by Carlhole » Mon 27 Oct 2008, 11:13:41
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse2', '1'). World oil production essentially peaked/plateaued at about 85mbpd. Do you think that plateau was geologic limit?
2. World oil production essentially peaked/plateaued in 2005 at about 85mbpd while world GDP was growing (increasing demand for energy). Do you think that plateau in oil production was a cause of the high oil/energy prices or do you think it was just speculation?
I never have argued against the idea that oil will peak one day (or has peaked already even). I've only ever argued that there is plenty of room to adapt and innovate and compensate for the decline. And I have been anxious for the nation at large to get serious about alternative energy. The Doom crowd doesn't appear to believe that human beings are capable of making adaptations at all.
I had always thought that the main threat caused by the peaking of world oil production was geopolitical strife, resource wars and such - simply because the Pentagon is what it is, because The Carter Doctrine has been formalized over the years, and institutions like those don't change their spots overnight.
Also, the private, historical Anglo-American oil interests are powerful capitalist groups who are admirably represented in Washington by people like Dick Cheney. So, if fields in Mexico, the North Sea, and elsewhere have already peaked, its not surprising that a Dick like Cheney is at the helm guiding US actions in Iraq - the last, rich, cheap oil province left on the planet. This has always been my main interest; its a working hypothesis that will be proven true or untrue in the near future.
As for the other questions, I can only re-post something I wrote in the "Stick To Peak Oil" thread:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'O')utside of PO.com, I'm seeing more views like this one about this year's dramatic market movements:
Tax Cuts, Lower Oil Prices Will Boost Economy$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Forbes guy', 'T')he financial crisis, economic turmoil, and the stock market sell-off have investors in the doldrums. One bright spot, however, is the recent plunge in oil prices. While this is a welcome development, it is not entirely unexpected. In recent years, easy monetary policy brought us the tech stock bubble, the housing bubble, and the commodities bubble.
High oil prices were largely the result of a weak dollar. They had less to do with strong demand or too little supply. Perhaps it took longer than it should have, but high oil prices finally caused the demand destruction we have been expecting. In reality, this destruction has been going on for months, but it become noticeable only recently. For example, the Department of Transportation just documented a decline of 15 billion fewer miles driven in August 2008 than in August 2007. But it's already late October. No doubt, demand has continued to fall during the last two months as well. Furthermore, as I explained more than a month ago in Forbes magazine, "with global economies slowing, the dollar strengthening and U.S. demand declining, even the threat of hurricanes can't keep oil's price up."
OPEC has long been saying there is plenty of supply. Now it is worried there is too much. Cooler heads at OPEC never wanted to see prices go as high as they did because they feared high prices would cause a global recession—something that is clearly bad for their business. Now they are just as worried that prices will plunge to levels not seen in years. This is why OPEC just announced a 1.5 million barrel per day production cut.
But just as OPEC was unable to keep prices from spiking, it is likely to find that it can't prevent prices from falling. Some OPEC nations with weak economies were already exceeding their quotas, trying to sell as much oil as they could at ridiculously high prices. On paper, these nations are entirely in favor of a production cut. However, in practice, they will find it much harder to stick to their promises.
Some economists fear that lower oil prices will cause Americans to return to their profligate ways—putting conservation aside and buying up SUVs and pick-up trucks once again. This won't happen. Every automobile company has invested millions—if not billions—retooling their factories to produce more fuel-efficient vehicles. No one is in favor of going back to old ways.
Lower oil prices and more efficient cars will leave consumers with more cash to spend on other things. This could do as much good as a meaningful tax cut, helping to revive the economy. Combine lower oil prices with a real tax cut and the economy is likely to boom. But if OPEC manages to push oil prices back up to recent highs, the U.S. and the entire world will have an extremely difficult time shaking off this recession.
The rise of China and India had definitely pushed oil up into a higher price plateau from the ultra-cheap levels it had been at in 1998 - probably into the $50 - $60 range.
But absent financial mis-management, supply seems to have been adequate and was not the
reason for oil skyrocketing up to $147.
This whole thing will be revisited and debated for quite some time as we all watch further economic developments. But I'm seeing more evidence that massive money flows rushing to safety in the oil and commodity markets as the dollar tanked had been the
reason for the big market move in oil.
Right now, gold is falling - or at least there is no upward pressure on it. If the market at large had the same apocalyptic vision as doom crowd around here, gold would be at $2,500 by now.