But, but, but...that would be sssssocialism! egads!
Ideological blinkers will continue to keep any such "solution" from being considered, even with many high-powered economists weighing in on it.
I thought the program was awesome, too. About the only place in anything like the MSM where anything like the deeper truths behind this mess has come out. Everywhere else the picture is "people foreclosing on their houses are bringing down the whole economy"; a partial truth, at best.
Of course it would have been nice for someone to mention the fact that the Paulson plan shreds the last bit of constitution we have left. They mostly interviewed economists, and many of them were involved in these shenanigans to begin with, since they are some of the few who understand it.
And of course, it would have been nice if someone on the program had made a brief mention of PO and the role it will inevitably play/is playing in the ongoing unwinding of all this financial insanity.
But that would be wishing too much.
The other technical term I would like to have heard somewhere in the discussion of the Paulson fiasco is
pig in a poke. That term (OK, it's more folksy than technical) is the most appropriate one to capture what taxpayers have just bought.