Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Department of Energy (DOE) Thread (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Ford Gets $10 Million from US DOE

Postby Plantagenet » Wed 08 Oct 2008, 11:31:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('species8742', 't')here is no way we can even come close to replaceing our oil needs with electiricity, and as electricity is used, prices increase. If one out of twelve families buy an electric car, we will DOUBLE our electric consumption and the grid cant supply our needs.
Electricity is the universal energy currency. That's where we're headed in the end whether you like it or not. If the grid can't handle it, put a solar array on your roof or build a windmill. Can't afford it? Tough luck. That's powerdown for you.

Nukes. Nukes supply 70% of the power in France, where electric light rail and high speed electric intercity trains create the most sophisticated transportation grid in the world. We could do that too.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Ford Gets $10 Million from US DOE

Postby nocar » Wed 08 Oct 2008, 19:42:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ukes supply 70% of the power in France, where electric light rail and high speed electric intercity trains create the most sophisticated transportation grid in the world. We could do that too.

Yes, but France does not run cars on electric power. There sure is better places to use electric power than in cars.
nocar
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Fri 05 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Ford Gets $10 Million from US DOE

Postby mos6507 » Wed 08 Oct 2008, 23:49:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nocar', '
')Yes, but France does not run cars on electric power.


Not yet, but they are very shortly going to build electric cars in large numbers.

http://www.betterplace.com/

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nocar', '
')There sure is better places to use electric power than in cars.


Yeah, let's not waste any zero-carbon energy. Let's just keep burning gasoline instead for transport. After all, we know oil will last forever, right? That's why we're here.
mos6507
 
Top

Why is DOE testing E15/E20?

Postby frankthetank » Thu 09 Oct 2008, 10:44:21

Is 10% ethanol going to be bumped up? I use to be able to buy gasoline without ethanol, and now you can't' find it anywhere. Is E20 the next step? Sometimes i wonder even right now, if the gas i'm putting in is even E10 (wouldn't doubt if they "water" it down with ethanol to make up for gasoline shortages).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')DOE reports no difference between ethanol and gasoline

Washington, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has released preliminary results from a test program initiated in August 2007 to assess the potential effects of higher intermediate ethanol blends on conventional vehicles and other engines that rely on gasoline. The program focuses specifically on E15 and E20 (gasoline blended with 15 and 20 per cent ethanol, respectively) on emissions, catalyst and engine durability, driveability and operability.

The tests were performed on 13 popular late-model vehicles and 28 small non-road engines, including lawn equipment and generators.

On vehicles tested with E15 and E20 against regular gasoline, the researchers found that tailpipe emissions were similar, and under normal operations, catalyst temperatures in the cars were largely unchanged. When tested under full-throttle conditions, about half the cars exhibited slightly increased catalyst temperatures with the enthanol blends. Overall, based on informal observations during testing, driveability was unchanged.

When the small non-road engines were tested with E15 and E20 compared with traditional gasoline, the researchers found that the regulated emissions remained largely unchanged, but engine and exhaust temperatures increased as ethanol content increased. Engine performance was inconsistent, even with traditional gasoline, and commercial engines exhibited no particular sensitivity to ethanol from a durability perspective. The effect of E15 and E20 on the durability of smaller, less expensive residential engines such as weed trimmers was not clear, given that a number of these engines failed regardless of fuel type.


I don't know if i like the sound of this. I'm sure fuel mileage will take another hit, so we'll just end up burning more.
link
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI
Top

Re: Ford Gets $10 Million from US DOE

Postby nocar » Thu 09 Oct 2008, 11:20:39

It is entirely possible to have a reasonable amount of personal mobility by a combination of bicycles and electric trains, although of course in many parts of the world this requires reforms of land use patterns, as well as some personal adjustment (such as moving closer to work, or changing jobs). Still, this is a much more sustainable strategy than replacing ICE cars with electric cars. Remember, making cars takes energy too.

Transporting food across continents can also be reduced.
New buildings can be put up using local materials.

There are many ways of reducing oil use for transport simply by reducing transport.

The link to 'betterplace' seems just to be the usual marketing smokescreens from car shows.

nocar
nocar
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Fri 05 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Ford Gets $10 Million from US DOE

Postby mos6507 » Thu 09 Oct 2008, 11:59:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nocar', '
')There are many ways of reducing oil use for transport simply by reducing transport.


So when you lay out this "Plan B" as so many do, it ignores the matter of actually selling the concept to the masses. If you look at things purely from an efficiency perspective, and you are given dictatorial powers, you can really do a lot of good to reduce oil consumption. You FORCE adaptation whether people like it or not.

But if you look at things having to follow a market-based solution where people voluntarily adapt, then extreme adaptation goes right out the window. People see cars as the ultimate tool of personal freedom, almost an extension of their bodies. Go anywhere you like whenever you want at a high speed and in climate controlled comfort. All the alternatives have some degree of loss of convenience or comfort. Go slower, get soaked in rain, have to follow the track from station to station, have to be at point A or B at a certain time. I am not saying alternatives are bad. I'm just saying the vast majority will hold onto their cars until the last possible moment when the economics can no longer be justified. They will then move down the chain of alternatives gradually. EV/plugins will be more attractive to a lot of people than bikes or trains.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Ford Gets $10 Million from US DOE

Postby nocar » Thu 09 Oct 2008, 20:15:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m just saying the vast majority will hold onto their cars until the last possible moment when the economics can no longer be justified. They will then move down the chain of alternatives gradually. EV/plugins will be more attractive to a lot of people than bikes or trains.



Well, yes, I agree. And there sure is a cost-benefit calculation going on for many people in regard to car driving and car ownership. Right now people are adapting to the car driving economics by not buying cars, and US oil consumption is down too. The issue here is that governments are interfering by propping up the car industry. Bad move.

nocar
nocar
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Fri 05 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Previous

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron