Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE International Energy Agency (IEA) Thread pt 2 (merged) A

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

Re: IEA's World Energy Report 2008

Postby ReverseEngineer » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 05:59:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'I')sn't. Conservation and rationing could save millions of barrels. Big spanner in the works of course is the economic displacement that occurs when so much discretionary driving ends; example I use with people is the zitfarms selling corn dogs in a mall's food mart. Who's going to drive to malls anymore, much less spend excess money while they're there? Buses go to these places as well but the added time in using MT will deter those who have little time to spare owing to family obligations and the like. People will pull through but so much service economy employment will fizzle out; this recession is chewing that up already with oil at major lows.


Much more than the absolute DISAPPEARANCE of oil off the face of the earth, the BIGGER question we face is the Economic Dislocation resulting from the fact that Oil is not a CHEAP source of energy anymore. The banking system and monetary system depended on ever expanding debt that could be paid off wit growth off CHEAP oil, which no longer exists. Its this crash which threatesn us much more directly than an absolute disappearance of Oil from the face of the earth, which won't happen really for years, especialy taking into account demand destruction and die off.

Although a monetary system breakdown could in theory empty the supermarket shelves in a matter of weeks, the fact is the productive capacity and the actual food in storage lasts much longer than that for the society at large. Even assuming say a 10% one year reduction in the overall harvest, Americans probably consume 20% more food than they need, explaining of course the rampant obesity of the population. I honestly do not think it would be that hard to dump food production off the trade grid and run this particular portion of society socialistically through a food credits program. If the will is to do that, the productive capacity is there to do it, without any input from foreign sources of money.

The problem I see is a lack of consenssus and true understanding of the problems and the reasons for them; no true understanding i most people of the nature of banking and of the inherent greed and flaws in the capitalist system and market economy. That lack of understanding is rampant on the board here, it goes to the concepts of wealth and ownership which people here educated under these ideas simply cannot let go of. Unless we can GET them to understand the nature of their greed and the fundamental fallacy of living at the expense of another, then we cannot repair the system, though it is reperable in theory. Its the greedy who prevent that from happening, its those who believe that one person can and should live at the expense of another. That is FUNDAMENTAL EVIL, and it must be exterminated as a thought process. It is the though process of a corrupt and evil mind. Not that hard to do either, if you have the will as a community to do so. The poor always outnumber the rich by orders of magnitude. Just a matter of bringing them together to fight for the common good. Not an easy task, but always possible when things get bad enough and the rich are no longer rich enough to buy the soldiers and keep the slaves fed.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

IEA World Energy Outlook Released (we're so screwed)

Postby sirrom » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 06:49:02

http://www.iea.org/Textbase/npsum/WEO2008SUM.pdf

lets start the checking it over

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he prospect of accelerating declines in production at individual oilfields is adding to these uncertainties. The findings of an unprecedented field-by-field analysis of the historical production trends of 800 oilfields indicate that decline rates are likely to rise significantly in the long term, from an average of 6.7% today to 8.6% in 2030. “Despite all the attention that is given to demand growth, decline rates are actually a far more important determinant of investment needs. Even if oil demand was to remain flat to 2030, 45 mb/d of gross capacity – roughly four times the current capacity of Saudi Arabia – would need to be built by 2030 just to offset the effect of oilfield decline”, Mr. Tanaka added.


check out page 7 and 8.
page 8 admits conventional crude oil production has peaked.

http://www.iea.org/weo/key_graphs_08/WE ... Graphs.pdf


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Reference Scenario projections call for cumulative investment of over
$26 trillion (in year-2007 dollars) in 2007-2030, over $4 trillion more than posited
in WEO-2007.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he projected increase in global oil output hinges on adequate and timely
investment. Some 64 mb/d of additional gross capacity — the equivalent of almost
six times that of Saudi Arabia today — needs to be brought on stream between
2007 and 2030
.

This is if oil demand keeps rising.

And how much oil is remaining?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he world’s total endowment of oil is large enough to support the projected rise in
production beyond 2030 in the Reference Scenario. Estimates of remaining proven
reserves of oil and NGLs range from about 1.2 to 1.3 trillion barrels (including about
0.2 trillion barrels of non-conventional oil). They have almost doubled since 1980. This
is enough to supply the world with oil for over 40 years at current rates of consumption.
Though most of the increase in reserves has come from revisions made in the 1980s in
OPEC countries rather than from new discoveries
,


Summary:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he energy future will be very different
For all the uncertainties highlighted in this report, we can be certain that the
energy world will look a lot different in 2030 than it does today. The world energy
system will be transformed, but not necessarily in the way we would like to see. We
can be confident of some of the trends highlighted in this report: the growing weight
of China, India, the Middle East and other non-OECD regions in energy markets and in
CO 2 emissions; the rapidly increasing dominance of national oil companies; and the
emergence of low-carbon energy technologies. And while market imbalances could
temporarily cause prices to fall back, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the era
of cheap oil is over
. But many of the key policy drivers (not to mention other, external
factors) remain in doubt. It is within the power of all governments, of producing and
consuming countries alike, acting alone or together, to steer the world towards a
cleaner, cleverer and more competitive energy system. Time is running out and the time
to act is now.
Last edited by sirrom on Wed 12 Nov 2008, 10:11:12, edited 6 times in total.
what did YOU do in the eco-war?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayz1SK4KbX4
User avatar
sirrom
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu 08 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: England
Top

Re: IEA World Energy Outlook Released (we're so screwed)

Postby ZombieMalthus » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 07:03:23

Anyone have a history of oil projection quotes? Like:

"We have enough oil to last 500 years..."

"We have enough oil to last 200 years..."

"We have enough oil to last 100 years..."
User avatar
ZombieMalthus
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed 14 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: IEA World Energy Outlook Released (we're so screwed)

Postby Daniel_Plainview » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 07:11:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sirrom', '
')
check out page 7 and 8.
page 8 admits conventional crude oil production has peaked.

http://www.iea.org/weo/key_graphs_08/WE ... Graphs.pdf


According to page 8, crude oil from current fields peaked around 2008.
User avatar
Daniel_Plainview
Prognosticator
Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Tue 06 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: 7035 Hollis ... Near the Observatory ... Just down the way, tucked back in the small woods
Top

Re: IEA's World Energy Report 2008

Postby SweetSmellofMoney » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 07:39:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SweetSmellofMoney', 'I') suppose it really is kind of irrelevant considering that within a 5 year time frame crude from the most part will have become obsolete as a fuel source.


I agree. Most of us will be walking. :razz:

By 2013 PHEV production may be up to 500k units/year, assuming GE is still solvent to produce the Volt. In the US alone you have 95 million solo driving commuters to provide for; Prius sales are down 4.3% this year. Automakers aren't going to crank out 20 million PHEVs for 5 years in the US, for one thing max auto sales total have never exceeded 18 million in a year. 2008 looks to be 13-14 million.



LOL!

Unfortunately, what you see is what you get!

Qatar says no Nov, Dec crude cuts to 2 Asian lifters
Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:30am GMT Email | Print | Share| Single Page | Recommend (0) [-] Text [+] Market News
STOCKS NEWS EUROPE-Amec higher on update; Seymour upgrades
STOCKS NEWS EUROPE-Prisa falls on Digital+ sale delay fears
STOCKS NEWS EUROPE-Dimension Data up after preliminary results
More Business & Investing News... TOKYO, Nov 12 (Reuters) - Qatar has told at least two term customers in Asia that it would not cut its crude oil supplies to them for November and December, two sources with term lifters said on Wednesday.

This comes after Qatar Energy Minister Abdullah al-Attiyah told Reuters last week that the country has cut crude oil exports to Asia by about 40,000 barrels per day from this month in line with OPEC's agreement to curb output by 5 percent. [ID:nSP360785] (Reporting by James Topham)


Market demand continues to wane, making matters all the better we not only have the Air Car coming on line we have seen TTM moving production into full gear.

Becareful what you wish for!

LOL!
User avatar
SweetSmellofMoney
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat 25 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IEA's World Energy Report 2008

Postby Carlhole » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 09:18:13

[url=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/iea-doesnt-see-peak-oil/story.aspx?guid={C844CC20-F5BC-4627-987A-7CBF7FE50923}]MarketWatch: IEA doesn't see peak oil by 2030[/url]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')ONDON (MarketWatch) -- The International Energy Agency on Wednesday dismissed fears about peak oil, but the group said under-investment could lead to production troubles.
The IEA published the full report on its world energy outlook after releasing a summary last week.
"Although global oil production is not expected to peak before 2030, conventional crude-oil production is projected to level off toward the end of the projection period," it said.
Canadian oil sands, extra heavy oil, gas-to-liquids and coal-to-liquids will have to make up the difference.
But it warned that OPEC countries will need to step up their investment campaign...
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: IEA World Energy Outlook Released (we're so screwed)

Postby RdSnt » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 09:37:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sirrom', '
')
Though most of the increase in reserves has come from revisions made in the 1980s in
OPEC countries rather than from new discoveries
,

[/quote]

I find the inclusion of this little statement to be most striking. I would say it is a subtle but significant admission that the Opec tallies are not to be trusted.
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: IEA World Energy Outlook Released (we're so screwed)

Postby MrMambo » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 09:38:42

About the executive summary:

The language is serious... dramatic even. They say the path we are on is "patently unsustainable" They say in the first section that "nothing short of an energy revolution is needed".

They go on to revise future price projection upward, perhaps more dramatically than they have every done.

But it doesn't go long before they dig up their good old optimism again. They expect opec reserves (we all know how solid those reserve numbers are) to be plentiful enough to help increase production by huge amounts. Saudi-Arabia is supposed to be producing 15 mbl/day in 2030.

But then after much rather optimistic talk about how much more production of oil and gass we can expect until 2030 they get into the decline rates:

This is where the picture is at a mismatch. They state that "natural" decline rates (production decline without further investment) for oil production is at 9% globally ... This means that without investments we get to half the production in less than 8 years.When you factor in investment they say the decline rate is at 6,7% globally... That will result in a halving of the production in slightly over 10 years. so in 2018 we have half of what we have today and actually they indicate that it will be worse since they expect decline rates to accellerate.

So all that increase they are talking about is to magically appear from a combination of yet to be deveoloped and new fields(the bulk of the increase accordring to their growth projection graph) + non-crude sources such as gass to liquids, unconventional oil and EOR. Also the undeveloped but discovered fields is supposed to provide most of the increase during the 2008-2030 period.

If you belive this graph it seems like IEA thinks that we have discovered fields today that will provide something like 20 mb/day around 2020. (in little over 10 years).... In other words.. The world sits on confirmed oil-field disvoreries that in 10 years time will be able to produce more than two times what Saudia-Arabia produces today...

That really sounds sort of easy... I don't have the full report but I'm very curious about where all those undeveloped fields that could be put rapidly in production actually resides. They are certainly not in Norway where I live where known undeveloped fields are really tiny.

And as Matthew Simmons often point out, even if we put all the money in the world on the table to increase drilling and building production rigs there isn't enough drills and production units available today. Many drills are so old they risk being useless within the next few years. Building enough new production rigs to get to that extra 20 mbl/day of added production might not even be remotely possible.

The executive summary says that OPEC countries can provide most of the production increase we need if they wish to do so.

My impression after looking through the summary of the report is that they are starting to admit something is dramatically wrong, but that they still try to sugarcoat their findings with unrealistic production growth projections.
Last edited by MrMambo on Wed 12 Nov 2008, 12:12:39, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
MrMambo
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: IEA World Energy Outlook 2008

Postby shortonsense » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 09:54:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrMambo', 'T')he report will be available at their website today, either for money or for free: link

Heres the executive summary: link Page 5, halfway down: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('IEA REPORT SAYS', '
')The world is not running short of oil or gas just yet.The world’s total endowment of oil is large enough to support the projected rise in production beyond 2030 in the Reference Scenario.

So much for this being a problem from their point of view I guess, in regards to their reference scenario, which appears to mean some level of investment which I suppose we can argue over.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IEA World Energy Outlook 2008

Postby ColossalContrarian » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 09:58:12

ColossalContrarian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1374
Joined: Tue 20 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: IEA's World Energy Report 2008

Postby VMarcHart » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 10:05:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SweetSmellofMoney', '.')..within a 5 year time frame crude for the most part will have become obsolete as a fuel source.

...crude will continue to trend lower as demand and fears of production cuts lead technologies to develop other means of alternative energy ie... Wind, Solar, Hydro etc...
Could you please demonstrate how, in 5 years, we'll replace and/or retrofit the 300 million registered vehicles in the U.S. currently running on oil? Thanks!
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California
Top

IEA doesn't see peak oil...

Postby frankthetank » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 10:13:42

until 2030...

This is on front page of Marketwatch right now...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he International Energy Agency on Wednesday dismissed fears about peak oil, but the group said under-investment could lead to production troubles.
The IEA published the full report on its world energy outlook after releasing a summary last week.
"Although global oil production is not expected to peak before 2030, conventional crude-oil production is projected to level off toward the end of the projection period," it said.
Canadian oil sands, extra heavy oil, gas-to-liquids and coal-to-liquids will have to make up the difference.
But it warned that OPEC countries will need to step up their investment campaign.
Some 64 million barrels of oil equivalent a day of additional gross capacity, the equivalent of six times the amount Saudi Arabia produces today, must be brought on stream from 2007 to 2030, with about half needed by 2015.
"Capacity additions from current projects tail off after 2010," the Paris-based agency said. "This largely reflects the upstream development cycle: Many new projects will undoubtedly be sanctioned in the near term as oil companies complete existing projects and move on to new ones. But the gap now evident between what is currently being built and what will be needed to keep pace with demand is set to widen sharply after 2010."
In all, it's estimating $26 trillion in cumulative investment between 2007 and 2030.

As it said last week, the IEA expects world primary-energy demand to grow an average of 1.6% per year between 2006 and 2030, an increase of 45%.
World oil supply is projected to rise to 106 million barrels a day in 2030 from 84 million in 2007, with the bulk of the increase expected to come from members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries


Go back to sleep...sheep!

This report smells worse then my underpants...

[url=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/IEA-doesnt-see-peak-oil/story.aspx?guid={C844CC20-F5BC-4627-987A-7CBF7FE50923}]LINK[/url]
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI
Top

Re: IEA World Energy Outlook 2008

Postby mos6507 » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 10:41:10

They said total recoverable oil at 3.5 trillion barrels. That runs counter to the conventional ~2 trilliion barrels. It seems like they pulled this figure out of their ass in order to push the theoretical peak far enough in the future so as not to panic anyone. And on the one hand they are crying out for investment (DRILL BABY DRILL) and on the other they have suddenly become global warming converts. So it is damn confusing, which seems to point towards political meddling in spinning this report for strategic public consumption.

This kind of obfuscation may fly for now, but it will fall away whenever Saudi Arabia goes into a true decline.
mos6507
 

Re: IEA World Energy Outlook 2008

Postby Daniel_Plainview » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 10:48:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'T')hey said total recoverable oil at 3.5 trillion barrels. That runs counter to the conventional ~2 trilliion barrels. It seems like they pulled this figure out of their ass in order to push the theoretical peak far enough in the future so as not to panic anyone.


In addition to the 2 trillion barrels of known total recoverable oil, you need to add 1.5 T bbls that the abiotic oil fairy will produce between now and 2030. :lol:
User avatar
Daniel_Plainview
Prognosticator
Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Tue 06 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: 7035 Hollis ... Near the Observatory ... Just down the way, tucked back in the small woods
Top

Re: IEA World Energy Outlook Released (we're so screwed)

Postby mos6507 » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 10:55:23

It's surgarcoating to us but there is enough alarming language in it that joe sixpack would probably be concerned. Concerned enough to stop driving the Hummer when gas is currently so cheap? Probably not.
mos6507
 

Re: IEA doesn't see peak oil...

Postby RSFB » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 11:12:03

IEA is saying some much needed things though:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 't')rends call for energy supply investment of $26.3 trillion to 2030, or more than $1 trillion a year, but it noted that tight credit conditions could delay spending.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')While the situation facing the world is critical, it is vital we keep our eye on the medium to long term target of a sustainable energy future,"

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')anaka said that "while market imbalances will feed instability, the era of cheap oil is over."

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')owever, Tanaka said it was "far from certain" those companies would be willing to make the necessary investment themselves or to attract sufficient capital to keep up the necessary pace of investment."
User avatar
RSFB
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 309
Joined: Sun 03 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IEA World Energy Outlook 2008

Postby JustaGirl » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 11:27:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'T')hey said total recoverable oil at 3.5 trillion barrels. That runs counter to the conventional ~2 trilliion barrels. It seems like they pulled this figure out of their ass in order to push the theoretical peak far enough in the future so as not to panic anyone.


Nah, sounds about right. From reading parts of their report they are counting coal-to-liquids, NG-to-liquids & every unconventional in between :-D
JustaGirl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed 09 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Petoria
Top

Re: IEA doesn't see peak oil...

Postby dohboi » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 12:46:12

Wasn't there just a leek last week from an IEA report to the Financial Times that said they projected decline rates from existing fields up from 6 to 9 percent?

When even these industry promoters are saying things like "the age of cheap oil is over," no one should now doubt it. And if this is true, it makes no sense to say that peak is 22 years out. Why would an age of cheap oil end 22 years before geological peak? (Really more like 30+ years, since oil started its exponential price growth around 1998.)
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: IEA World Energy Outlook Released (we're so screwed)

Postby virgincrude » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 13:05:53

I think it's pretty freakin significant when Reuters (UK) use the Peak term and actually summarise thus:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ON-OPEC PEAK

...Outside OPEC, production has already peaked in most countries and would peak in most others before 2030.
...


How do you interpret that? Are they saying most OPEC producers shall peak, following the fact that most non-OPEC have already peaked? Or are they saying most non-OPEC have peaked, and the rest of non-OPEC will peak before 2030?

Also, it's worth noting they conclude the price is affected by speculators:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Pronounced short-term swings in prices are likely to remain the norm," the IEA said.

"The sudden drop in oil prices in August and early September 2008 -- in the absence of any obvious major shift in demand or supply -- lends support to the argument that financial investors have been playing a significant role in amplifying the impact of tighter market fundamentals on prices."


I don't think Joe Sixpack is likely to read the Pdf so it's interesting to read the summaries in the press, who ultimately will present the IEA's findings to the masses. Thus, the scoop is, Reuters (can't get much more mainstream than that) acknowledges peak production, based on the IEA report.


Credit Crisis Adds To Risk of Oil Supply crunch
User avatar
virgincrude
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu 09 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Al-Mariyya, Al-Andalus
Top

Re: IEA doesn't see peak oil...

Postby Jotapay » Wed 12 Nov 2008, 13:31:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', 'W')asn't there just a leek last week from an IEA report to the Financial Times that said they projected decline rates from existing fields up from 6 to 9 percent?

Yes. That is why they wrote this line in the text:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')anadian oil sands, extra heavy oil, gas-to-liquids and coal-to-liquids will have to make up the difference.

We are screwed. There is no way we can get sufficient EROEI on those resources.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron