oilsands delay

Financial crisis hits oil investment"

http://www.forbes.com/afxnewslimited/feeds/afx/2008/11/06/afx5659317.html
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: IEA's World Energy Report 2008

Unread postby Twilight » Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:03:19

Lack of resources, lack of investment and lack of access by investment amount to the same thing in the end. Pick your poison, the effects are literally no different. So claiming that there is no shortage of supply given adequate future investment penetrating hitherto closed markets is just going round in a circle.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: IEA's World Energy Report 2008

Unread postby VMarcHart » Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:07:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', '.')..the possible political or social problems brought on by the lower [oil] prices in these places will cause unforseen events which push prices right back up.
Like where and what type of events, please? Thanks.
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California

Re: IEA doesn't see peak oil...

Unread postby smiley » Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:12:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Neither the IEA or any other group has the data necessary to answer the simple question: how much proven oil is in the ground today.


That is not necessarely true. They don't have the exact numbers, but they should realise that there are huge downward uncertainties in the reporting of some of the "proven"reserves. And if they are honest they should adress those fears in their outlook.

US congress for instance order Mexico a few years back to reasses one of their basins (I believe it was Chicontepec) because they simply did not believe the numbers that Mexico were putting out. As a result the reserve numbers were significantly lowered.

If US congress can figure these things out so can the IEA.

I also cannot see how they are politically bound, because none of the OPEC countries are members of the IEA. So in principle there is nothing holding them back unless the member OECD countries are warning them not to go headbutting with the middle-east.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: IEA's World Energy Report 2008

Unread postby sjn » Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:25:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', '.')..the possible political or social problems brought on by the lower [oil] prices in these places will cause unforseen events which push prices right back up.
Like where and what type of events, please? Thanks.

Martial law in Russia? Civil war in Nigeria? Revolution in Saudi Arabia?
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Re: IEA doesn't see peak oil...

Unread postby Twilight » Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:48:02

The IEA has a soft political colour, its origin lies in the 1973 oil shock and the need to mitigate further disruptions of that sort, and it is basically an OECD club.

However, it is no different to any other official organisation in that it does not have the luxury of staking its reputation on unprovable assertions. Since it cannot prove that ME Gulf reserves were inflated in the 80s, or by how much, it is not going to go out on a limb and publicly use the possibility in its planning assumptions. Not without a smoking gun in the form of documents and names or a further sea change in sentiment.

I see a similar phenomenon in the LCPD, no-one in utilities would openly voice the belief that the government will repudiate an EU directive, so it lives on in projections as one of those absurdities that screws up the figures and periodically generates dumb headlines. Circumstance compels scepticism, but you cannot run with it.

The problem with putting yourself in that position is if you are wrong about just one part of it, you lose a lot of face and step on the toes of people who probably have more pull than you. Maybe there is a rabbit in the hat, probably not what we really need, but enough to cause severe embarrassment if someone tries to call the bluff. And that is why you cannot expect investigative journalism to come out of official bodies. All we can do is what we already do, which is question the validity of the underlying assumptions. The authors are not at liberty.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: IEA's World Energy Report 2008

Unread postby seahorse » Thu 13 Nov 2008, 21:48:46

CFR sees lack of oil investment due to price drop, which, if the IEA is right, means we will not be stemming the decline in existing fields.

CFR
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: IEA's World Energy Report 2008

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:20:47

As SJN pointed out there are a host of problems just boiling below the surface right now in many of the producer nations. Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, etc. All have very precarious balancing acts going on right now and I would expect that with large economic downturns in any of those places you could see some serious issues which may directly affect production.

Simple speculation but the trends will not go in the right direction with the global situation and lowering oil prices IMHO.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: IEA doesn't see peak oil...

Unread postby TheDude » Fri 14 Nov 2008, 02:30:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'N')either the IEA or any other group has the data necessary to answer the simple question: how much proven oil is in the ground today.


They claim to have production figures for all supergiant fields, though, apparently using IHS data. How can this be if KSA etc. data is under wraps? I keep asking this but no one has an answer.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: International Energy Agency: World Energy Outlook

Unread postby CarlosFerreira » Sun 16 Nov 2008, 13:17:25

Just read the executive summary; the perspectives are not good. The IEA is doing what it has to do, telling everyone that peak oil isn't predicted until 2030, BUT that investment is needed to keep up with demand. They're asking for 26 trillions investment to do it (which necessarily will increase the marginal cost of barrel) and saying that most expected production will come from OPEC countries (which means it comes from a cartel).

So, price is going through the roof, we just don't know when. Brace yourselves, buy that bicycle now.
Environmental News and Clippings:
http://www.google.co.uk/reader/shared/1 ... 4898696533
Environmental Economics and Systems
http://enviroecon.wordpress.com/
CarlosFerreira
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Canterbury, UK

Re: International Energy Agency: World Energy Outlook

Unread postby Commanding_Heights » Sun 16 Nov 2008, 14:02:38

Dang :( I clicked on this thread (seeing the OP) thinking He's Back!, let the arguments begin!
User avatar
Commanding_Heights
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu 09 Nov 2006, 04:00:00

Re: IEA's World Energy Report 2008

Unread postby yesplease » Sun 16 Nov 2008, 16:03:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', 'I')'m starting to form the thought that if prices crater low enough and long enough, something else will solve the price problem for them (producers/exporters). If the price stays down long enough and they cannot control it with cuts, then the possible political or social problems brought on by the lower prices in these places will cause unforseen events which push prices right back up.

Longer term these lower prices will impact production and we'll move back towards balance at some point. Hopefully we can do it without a minor nuclear conflagaration or some terrorist group sinking a few tankers in the straights of Hormuz.
The only problem w/ the idea of local problems instigating production cuts is that it runs contrary to the welfare of those who are producing. In other words, $50-60/bbl, while less than half of the recent maximum, is two to three times what it was during the previous couple decades and is a fair sight better than $50-60/bbl multiplied by zero production. I think production cuts are the safest way to go overall, although people don't have to behave rationally so we could see a rise in disruptions. That's something that'd be very interesting to watch/compare over the next five plus years compared to the past five plus years so we could see if there is any significant difference. I bet someone has already done that when looking at the 70s/80s price spike, but Ihaveno clue where to look for it.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IEA doesn't see peak oil...

Unread postby KevO » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 10:58:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', '"')World oil supply is projected to rise to 106 million barrels a day in 2030 from 84 million in 2007, with the bulk of the increase expected to come from members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries."

84 million in 2007.

106 million in 2030.

World oil production has been on a plateau for almost 4 years.
Who here believes that with the global economic climate we are currently experiencing the needed production can or will happen?


Lets be more current and face reality.
There ae only two main ways that peak oil would be a none starter and I mean ever.
1/ a 40%+ death toll from something like bird flu or
2/ a worldwide recession that will never end

we have enetered number 2. Peak oil is now a more optimistic wish.

The only thing that put a halt to the last big one in the 20's and 30's ( and this time it's far, far worse) was WW2 so ok
3/ WW3
KevO
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT USA
Top

IEA nightmare scenario coming true

Unread postby seahorse2 » Tue 09 Dec 2008, 18:55:11

The IEA's latest report said existing fields are declining at over 6% per year, up to 9% a year if not maintained. It said that just to run steady, maintain a plateau, the world needed to keep finding, drilling and producing lots of new oil.

The problem is, with this economic downturn, the world is not looking for and drilling new oil. Thus, the problem arises that production will soon be decreasing by 6-9% per year without investment. My fear is that this current depression leads to a vicious race to the bottom. That lack of investment leads to ever decreasing oil production, further killing demand, further leading to lack of investment, further killing world GDP. The world system, as we know it, cannot survive if oil production decreases at the rate of 6% per year. I hope this simple outlook is wrong.

Evidence reported today out of Iran that the worse case scenario is unfolding.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Iran's Oil Output May Fall 25%; Exports May Cease, FACTS Says By Dinakar Sethuraman:
Dec. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Iran, the second-largest crude producer in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, may reduce output by as much as 25 percent and cease exports because of ageing fields and a lack of foreign investment.

Crude oil production may fall to as much as 3 million barrels a day by 2015 from 4.02 million last year and the country may halt exports, pending the approval of refining projects, after shipping about 2.3 million this year overseas, Singapore-based Facts Global Energy said in a report today. Iran has plans to produce 4.5 million by 2010 and 5 million after 2015.

``Without a major change in policy and investment climate in Iran, crude oil production and exports are projected to decline drastically in the future,'' analyst Vijay Mukherji said in the report e-mailed today. ``The incremental supply that Iran is promising to the world will simply not be available.''

Iran faces the prospects of an 8 percent annual decline in production of as much as 700,000 barrels a day because of a lack of investment and old technology. Sanctions by western nations and a tight credit market because of the global financial crisis have crimped financing for Iranian projects while a 70 percent decline in crude oil prices since July cuts investments.

The Middle Eastern nation may partner companies including China Petrochemical Corp., also known as Sinopec Group, StatoilHydro ASA and Oil & Natural Gas Corp. to develop new projects in areas such as Anaran, Azadegan, Yadavaran, Jofeir and Farsi, the report said.

Sinopec Group: National Iranian Oil Co.'s contract with Sinopec Group for Yadavaran has a lower payback period and a higher return of 14.98 percent, a premium of as much as 3 percent compared with older contracts, reflecting Iran's push to secure foreign investment, the report said.

"We project that new field development projects will somewhat help in compensating the loss from natural declines in mature fields, but in our view, unless current political and financial impediments facing the oil industry are removed we do not envision production exceeding 4 million barrels a day,'' the report said.

Iran extracts as little as 20 percent of the oil from the ground because of lack of adequate projects to enhance oil recovery by injecting natural gas into the ground, the report said.

Iran may add more than 450,000 barrels a day of crude distillation capacity between 2008 and 2015 through expansions and upgrades at refineries in Bandar Abbas, Arak, Lavan, Tabriz, Isfahan, and Shiraz, the report said.

Crude oil exports may drop to about 1 million barrels a day by 2015, and if an additional 800,000 to 1 million barrels of refining expansions are approved, crude exports could :decline to almost nothing,'' the report said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Dinakar Sethuraman in Singapore at dinakar@bloomberg.net.
Updated: Dec 9, 2008 01:44 EST Bloomberg
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IEA nightmare scenario coming true

Unread postby dukey » Tue 09 Dec 2008, 19:10:47

Are the tar sands even viable at $40/barrel? that's a million barrels a day gone ..
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: IEA nightmare scenario coming true

Unread postby Tanada » Tue 09 Dec 2008, 19:57:31

I disagree, there is no recorded proof that demand destruction has ever been sustained for more than a year or two and even if we destroyed 10 Mbbl/d of demand it would not take more than a few short years for 9% depletion rates to catch up to that level of production, which in turn drives prices back in the other direction, encourages investment and slows declines even if it doesn't cause things to go back up.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: IEA nightmare scenario coming true

Unread postby MD » Tue 09 Dec 2008, 20:02:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'I') disagree, there is no recorded proof that demand destruction has ever been sustained for more than a year or two and even if we destroyed 10 Mbbl/d of demand it would not take more than a few short years for 9% depletion rates to catch up to that level of production, which in turn drives prices back in the other direction, encourages investment and slows declines even if it doesn't cause things to go back up.


Yes but it's the system itself that is broken/breaking-in-progress. The whole model is predicated on ever increasing supply of the cheap stuff. Now that it's in decline, the system has to break and new models must form before we can truly move forward.

Instead of moving forward though, we are clinging ever more tenaciously to the broken models. It's not looking good at all. $1.00 gasoline be damned. It's just a bounce.
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball
Top

Re: IEA nightmare scenario coming true

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 09 Dec 2008, 21:01:51

It all depends on how deep and how long the recession is. If we have a global depression thats lasts 10+ years, then we'll see continued demand destruction and deflationary pressure on oil prices for 10 years.......
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: IEA nightmare scenario coming true

Unread postby vision-master » Tue 09 Dec 2008, 21:14:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Hopi Survival Kit - Chapter 6 - Prophecies Past and Present - Page 207/ 208.

Hopi Elders Quote:

Quote:
Let us take a look into the future through the eyes of our prophets. They say that along the way the industrialized world will have certain problems. Throughout the world people will be uncomfortable because of the changing times. The worldly woes people will be going through. People will have to make adjustments to fit themselves into new life styles and environments.

The industrialized nations will become careless in getting more of the resources they need out of the earth, oil, coal, etc. Believing all these things will last forever. Soon natural resources will be depleted. Fuel shortages will occur; industrial machinery will come to a standstill. The machinery used for planting, harvesting and transport will become useless. The white man (Bahanna) with all his intelligence and technology will not be able to repair the damage.

Now let us review our knowledge briefly, the centuries old prophecies which warned us what would happen when we forgot the principles of right and wrong in our behavior. We will see extraordinary events in Nature and Earth, including mankind: because modern man ignores the wisdom of ancient culture and religion. Modern man looks upon old wisdom and knowledge as dead, useless and no longer respected.

Modern man began to depend on the money system and no longer Mother Earth for food. According to prophecy when this happens Mother Earth will hide the nourishment which she provides because of the view that ancient food is poor man’s food.

When all food disappears modern man will try to correct his mistake, the conditions he caused upon the earth through his inventions. He will try to achieve some kind of method to heal the wound, but this will not be possible when we reach the point of no return.

Only through peace the survival of mankind and our planet Earth is possible. Only if we, the human race, are willing to change.

vision-master
 
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron