by Outcast_Searcher » Sun 30 Jun 2013, 14:52:35
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', ' ')Cutting off Nasa would mean turning off the spigot to a large part America's innovation pool.
How about we just intelligently prioritize our funding, since we can't afford everything?
For example, telescope technology, and what the major planned telescopic missions can teach us is astounding. Yet we are also cutting significantly into even THAT.
I would say let's learn all we can, safely and cheaply, via observation and analysis -- until we manage to return to financial soundness. If we happen to discover something worth visiting for the enormous expense (at this stage, the moon is unlikely to be it) -- then that issue can be evaluated.
....
But that is the problem with all government generally, isn't it? The mental 9 year olds (voted in by the population) can't prioritize intelligently, if at all. Pick ANY class of government programs -- this seems to be true.
Yes, we learn from space exploration, and as a geek I am happy to fund that. As a realistic tax-paying member of a basically bankrupt country though -- again, I see a serious need to prioritize.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.